Уже и не откажешь. Сроднились)))) https://t.me/Burovaia/15732 https://t.me/Burovaia/15733
👍18❤4🤡3❤🔥2🥱1😐1
Signed Леонид Крутаков

Channel
@nekrutakov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,435subscribers
+60 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001490097755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nekrutakov |
| Created | 2 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nekrutakov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 5,435 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:49 | 5,432 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 5,428 | +18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 5,410 | +58 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 5,352 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 5,353 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 5,356 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 5,359 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 5,371 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 5,373 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 5,375 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 5,375 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,345 reactions across 21 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 601 | 44.7% | |
| 💯 | 192 | 14.3% | |
| ❤ | 187 | 13.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 100 | 7.43% | |
| 🔥 | 96 | 7.14% | |
| 🤔 | 47 | 3.49% | |
| 🤡 | 30 | 2.23% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 1.78% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 1.12% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 1.04% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 0.743% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 0.446% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 0.297% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 0.297% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 0.223% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.149% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.149% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.149% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.074% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.074% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 0.297% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,345 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nekrutakov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Уже и не откажешь. Сроднились)))) https://t.me/Burovaia/15732 https://t.me/Burovaia/15733
👍18❤4🤡3❤🔥2🥱1😐1
Signed Леонид Крутаков
Неожиданно. После книги не знаю, чем себя занять. Опустошен как-то. Стал читать новостные ленты (это не значит, что я перестал читать книги😊). Так вот, если "зелёные человечки" реально существуют, то как же это меняет всю картину мира. Не могу даже представить себе список возникающих вопросов. Самый простой: Мы реально цивилизация или лабораторный опыт? Сказал супруге. Она: - Это правда? - Не знаю, файлы Пентагона.…
👍49😁24❤🔥13❤9🤡5💯4👏3🕊2
Signed Леонид Крутаков
Не бином Ньютона, но зато содержательно. https://m-ug.tsargrad.tv/news/ssha-vveli-protiv-rossii-novye-sankcii-ne-prosto-ocherednye-vsjo-interesnee-dlja-nas-chjornyj-jashhik_1810977?ysclid=mseu9d6c2b443379476
👍19❤🔥5🤡1
Signed Леонид Крутаков
Лишнего, по моему, спросонья наговорил))) Да и завершенная книга во мне орет во весь голос. А как сказал профессор, твой Армагеддон в концовке требует либо отдельной главы, либо отдельной книги, найди хотя бы какие-нибудь ссылки))) https://radiokp.ru/people/leonid-krutakov
👍24❤🔥8🔥8❤2🕊1
Signed Леонид Крутаков
Я ее добил. Сейчас прогоню с самого начала весь текст,напишу эпилог и в набор. И по традиции)))) «Новая модель транснационального накопления капитала (финансовая глобализация) разрушила, по мнению Джованни Арриги, представления об антагонизме национальных государств, которые лежат в основе классической теории империализма [170]. Однако, как показали последующие (уже после 2000 года) события, новая модель разрушила т…
🔥41❤26👏8❤🔥5👎2✍1🍾1🤡1
Signed Леонид Крутаков
Дважды за последнюю неделю столкнулся при разговоре с разными умными людьми с вопросом, почему не Медведев, а Собянин с Лавровым. Умные люди принадлежали к разным группировкам. От одних вопрос звучал в форме «унижения Медведева», от других – в форме «уважения к Собянину». Вспомнилась история возникновения «Единой России». Когда закачалась власть Ельцина (дело Беджета Пакколи и коррупции в семье: Дьяченко, Юмашев, Бо…
💯79❤24🤔22🔥11👍8😢7❤🔥2
Signed Леонид Крутаков
С Михаилом всегда интересно, потому что не поверхностно. Вглубь и с пониманием, хотя и провокационно... https://dzen.ru/video/watch/6a5f789c7829f80e6c35f98c?ysclid=mruuwmlr7p762837744 Или тут https://www.ya.ru/video/touch/preview/11923379955193731767
👍21❤🔥4🤡3
Signed Леонид Крутаков
Заканчиваю вторую книгу. Собираю в концовке "кубик Рубика", связываю все ниточки, которые распустил. Она уже рвется из меня. Вся сегодняшняя ситуация как на ладони. И эфир потому содержательный с Иваном вышел (с 9:03 в левом верхнем углу или после 1:03 эфирного времени). Здесь сразу сначала.
👍31❤10❤🔥3🤡1
Signed Леонид Крутаков
Снова Буровая меня эксплуатирует)))) https://t.me/Burovaia/15642
👍24🔥7❤2❤🔥2🤡2🥱1🥴1
Signed Леонид Крутаков
Четыре сценария от Мельниченко Сначала я мельком глянул и забыл. А потом накрыло. С чего вдруг олигарх пишет статью в The Economist? Это же очевидный вызов власти. Претензия на альтернативный курс развития России. Манифест. Вряд ли человек с таким уровнем личных рисков самостоятельно решился на выступление в западной прессе. И я вернулся. Я перечитал сценарии Мельниченко. В двух первых сценариях Россия превращается …
👍124💯49🤔17❤13🔥4🤡4🤮4👎2
Signed Леонид Крутаков
Вот новость, которая совсем не новость. Или новость для отроков сингулярности. А что в реальности? А в реальности процесс идет своим чередом. То, что ИИ является попыткой наполнить раздутый глобальный долг (номинирован в долларах) новым содержанием, не новость. Стартапы уже шаг в этом направлении - будущая потенциальная стоимость оформляется как доход сегодня без гарантий, что потенциал будет реализован. Ярчайший пр…
👍24🔥10💯7❤4❤🔥3👎1
Signed Леонид Крутаков
Немного не готов был к теме проблем с бензином внутри страны. Обычно Саша более глубокую проблематику задевает, к ней и готовился. Тем не менее... https://cloud.smotrim.ru/s/imfDfjGnSdrLsrd
👍9❤🔥8⚡1🤡1
Signed Леонид Крутаков
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @nekrutakov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НЕКРУТАКОВ” (@nekrutakov), 5,435 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nekrutakov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.