Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Neltez Community

Channel

Neltez Community

@neltezcommunity

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

16,051subscribers

+800 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001998495619
TypeChannel
Username@neltezcommunity
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/neltezcommunity

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,25116,05115,65110 August 2026 — 15,251 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,251 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,265 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,269 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,288 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,308 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,332 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,370 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,385 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,418 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,452 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,477 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,516 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,540 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,551 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,562 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,591 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,611 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,638 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,656 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,688 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,714 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,766 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,798 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,847 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,932 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,979 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,022 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,051 subscribers10 August 202616 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 38 days, net +800. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,131–16,171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 16:0116,051+29
14 Sept 2026, 19:5816,022+43
13 Sept 2026, 09:3715,979+47
11 Sept 2026, 12:1515,932+85
8 Sept 2026, 17:3715,847+49
5 Sept 2026, 07:5715,798+32
3 Sept 2026, 13:0215,766+52
2 Sept 2026, 05:4415,714+26
1 Sept 2026, 05:3615,688+32
31 Aug 2026, 07:1415,656+18
30 Aug 2026, 06:2415,638+27
29 Aug 2026, 05:0715,611+20
28 Aug 2026, 06:4315,591+29
27 Aug 2026, 03:2815,562+11
26 Aug 2026, 02:4315,551+11
25 Aug 2026, 01:2815,540+24
23 Aug 2026, 13:0615,516+39
21 Aug 2026, 20:0815,477+25
20 Aug 2026, 15:0315,452+34
19 Aug 2026, 12:5515,418first reading

Engagement

273 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.52%
avg views ÷ 16,051 subscribers
Avg views / post
726
216 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
216
of 273 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 105 of 216 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held273 (31 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total156,847
Reactions total244
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4h 31m
Average length
2m 40s

Measured directly from 102 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

390 reactions across 130 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27771.0%
🔥317.95%
😭246.15%
👎215.38%
👍123.08%
🤣82.05%
🥰51.28%
💔41.03%
❤‍🔥20.513%
😍20.513%
👏10.256%
😢10.256%
🤔10.256%
🤩10.256%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 149 of the 273 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 390 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 273 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 273 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neltezcommunity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 273 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 01:53 UTC919 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @KonnosClipsVideo

Bellingham Upscaled Clip🔥 - 3840x2160p - 50fps - 50mbps - 89mb By - @KonnosClips & @MbappePremium🥰

2

Signed konnos

1 Sept 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,300 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Lamine Yamal X Anthony Gordon 🇪🇸 vs Rayo Vallecano 🇪🇸 1080P 👍 MINI COMP By : @neltezcommunity 👍 #neltez4Kclips

4

Signed Neltez

31 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 3 September 2026

Liverpool vs Nottingham Forest 4k 50fps sdr Now sports 1 4k https://transfer.it/t/A6oXgdwz1RCT By: @hyperftblae x @LiveGoals4K

31 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC≈1,500 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Man utd vs Ipswich Town 4k 50fps hdr Astro supersport uhd https://transfer.it/t/KBCY1Fg30TDD By: @hyperftblae x @LiveGoals4K

31 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC≈1,430 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @agonylivegoalsPhoto

Lamine Yamal 5-2 vs Rayo Vallecano https://mega.nz/file/rqI0AKQS#2GqkopDLjo2gCWyv57e7r5L12SgkPie9fXjy1Uq_FUc Leaked Here: @agonylivegoals X @legitsxstrongchannel

Signed Marwan

31 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @LegitsxStrongChannelPhoto

Raphinha Goal 4-2 4K HDR https://mega.nz/file/63gg2BRR#7C-iR0CrM338S33b57K5J-H5ki5uYY2OkLzYICHJ5mM By:@LegitsxStrongChannel & @agonylivegoals

Signed Marwan

31 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @LegitsxStrongChannelPhoto

Sergio Camello Goal 3-2 4K HDR https://mega.nz/file/bjA23ZLJ#_FV3FrOYKgpwLtLP5o62w--MGKTixuDT24gccb0e4AY By:@LegitsxStrongChannel & @agonylivegoals

Signed Marwan

31 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @agonylivegoalsPhoto

Lamine Yamal Goal 2-1 4K HDR https://mega.nz/file/er4WjBBa#roRtmgeXNvbEZhHCUSrDtIM7zQZ9mdiVF8mcpOihkcM Leaked Here: @agonylivegoals X @legitsxstrongchannel

Signed Marwan

31 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @agonylivegoalsPhoto

Anthony Gordon 3-1 vs Rayo Vallecano https://mega.nz/file/eywz0AZL#iKsSqUMJVvNT3G2zM8sNIgBO2dlKzcZB8NlqcvD6Ilk Leaked Here: @agonylivegoals X @legitsxstrongchannel

Signed Marwan

31 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC977 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @LegitsxStrongChannelPhoto

Raphinha Goal 1-1 4K HDR https://mega.nz/file/m25jlZxK#72f3H5BDM_5V-8GVLypSWkovYoJgQF3L6AZbvTSzR4U By:@LegitsxStrongChannel & @agonylivegoals

1

Signed Marwan

31 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @LegitsxStrongChannelPhoto

Sergio Camello Goal 1-0 4K HDR https://mega.nz/file/yvJg2KKY#f_aGumwQ7kRM6LVnaGHHfGQXAwS90H6r6Neqq5k2T0g By:@LegitsxStrongChannel & @agonylivegoals

Signed Marwan

31 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC≈1,180 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @elitelivegoalPhoto

[UHD HDR] Saka 1-0 vs Villa https://mega.nz/file/WixzFKjQ#4QVpa7_nLqSC8ZJx6602t1A5NLdpVurUQ8eeEMSZ67E @Elitelivegoal/ #Fdemm

1

Signed Neltez

Showing the 12 most recent of 273 posts we hold for @neltezcommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Neltez Community” (@neltezcommunity), 16,051 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neltezcommunity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.