Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Неогенда

Channel

Неогенда

@neogenda

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,885subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001197854973
TypeChannel
Username@neogenda
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/neogenda

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8841,8991,891.56 August 2026 — 1,895 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,895 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,899 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,897 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,898 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,895 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,892 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,894 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,895 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,890 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,884 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,887 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,885 subscribers1,8856 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 44 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,882–1,901 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:571,885-2
14 Sept 2026, 21:371,887+3
11 Sept 2026, 15:011,884-6
7 Sept 2026, 09:161,890-5
3 Sept 2026, 00:541,895+1
28 Aug 2026, 07:031,894+2
25 Aug 2026, 06:361,892-3
22 Aug 2026, 14:121,895-3
19 Aug 2026, 12:541,898+1
16 Aug 2026, 08:181,897-2
9 Aug 2026, 18:421,899+4
6 Aug 2026, 20:201,895no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:311,895first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1651.6%
1032.3%
😁26.45%
13.23%
😱13.23%
🤔13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC550 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А вот и запись вебинара по Карте Реализации Историй (КРИ) с Андреем Шапиро (автором подхода). Дополнительная информация по Карте Реализации Историй Инструмент, в котором мы рисовали карту А вот ссылки на видео: RUTube VKVideo

👍3

31 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC222 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

За последние годы мы десятки компаний, которые говорили: «Мы внедрили OKR» или «Мы добились высокого уровня OKR» . Но если посмотреть глубже, оказывается, что внедрили они совсем не OKR, а внешние признаки и атрибуты OKR, такие как форму формулирования, форму отчетности и набор встреч. Давайте потихоньку раскрывать типовые ошибки, которые мы наблюдаем. Вот вам первые две: ♦ На высоком уровне создаются, для объедин

👍2

30 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC321 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья! Надеюсь вы не забыли, что сегодня в 18:00 (буквально через полчаса) у нас в эфире будет Андрей Шапиро и в связи с выходом его новой книги мы будем говорить о Карте реализации историй! Подключайтесь!

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC327 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Знакомая ситуация? ♦Компания объявила «AI-трансформацию», и никто не понимает, что это значит для вашей роли? ♦Вы «умеете промптить», но дальше окна чата дело не пошло? ♦Хотели собрать агента — упёрлись в корпоративный ноутбук, безопасников и отсутствие доступов? ♦Руководство спрашивает про эффект от ИИ, а показать нечего, кроме сэкономленных минут на письмах? ♦Коллеги шепчутся, кого «оптимизируют» первым? И тут ст

1

29 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC317 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Судя по всему 2026 год пройдет у нас под лозунгом поднятия операционной эффективности. Что это значит для тех, кто работает в разработке или развитии продуктов и услуг умственного труда? Вас будут просить сократить время реализации функциональности или повысить пропускную способонсть. А как справлялись с такими вещами последнее время? Правильно, перенарезали велью-стримы и команды, пытались внедрить практики в надеж

👍1🤔1

28 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC285 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Из чего состоит процесс выработки стратегии? Из следующих этапов: 1. Анализ и прогнозирование 2. Целеполагание 3. Стратегирование дальше идет уже разработка дорожной карты и реализация... В результате анализа и прогнозирования вы выявляете тренды развития рынка, угрозы, ваше понимание позиций и возможностей вашей компании на рынке. Существует множество различных инструментов для того, чтобы провести анализ и выработ

1

27 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,040 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, а у Ивана Алексеева вышло новое интервью с Алексеем Пименовым. Вопросики к Канбан-тренеру и практику от серьезного специалиста по управлению проектами. Смотрим: ♦RuTube ♦VKVideo ♦YouTube И конечно же подписывайтесь на все каналы Ивана, там много интересного и полезного TG|YouTube|VKVideoIRuTube

👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @neogenda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🔥 Дмитрий Ирешев: AI • Продукты • Проекты
@dmitrii_ireshev_Agile_PMP · 27,750
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Нестыдная фасилитация
@no_shame_facilitation · 22,868
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
Максим Дорофеев: Прокрастинация и джедайские техники
@mnogosdelal · 26,254
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Неогенда” (@neogenda), 1,885 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neogenda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.