Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for хроники пикирующего капитализма

Channel

хроники пикирующего капитализма

@nepmansky

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,588subscribers

-257 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001568679790
TypeChannel
Username@nepmansky
DescriptionИстория современности и ближайшего будущего. Для связи - @hobsbaum
Created27 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nepmansky

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,58812,85012,7196 August 2026 — 12,845 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,845 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,846 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,841 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,840 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,850 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,846 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,843 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,842 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,839 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,838 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,830 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,828 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,827 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,826 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,816 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,800 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,791 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,787 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,782 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,776 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,773 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,770 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,758 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,755 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,741 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,735 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,729 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,723 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,713 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,703 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,702 subscribers26 September 2026 — 12,684 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,672 subscribers9 October 2026 — 12,671 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,652 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,646 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,643 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,644 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,640 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,639 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,631 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,622 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,614 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,609 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,610 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,609 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,610 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,608 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,602 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,597 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,600 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,601 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,597 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,595 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,593 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,588 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 93 days, net -257. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,549–12,889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 09:5612,588-5
6 Nov 2026, 06:5012,593-2
5 Nov 2026, 06:2012,595-2
4 Nov 2026, 03:5612,597-4
3 Nov 2026, 01:1712,601+1
1 Nov 2026, 23:5612,600+3
30 Oct 2026, 21:3112,597-5
29 Oct 2026, 23:3712,602-6
27 Oct 2026, 23:3512,608-2
26 Oct 2026, 20:3612,610+1
25 Oct 2026, 19:5712,609-1
23 Oct 2026, 20:3812,610+1
22 Oct 2026, 22:5612,609-5
21 Oct 2026, 20:3512,614-8
20 Oct 2026, 13:5012,622-9
19 Oct 2026, 12:0912,631-8
18 Oct 2026, 15:2812,639-1
17 Oct 2026, 14:4012,640-4
16 Oct 2026, 11:2612,644+1
15 Oct 2026, 12:0612,643first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.9%
avg views ÷ 12,588 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,020
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held50 (20 June 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total75,370
Reactions total2,024
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 19:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈648
Videos
≈15
Links
≈1,790

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

7,093 reactions across 49 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,40733.9%
🔥1,37519.4%
💊1,36519.2%
🤔1,01514.3%
🦄2753.88%
😁2623.69%
🥱1221.72%
🙈690.973%
😡470.663%
🫡390.55%
🍾350.493%
👻310.437%
😍240.338%
😱100.141%
🤓70.099%
😢60.085%
😘40.056%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,093 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,720 views86 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Гол в свои ворота Уэйн Гретцки поддержал решение Канады не пускать сборную России по хоккею на молодежный чемпионат мира, несмотря на допуск от международной федерации Позиция большинства западных стран в отношении российского спорта – глупая ошибка. Учимся, как не надо действовать. 1. Ты на пустом месте создаешь обоснованную обиду, за которую можно предъявить. 2. Ты не следуешь собственным задекларированным прин…

🔥46👍27😁7🤔3🙈2🫡1

4 Nov 2026, 09:36 UTC≈2,870 views122 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Загогулина Если бы Трампа не было, его бы следовало придумать. Иногда людям надо показывать плохой пример, чтобы направить куда надо. В России, например, таким жупелом стал Ельцин. Трамп залез в Иран и не смог вылезти – это его Первая Чеченская война. Он постоянно показывает свою дурь всему миру, позорит сторонников. Его словесный понос в соцсетях – это его алкоголизм. Теперь он получил свой 1993 год и жесткую за…

👍74🔥17💊15👻6😁4🍾2🫡2🤔1

3 Nov 2026, 06:29 UTC≈3,600 views178 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Как перестать беспокоиться и начать жить Политики говорят поэтам, что поэзия далека от жизни. Что ж, может и так, но политика от жизни еще дальше Вы слишком серьёзно ко всему относитесь. Классики промыли вам мозги: мол жизнь это поле битвы, борьба, победитель получает всё. Маркс, Дарвин, Бентам, Гегель — они все об одном. Гребаные позитивисты 19 века, которые решили будто что-то поняли и только научили нас ненавид…

💊80🔥42🤔24🦄12👍8🥱8😁2🍾1

30 Oct 2026, 08:03 UTC≈5,110 views110 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Вскрытие показало Крупнейшую криптобиржу мира Binance взломали хакеры (предположительно, северокорейские) и вывели оттуда активы на миллиарды долларов. Как же так? Ведь сама суть блокчейна подразумевает прозрачность транзакции, то есть и кошелек вора виден, и сами «цифровые деньги» меченые. Но в реальности, как показывали предыдущие случаи, отмыть похищенную крипту можно, если дать ей отлежаться пару лет, раздробит…

🔥71🤔24💊11👍2🥱2

29 Oct 2026, 06:20 UTC≈5,140 views151 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Репликанты Вы обращали внимание на то, что современный Китай и генеративный ИИ очень похожи? Китай делает всё более качественные копии товаров. ИИ делает всё более качественные копии контента и услуг. Оба почти не создают нового — но великолепно перерабатывают то, что уже было. А еще: оба генерируют сейчас гигантский долг под обещание будущей гегемонии. Это высасывание капитала из старого мира. Становятся нерентаб…

👍74💊27😁22🤔17🦄7🫡4

28 Oct 2026, 12:41 UTC≈3,700 views196 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Думскролл Мы таких новостей не замечаем, а если и замечаем, то не верим. Число зарегистрированных тяжких и особо тяжких преступлений в России в 2026 году снизилось на 21%, в том числе со стороны мигрантов на 40% - МВД В медучреждениях, внедривших ИИ, показатели летальности могут быть ниже на 40% - Минздрав Мы не верим, потому что на экране смартфона, в наших избранных пабликах мир выглядит страшным и токсичным. И…

💊88🤔40👍33🔥15🙈11👻3😍3😡3

23 Oct 2026, 05:14 UTC≈4,880 views167 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Машина желаний Современные экономисты (например, Альберто Алесина) на больших выборках показали, что ощущение благополучия у человека создается не закрытием базовых потребностей и общим уровнем жизни, а сравнением с окружением. Мы считаем себя довольными, только если нам есть, чем похвастаться перед соседом. И наоборот – ощущаем себя неудачниками, когда все уже начали кататься на сапах, а ты еще нет. Вот такие мы …

🔥93👍41💊14🤔12🥱5🦄1🫡1

21 Oct 2026, 04:01 UTC≈4,840 views80 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Золотая лихорадка IPO компании Anthropic станет крупнейшим в истории. Накануне листинга корпорация объявила о том, что потратит дополнительные $750 млрд на компьютерные вычисления в ближайшие годы. То, что в искусственном интеллекте существует гигантский финансовый пузырь, очевидно. То, что он скорее рано, чем поздно лопнет, тоже. И что? Это совершенно нормально. Более того, это парадоксально доказывает, что техно…

🔥33👍26🤔16💊5

20 Oct 2026, 11:04 UTC≈6,970 views133 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Сила есть, ума не надо Вопреки массовому убеждению один из главных апостолов капитализма Дарвин никогда не писал «Выживает сильнейший», это т.н. эффект Манделы или выдача желаемого за действительное. В реальности формула звучит Survival of the fittest, то есть «Выживает наиболее приспособленный». Разница такая же как между мародером из парижского бутика Guerlain и стримером на твиче. Или бритым братком из ОПГ «Ново…

👍75🤔22🔥16💊12🤓2🦄2😁2😡2

18 Oct 2026, 19:05 UTC≈5,330 views109 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Кто ты Немногие понимают значение термина «эмбеддинг», между тем это ключевой организационный принцип сетевого общества, подобно тому как «эволюция» - организационный принцип иерархического (капиталистического) общества. Я буду объяснять очень просто. Эмбеддинг – это разложение объекта, понятия или процесса на мириады числовых параметров. Таков основной принцип работы нейросетей. Генерируя текст, они учитывают не т…

🤔45👍22💊22🙈7🔥4🥱4🦄3😁2

15 Oct 2026, 10:44 UTC≈5,650 views112 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Кухаркины дети Во Франции зумеры протестуют против недофинансирования образования, в Албании – против слишком высоких цен на учебу, а индийские кукарачи – против коррупции при проведении госэкзаменов. Понятно, что все это повод и проблема шире – в том, что элита не хочет кардинальных перемен, не хочет впускать новый мир на порог, застряла в позапрошлогодних обидах. Но повод показательный. Искусственный интеллект и…

🔥66🤔18🥱13🙈5🍾4💊3😁3

14 Oct 2026, 07:42 UTC≈5,210 views93 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Divisio imperii Масштабные работы по разведыванию нефти, газа и минералов вот-вот начнутся в нашей новой и прекрасной Гренландии – Трамп Донни в кои-то веки провернул удачную сделку, фактически продавив европейцев на де-факто оккупацию ледяного острова. Думаю, изначально цель так и формулировалась - военные базы и добыча. А социальными расходами и администрированием пусть датчане занимаются. Классическая схема по …

👍52🤔15💊11🔥7🦄6👻2

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @nepmansky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @nepmansky as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
34 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алексей Кричевский | Экономизм
@economismrussia · 19,607
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 October 2026
РТФ. Российский Трудовой Фронт
@RotFront_su · 24,967
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
Простые числа
@primenumbers2021 · 68,551
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Седьмая печать
@sevseal · 23,761
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
Думай сам/Думай сейчас.
@dumai_sam_i_sei4as · 29,853
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
ТехноМакс: Максим Багаев
@Tehnomaks · 40,541
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 September 2026
Angry Bonds
@angrybonds · 24,256
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Русский экономизм
@russianeconomism · 76,866
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
Инфляционный шок!
@inflation_shock · 39,769
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Брошка Наебуллиной
@naebrosh · 41,764
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
АГИТПРОП
@Agitblog · 109,131
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Диалектик
@dialectic_club · 26,322
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“хроники пикирующего капитализма” (@nepmansky), 12,588 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nepmansky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.