Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нерис печатает…

Channel

Нерис печатает…

@neris_is_typing

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

194subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001407272181
TypeChannel
Username@neris_is_typing
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/neris_is_typing

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1931951947 August 2026 — 195 subscribers8 August 2026 — 195 subscribers16 August 2026 — 194 subscribers25 August 2026 — 193 subscribers11 September 2026 — 194 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 34 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 193–195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 00:57194+1
25 Aug 2026, 02:34193-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:58194-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:46195no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:56195first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52670310434870518842832.9%
custom 54088467447273343381922.4%
custom 52694810302716433531214.1%
custom 535982750129403741255.88%
🕊55.88%
custom 526943688230281164544.71%
custom 533453898725826542844.71%
💅33.53%
custom 521760839525048558322.35%
custom 543383983373262821822.35%
🤯11.18%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC65 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Каждый раз супернеловко себя чувствую, когда хвалюсь, но, кажется, это полезно? Или нет?

custom 52670310434870518849🕊5

7 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC67 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А вообще-то я ещё и красотка невероятная

custom 540884674472733433810custom 52670310434870518844custom 54338398337326282182

7 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC67 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот — я и салат

custom 53598275012940374125custom 52694368823028116454custom 52176083952504855832custom 52670310434870518841

7 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC65 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это мы сегодня вышли из дома, чтобы приготовить себе ужин ❤️😋

custom 526703104348705188410custom 53345389872582654281custom 54088467447273343381

7 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC94 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Да они достали меня! Они меня путают с кем-то старым, очевидно

custom 53345389872582654283custom 52670310434870518842

5 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC110 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Полагаю, большая часть подписчиков этого канала слыхом не слыхивала про башорг, так что поясню нетленочку Извините, Вы не можете использовать указанный пароль. Такой пароль уже использует пользователь Misha. Пожалуйста, придумайте другой пароль.

💅3🤯1

5 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC111 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54088467447273343388custom 52670310434870518842

3 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC139 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как можно обижать этих колбасок! Эти глазки 💔💔💔

custom 52694810302716433537

3 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC135 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zverdoskaPhoto

Помогаю информационно. Лабинск. Краснодарского края!!! Нам пишут: "Забрала у соседей (многодетная семья с социальными нюансами) мопсика. Мне собака не нужна, я не держу животных дома, но может есть неравнодушные люди, которым собачка нужна . Он здоров ,но истощен. Морили голодом. Накормила, оставила у себя. Если готовы взять, звоните, приезжайте. Собака не старая. +79094537453 Лена" в Макс @doskalabinsk 🦕Зоодоска б…

custom 52694810302716433535

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @neris_is_typing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нерис печатает…” (@neris_is_typing), 194 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neris_is_typing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.