Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for nescafe bases // 네스

Channel

nescafe bases // 네스

@nescafebases

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

429subscribers

+87 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003566056865
TypeChannel
Username@nescafebases
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 9 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nescafebases

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

342429385.512 August 2026 — 342 subscribers12 August 2026 — 344 subscribers19 August 2026 — 372 subscribers25 August 2026 — 390 subscribers31 August 2026 — 410 subscribers9 September 2026 — 421 subscribers16 September 2026 — 429 subscribers12 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net +87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 329–442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 15:01429+8
9 Sept 2026, 00:41421+11
31 Aug 2026, 11:25410+20
25 Aug 2026, 08:01390+18
19 Aug 2026, 04:23372+28
12 Aug 2026, 15:34344+2
12 Aug 2026, 02:01342first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓4337.4%
💘3530.4%
❤‍🔥3026.1%
💋65.22%
🆒10.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 19:39 UTC323 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁🌟 спойлер новой базы!!🌟☁️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ первый пост с реакциями😇 🌟 ода сесбиан лекс👀 #네스 #спойлер

💘35❤‍🔥26🍓22💋6🆒1

25 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC329 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁🌟 кисуня🌟☁️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ☁️файл в комментариях! 🌟ВАС 300,СПАСИБО😑 База пиксельная🥰 #네스 #nescafebases #фрибаза_nscff #полтела_nscff

🍓5❤‍🔥4

24 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC344 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁🌟 sexy lady 🌟☁️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ☁️файл в комментариях! (Снова пиксельная) добейте 300 пдп пожалуйста 😑 #네스 #nescafebases #фрибаза_nscff #полнорост_nscff #изпредложки_nscff

🍓1

24 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC540 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁🌟 Хитрая моська🌟☁️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ☁️файл в комментариях! во первых,она пиксельная🥰 а во вторых, осталось 2 человека до 300 пдп🥺 #네스 #nescafebases #фрибаза_nscff #полтела_nscff

🍓2

19 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC494 viewsread 12 August 2026

💊скидывайте работки с вашими поняшками сюда, (тык) а заодно и похвастайтесь свой любимой песней!🌸🐈

19 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC664 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁🌟 got me excited!!🌟☁️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ☁️файл в комментариях! простите за пропажу,вернулась с новой базой! песенку можно и нужно вставить свою =) правила на базы в описании канала #네스 #nescafebases #фрибаза_nscff #хэд_nscff #сфоном_nscff

7 Jun 2026, 08:55 UTC792 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁🌟 шарики шарикии 🌟☁️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ☁️файл в комментариях! пробная пиксельная, поэтому немного корявая 👀 #네스 #nescafebases #полнорост_nscff #фрибаза_nscff

1 May 2026, 19:22 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁🌟 с днем рождения меня🤩🌟☁️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🍵подобие фейк-коллаба🪷 ☁️файл в комментариях! (буду рада подрисовкам и поздравлениям в комментариях)✨ #네스 #nescafebases #2пони_nscff #фрибаза_nscff #хед_nscff #сфоном_nscff

15 Apr 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,160 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁🌟 nobody knows 🌟☁️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ☁️файл в комментариях! #네스 #nescafebases #фрибаза_nscff #хэд_nscff #сфоном_nscff

🍓1

15 Apr 2026, 15:55 UTC≈1,000 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁🌟 погладушки 🌟☁️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ☁️файл в комментариях! #네스 #nescafebases #фрибаза_nscff #хэд_nscff

🍓1

1 Apr 2026, 17:09 UTC≈1,120 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁🌟 JUST YUMMY🌟☁️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ☁️файл в комментариях! #네스 #nescafebases #фрибаза_nscff #хэд_nscff

🍓1

22 Mar 2026, 08:37 UTC≈1,400 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁🌟 BFF🌟☁️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ☁️файл в комментариях! 🌟мои первые отписки,так волнительно👀 #네스 #nescafebases #2пони_nscff #фрибаза_nscff #сфоном_nscff

🍓2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nescafebases. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“nescafe bases // 네스” (@nescafebases), 429 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nescafebases.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.