Video message, posted without a caption
😁6☃1👀1

Channel
@nesterlox
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
109subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001060540030 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nesterlox |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nesterlox |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 109 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 108 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 110 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 109 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 109 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 2 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 25.4% | |
| 🍓 | 16 | 13.6% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 11.9% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 9.32% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 8.47% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 7.63% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 🦄 | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 💅 | 5 | 4.24% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 November 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
😁6☃1👀1
блять. я купил билет на концерт вани дмитриенко в лужниках норм или стрём??????
🥰2
ещё фан факт в том, что дуров смотрел мои истории как только их ввели в тг это было ещё до того, как он спалил свой прошлый основной акк в тг и не создал новый публичный, на который как раз за бабло ток можно ща написать не знаю нахуя он их смотрел, но довольно забавно)) скрин я уже не найду, да и впадлу
❤7
есть ещё забавная история с того времени я как-то по приколу переименовался в дурова и начал писать в чат, что это я настоящий, а он фейк блять хахвхвх он тогда на это отреагировал с приколом и попросил даника удалить меня, назвав «самозванцем», сказав, что у него якобы нет прав, а у него была админка в чате)) НУ А ЧЕ ВЫ ХОТЕЛИ МНЕ ТОГДА 16-17 ЛЕТ БЫЛО АХХАХА хотя я бы повторил это и ща ладно
🔥3😁2🥰1
я бы хотел дополнить эту историю это было в 2017-18 годах, у нас тогда был чат с дуровым и он в какой-то момент скинул туда какой-то видос поперечного и спросил нет ли у кого-то контакта мой хороший друг DANIK, который создал тот чат, был знаком с доброй половиной ру ютуба того времени, он их как раз тогда и связал))
🔥5☃1😁1
уселся)
❤7
свечь ка)
🔥3
батончег)
🍓8🥰3💅1
некоторое время назад ушёл из жизни Женя Шиндин — гений, приложивший свою руку к множеству треков проекта «ДУРА КРАСНАЯ» и просто прекрасный человек. мы очень хорошо сработались и с ним я набрал много опыта в работе с музыкой. это была просто идеальная командная работа, да и в целом он как человек был плюс вайбик. так уж получилось, что я об этом узнал только сегодня. завтра будет 40 дней с момента ухода его из жизн…
😭8👾1🕊1
моя нога оккупирована
🥰8🦄8💅4❤2🍓2
купальный сезон объявляю открытым ✅
🍓6❤1
☺️
❤🔥10❤3💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @nesterlox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Max Nester |
|---|---|
| Description | NPT Label owner, musician |
| Official site | https://nesterlox.net/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“макс нестер” (@nesterlox), 109 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nesterlox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.