Channel
@nesting_hq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003889343442 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nesting_hq |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 28 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nesting_hq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 35 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:43 | 34 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 33 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 32 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 32 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 48.3% | |
| 😍 | 16 | 13.6% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 11.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 7.63% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 5.08% | |
| 😎 | 5 | 4.24% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 2.54% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.54% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вчера было знакомство с братьями. Старший сразу проявил любопытство. Даже попросил взять Кирилла на руки. Младшему – ой! теперь уже среднему – надо было время. Я понимала, ни в коем случае не давить, ничего не предлагать, намеков не делать. Типа, не хочешь, ок. Вижу, жду, уважаю. Ждать я была готова сильно дольше. Но всё случилось неожиданно быстро. После скалодрома он зашел к нам ещё раз, намеренно показывая вы…
❤10
Еда с любовью Один из страхов, которые были у меня во время беременности, кто будет готовить еду, пока я восстанавливаюсь после родов и сфокусирована на налаживании грудного вскармливания. Я так была этим обеспокоена, что обсуждала это и с Пашкой, и с доулой, и с друзьями. Пашка успокаивал, что будет готовить всё, что мне захочется, пусть я только скажу. Короче, что мы справимся. И вот почти прошла первая неделя, …
❤8😍2
Когда родители перед твоим рождением медитировали по Динь с ребятами из Синтони
🐳4😍3❤1😁1
Channel photo updated
И каналу пришло время поменять иконку на
❤🔥8🎉6❤3🔥2🥰2
И Света тут цитату Снуп Дога подогнала, мне понравилось: «And last but not least a wanna thank me for believing in me» Я это сделала! Нет, мы это сделали 💪
🥰5😎5❤2😍1
Die Dritten lassen sich bitten, — говорят в Швейцарии. Зато потом рождаются очень быстро. 2 августа в 20:44 на свет появился новый человечек. У нас было наготове несколько имен, и мы взяли время почувствовать, какое ему больше подходит. Остановились на Кирилле. Записали на швейцарский манер, раз уж он тут родился. Ну и с отсылкой к оригиналу греческого имени создателя глаголицы – Kyrill. Кто знает, возможно, ког…
❤9🥰6🤗1
Мегалайфхак от сына в жару Заморозить упаковку винограда. Достать, ополоснуть водой, дать минут 5-15 отмерзнуть и voilà! Натуральное мороженное «фруктовый лед» готово к употреблению.
❤6👍3🔥1
Анонс выхода дружественного аппа Пока некоторые вынашивают детей, другие воплощают в жизнь свои идеи. Так, Денис хотел-хотел простой и понятный таймер для медитации с красивыми звуками и без всякого лишнего, а потом взял и сделал! Я краешком глаза подглядывала за процессом создания. Довела стрик непрерывных дней медитаций в инсайт таймере до красивой цифры 100 и ушла эксклюзивно в приложение Дениса. Братишка, ре…
❤7❤🔥1
День накануне ПДР запомнится - временем вместе с детьми, когда находились точки конекта (через музыку – заказывали треки в машине, и бургеры!) - купанием в озере - физио массажем диафрагмы, после которого дышать легче стало - закатом - полнолунием Спасибо, малыш, что дал нам возможность насладиться таким денечком 🫶
❤11😍10
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @nesting_hq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nesting_hq named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Штаб Гнездования” (@nesting_hq), 35 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nesting_hq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.