Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Комната людей👀👌

Channel

Комната людей👀👌

@nestwick

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

90subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001652463336
TypeChannel
Username@nestwick
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nestwick

Growth

8490876 August 2026 — 84 subscribers9 August 2026 — 84 subscribers14 August 2026 — 85 subscribers20 August 2026 — 84 subscribers28 August 2026 — 90 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–91 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 04:2690+6
20 Aug 2026, 19:0384-1
14 Aug 2026, 09:2685+1
9 Aug 2026, 17:1584no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:4184first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 63256484708666588354230.2%
custom 52491509357200178052417.3%
custom 6325806796246091512139.35%
🥰117.91%
85.76%
❤‍🔥85.76%
🔥75.04%
custom 523554568621209235864.32%
custom 534404634833952503264.32%
custom 523363160826682984742.88%
😁32.16%
😍32.16%
custom 577635147115502440621.44%
💯21.44%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC29 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Лефти и Марионетка враги? Может быть... Но это не про наших Лефти (@UnknowHardError000) Марионетка Фотограф #игра #фнаф #Марионетка

❤‍🔥8custom 52491509357200178054custom 52355456862120923581custom 63258067962460915121

6 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC31 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

❤️🥺🤩☺️

🥰11custom 63256484708666588355custom 63258067962460915125custom 52336316082668298472custom 52355456862120923582

5 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC33 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩Я в Кисловодске🤩

custom 524915093572001780510custom 63258067962460915123💯21custom 52336316082668298471

4 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC20 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @lunamoonshade

👽🧦™️🦄🛼🥑🐈™️🪀🍷 Представь, что мы делаем с тобой парный косплей. Кого будем делать и почему? 👁 Или кем ты меня видишь в пару к уже своему сделанному образу? 😇

custom 63256484708666588354

4 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC42 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🦋🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🦋 Знаете, мне всегда было интересно увидеть этот мир. Там, откуда я родом, всё слишком... Не важно, не будем о прошлом. Сейчас я здесь и могу делать, что пожелаю. Сейчас я бы хотела увидеть как падают звёзды с неба. А? Ты ожидал чего-то другого? Хах... Я же говорила, что могу удивлять😉 Фотограф #Субретка #игра #геншин

custom 63256484708666588358custom 63258067962460915124🔥2custom 53440463483395250322

3 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC55 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Не могли бы вы не сдерживаться в сражении со мной? Я уверена, что у вас достаточно сил меня ранить🥰 Фотограф #Субретка #игра #геншин

custom 6325648470866658835105custom 52355456862120923583🔥2custom 57763514711550244062custom 52336316082668298471custom 52491509357200178051custom 53440463483395250321

2 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC62 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я, кстати, вам не сказала, но на фестивале меня погладили по голове🥺🙄 С разрешения, конечно же🥰🥺 Подошёл один парень, сказал, что у меня очень красивый косплей и спросил, можно ли меня погладить аккуратно (чтобы парик не испортить). Я согласилась🙄🙄🙄

custom 63256484708666588359🔥3😁31

2 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC65 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Снялась у автора на Акамару🥺 Мой кусочек в самом конце видео🙄🙄🙄 04:06

custom 63256484708666588356😍3custom 534404634833952503231

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @nestwick. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Комната людей👀👌” (@nestwick), 90 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nestwick.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.