Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НеТЛАП🌱

Channel

НеТЛАП🌱

@netlap

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

4,428subscribers

+176 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001721655105
TypeChannel
Username@netlap
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/netlap

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

4,2494,4504,349.57 August 2026 — 4,252 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,249 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,270 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,284 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,291 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,302 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,308 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,302 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,314 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,312 subscribers8 September 2026 — 4,318 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,342 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,340 subscribers26 September 2026 — 4,450 subscribers5 October 2026 — 4,445 subscribers11 October 2026 — 4,437 subscribers14 October 2026 — 4,424 subscribers17 October 2026 — 4,426 subscribers20 October 2026 — 4,421 subscribers23 October 2026 — 4,422 subscribers26 October 2026 — 4,420 subscribers28 October 2026 — 4,413 subscribers1 November 2026 — 4,419 subscribers3 November 2026 — 4,428 subscribers4,4287 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 88 days, net +176. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,219–4,480 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 21:564,428+9
1 Nov 2026, 07:144,419+6
28 Oct 2026, 23:474,413-7
26 Oct 2026, 02:204,420-2
23 Oct 2026, 12:194,422+1
20 Oct 2026, 18:004,421-5
17 Oct 2026, 19:364,426+2
14 Oct 2026, 21:314,424-13
11 Oct 2026, 08:554,437-8
5 Oct 2026, 07:584,445-5
26 Sept 2026, 23:224,450+110
17 Sept 2026, 12:594,340-2
13 Sept 2026, 03:174,342+24
8 Sept 2026, 20:594,318+6
3 Sept 2026, 10:164,312-2
31 Aug 2026, 12:554,314+12
28 Aug 2026, 04:444,302-6
24 Aug 2026, 22:474,308+6
21 Aug 2026, 06:034,302+11
17 Aug 2026, 22:264,291first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

208 reactions across 21 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4421.2%
❤‍🔥3818.3%
❤3617.3%
👏157.21%
🆒146.73%
👌104.81%
💯104.81%
🙏104.81%
👀62.88%
😍52.40%
🤔52.40%
🤩41.92%
🤷‍♂41.92%
😎20.962%
🥰20.962%
🐳10.481%
💘10.481%
🤗10.481%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC150 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥2👏2😍2👌1🤷‍♂1

8 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC174 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥2👏2🤩2👌1🤷‍♂1

8 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC186 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥2👌2👏2🤷‍♂1

8 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC193 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤4👏2🔥2👌1🤷‍♂1

8 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC182 viewsread 8 August 2026

Есть пациенты, после приема которых еще долго ходишь с улыбкой. Сегодня именно такой случай. Ирина с порога сказала: «Я вас сейчас готова обнять... но не могу, потому что вы меня записываете» ❤️ И это неудивительно, ведь у нее было сильное выпадение волос, а со временем ситуация стала совсем тяжелой. Но Ирина, как сама про себя говорит, человек-воин. Поэтому сразу пошла в бой. Дорогие эмульсии, плазмотерапия, сыв…

7 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC315 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥8🆒5🙏4

7 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC319 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Очень многие боятся отказаться от миноксидила🫣 Кажется, что без него волосы сразу начнут выпадать еще сильнее, а весь результат исчезнет. Но проблема в том, что стимуляторы не восстанавливают зону роста. Если рецепторы чувствительны к миноксидилу рост волос возможен, но стимулятор не защищает и не восстанавливает зону роста, И как только ресурс фолликула заканчивается, эффект уходит. Причем откат настолько сильный,…

🔥4🆒3

6 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC416 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это работает‼️ Эти два слова мы слышим от пациентов чаще всего. Но за ними всегда стоит длинная история. Годы поиска причины. Десятки баночек, ампул и процедур. Диагноз «андрогенетическая алопеция». Разочарование после очередного обещания, которое не сработало. Именно поэтому такие отзывы для нас особенно ценны, потому, что пациент, который уже почти перестал верить в результат, вдруг начинает замечать то, чего да…

🔥8❤3👏3👌1🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC490 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если вы тоже задумываетесь о пластической операции, но боитесь потерять свою индивидуальность. приходите на консультацию. Мы подробно разберем именно вашу ситуацию и предложим решение, которое будет выглядеть естественно. 📞 +7 999 222-03-03 💬 Телеграм: @netlap_me 📱 Макс / Ватсап: +7 999 222-03-03 🌐 netlap.ru 📍 Москва, Шлюзовая набережная, 2А, м. Павелецкая

❤‍🔥4👌4🤔3

5 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC457 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Чей результат впечатлил вас больше?

  1. Ирины69%
  2. Ольги38%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC432 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥5💯4🤔2👏1

5 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC417 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

История Ирины не для слабонервных🫣 Неудачная блефаропластика, провалившиеся глаза, попытка исправить это филлерами… Одна проблема просто сменилась другой. Исправлять такие случаи всегда намного сложнее, чем делать операцию с нуля. Станислав Генрихович сначала устранил последствия предыдущего вмешательства, затем выполнил липофилинг собственными тканями и очень деликатно восстановил объемы и пропорции лица. Посмот…

❤‍🔥6🔥3🙏3😎2❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @netlap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

Чей результат впечатлил вас больше?

  1. Ирины69%
  2. Ольги38%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

Как вам работа Станислава Генриховича?

  1. 👏🏻 золотые руки53%
  2. 😍 великолепно53%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НеТЛАП🌱” (@netlap), 4,428 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/netlap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.