Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NetSkills

Channel

NetSkills

@netskills

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,597subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001009482662
TypeChannel
Username@netskills
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/netskills

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,5894,5994,5947 August 2026 — 4,589 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,589 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,598 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,595 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,599 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,597 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,594 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,593 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,594 subscribers8 September 2026 — 4,597 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,593 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,597 subscribers4,5977 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,588–4,601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 12:174,597+4
12 Sept 2026, 20:214,593-4
8 Sept 2026, 18:404,597+3
3 Sept 2026, 13:424,594+1
31 Aug 2026, 07:434,593-1
27 Aug 2026, 21:464,594-3
24 Aug 2026, 11:484,597-2
20 Aug 2026, 13:174,599+4
17 Aug 2026, 12:544,595-3
14 Aug 2026, 01:284,598+9
7 Aug 2026, 05:154,589no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:074,589first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 23 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

310 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13041.9%
👍9731.3%
4213.5%
😎103.23%
🙏72.26%
🤡72.26%
👎61.94%
🤔41.29%
👀20.645%
🤝20.645%
🤷‍♂20.645%
💯10.323%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC≈1,640 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://store.steampowered.com/app/4986050/Network__Cyber_Security_Simulator/ Что предлагает игра Игра позволяет познакомиться с сетевым оборудованием, которое обычно изучают только теоретически. Игроки открывают стойки в серверной комнате, осматривают интерфейсы коммутаторов и маршрутизаторов, работают с Ethernet‑кабелями RJ45 и настраивают порты — и на практике видят, насколько важно правильно устанавливать физиче

👍28🔥92

23 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC≈2,190 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#cheatsheet (pdf-версия в комментариях)

🔥28

10 Jul 2026, 05:19 UTC≈3,480 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Плохой отзыв тоже отзыв!)

😎10🔥4👍3🤔2

10 Jul 2026, 05:19 UTC≈3,180 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @alukatskyPhoto

Ознакомился с двумя книгами (на фото). Ну что сказать?.. Как говорилось в «Покровских воротах» «Искусство по-прежнему в большом долгу». Cisco ушла всего 4 года назад (про то, что доступ к сайту, к учебникам и материалам Сетевых академий остался до сих пор, промолчу), но вся архитектурная школа сетевой безопасности куда-то исчезла. Даже Cisco SAFE был детальнее, чем эти две книги, которые скорее про обзор некоторых ро

10👍9🤡7👎2🤷‍♂2

17 Jun 2026, 09:31 UTC≈3,830 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tssolutionPhoto

📊 TS Rate: Remote Access VPN Наш спецпроект TS Rate, где мы собираем сравнительные материалы по ИБ-решениям, продолжает расти. У нас серьезное пополнение — интерактивный инструмент для анализа решений удаленного доступа по наиболее востребованным* параметрам и функциям. 🛡 Удалённый доступ — одна из самых чувствительных зон любой инфраструктуры. Рынок меняется: появляются новые вендоры, развиваются отечественные пр

👍21👎1

17 Jun 2026, 07:26 UTC≈3,100 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://github.com/GyulyVGC/sniffnet - если вдруг кто-то пропустил, то вот максимально полезная утилитка для анализа трафика. Легкая альтернатива Wireshark

🔥10🤔2

11 Jun 2026, 07:39 UTC≈3,220 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @triztechPhoto

🚀 Две долгожданные премьеры PT NGFW. Один эфир. 29 июня в 11:00 на вебинаре покажем то, над чем команда работала последние месяцы. В прямом эфире мы впервые представим новую индустриальную модель PT NGFW 905i, разберем один из самых насыщенных релизов в истории продукта — PT NGFW 1.11, а главное — покажем вживую долгожданный Remote Access VPN. Инженеры, трепещите: будет железо (которое мы еще и поджарим), реальные

🔥43👍3

1 Jun 2026, 19:12 UTC≈3,520 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.cnews.ru/articles/2026-05-28_kto_i_gde_proizvodit_v_rossii_telekommunikatsionnoe

👍9

15 May 2026, 12:12 UTC≈4,180 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tssolutionPhoto

🔥 Новый урок уникального курса «PT NGFW Test Drive» уже ждёт вас на TS University! Это первая часть десятого урока курса по PT NGFW от технического директора TS Solution Евгения Олькова, в котором он расскажет про основы сегментации, реализованные в решении (VLAN-ы, VRF и Virtual Context) 🔴 Переходите по ссылке, чтобы смотреть все уроки курса. TS Solution в Telegram | в MAX | в VK

🔥151

15 May 2026, 12:12 UTC≈3,520 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Много рассказываю тут про основы сегментации, типовые дизайны с ngfw, без привязки к конкретному вендору

👍41💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @netskills. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ServerAdmin.ru
@srv_admin · 32,537
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Системный администратор
@i_odmin · 26,662
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NetSkills” (@netskills), 4,597 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/netskills.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.