Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Network Quiz

Channel

Network Quiz

@network_quiz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,529subscribers

-168 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001819461466
TypeChannel
Username@network_quiz
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/network_quiz

Growth

7,4287,6977,562.56 August 2026 — 7,697 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,695 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,651 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,625 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,577 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,554 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,532 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,494 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,489 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,456 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,428 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,529 subscribers7,5296 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days, net -168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,388–7,737 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 20:007,529+101
2 Sept 2026, 21:167,428-28
30 Aug 2026, 14:557,456-33
28 Aug 2026, 01:137,489-5
25 Aug 2026, 07:527,494-38
22 Aug 2026, 18:297,532-22
19 Aug 2026, 09:077,554-23
16 Aug 2026, 05:247,577-48
12 Aug 2026, 06:377,625-26
9 Aug 2026, 02:537,651-44
6 Aug 2026, 10:317,695-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:187,697first reading

Engagement

189 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.02%
avg views ÷ 7,529 subscribers
Avg views / post
453
121 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.917%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
121
of 189 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 118 of 121 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held189 (5 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total54,802
Reactions total499
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 33m
Average length
1m 57s

Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

719 reactions across 172 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍23332.4%
🔥17324.1%
10013.9%
👏7911.0%
😁456.26%
👌212.92%
👎202.78%
🤣172.36%
🙈60.834%
🤯40.556%
😢30.417%
😱30.417%
🌚20.278%
👨‍💻20.278%
😨20.278%
🥴20.278%
🎉10.139%
🏆10.139%
💯10.139%
🗿10.139%
3 further kinds30.417%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 186 of the 189 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 756 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 189 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC232 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

Демистификация IPv6 (Pdf) 📺 YouTube 👈 @network_quiz

👍2🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC391 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

После установки антивируса корпоративная почта перестала отправляться, интернет работает. Что проверить?

  1. Блокировку исходящих почтовых портов файрволом антивируса81%
  2. Настройки прокси-сервера в почтовом клиенте5%
  3. Лимит размера вложений на почтовом сервере1%
  4. Сертификат SSL/TLS почтового сервера12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍1👎1

28 Aug 2026, 05:07 UTC411 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Демистификация IPv6 (Видеоурок) 📺 YouTube 👈 @network_quiz

👏2🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC400 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

HTTP vs HTTPS в чем разница? @network_quiz

👍3🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC405 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

Демистификация IPSec VPN (Pdf) 📺 YouTube 👈 @network_quiz

👍2👌1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 189 posts we hold for @network_quiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 28 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz137 voters

После установки антивируса корпоративная почта перестала отправляться, интернет работает. Что проверить?

  1. Блокировку исходящих почтовых портов файрволом антивируса81%
  2. Настройки прокси-сервера в почтовом клиенте5%
  3. Лимит размера вложений на почтовом сервере1%
  4. Сертификат SSL/TLS почтового сервера12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTCAnonymous Quiz216 voters

На виртуальной машине закончилось место на диске, хотя внутри гостевой ОС места достаточно. В чём вероятная причина?

  1. Не установлены VMware Tools / гостевые дополнения12%
  2. Тонкий диск (thin provisioning) исчерпал выделенный пул хранилища73%
  3. Не настроена дефрагментация виртуального диска9%
  4. Диск подключён в режиме "только для чтения"6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz212 voters

После установки нового коммутатора часть устройств из разных отделов видит чужой трафик. Какая настройка была упущена?

  1. Настройка Spanning Tree Protocol4%
  2. Агрегация каналов (Link Aggregation)3%
  3. Разделение портов по VLAN92%
  4. Ограничение скорости порта (Port Rate Limiting)1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTCAnonymous Quiz63 voters

На коммутаторе обнаружены частые изменения MAC-адресов на одном порту. Что вероятнее?

  1. Ошибка DHCP или неправильная DNS-настройка11%
  2. Петля сети или подключение второго коммутатора86%
  3. Перегрузка процессора сетевого устройства2%
  4. Неверная маска подсети у клиента сети2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz218 voters

В Linux после изменения IP сервер перестал отвечать из другой сети. Что проверить?

  1. Default route и правила firewall системы96%
  2. Размер раздела диска и загрузку процессора1%
  3. Версию пакетов Linux и состояние служб1%
  4. Таблицу пользователей и права каталогов1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTCAnonymous Quiz246 voters

Почему BGP-сессия между маршрутизаторами находится в Idle?

  1. Неверный размер VLAN или режим trunk-порта12%
  2. Проблема DHCP relay или адреса клиента3%
  3. Ошибка DNS-зоны или локального кэша4%
  4. Ошибка TCP 179 или параметров соседства81%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 189 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Типичный Сисадмин
@sysodmins · 37,988
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
ServerAdmin.ru
@srv_admin · 32,531
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
IT Вакансии Казахстан
@workitkz · 35,173
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Network Quiz” (@network_quiz), 7,529 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/network_quiz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.