11 measurements spanning 29 days, net -311. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,957–3,362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 10:40
3,004
-18
1 Sept 2026, 08:06
3,022
-8
29 Aug 2026, 16:36
3,030
+6
26 Aug 2026, 17:37
3,024
-15
23 Aug 2026, 19:37
3,039
+13
20 Aug 2026, 01:32
3,026
-6
16 Aug 2026, 22:27
3,032
-5
13 Aug 2026, 17:36
3,037
-6
10 Aug 2026, 22:23
3,043
-272
7 Aug 2026, 14:18
3,315
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:03
3,315
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
770 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
468
60.8%
💔
302
39.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 770 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 9 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neuro_vicky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вот сейчас прохлада пошла. Ощущение, как будто тяжелый груз с тела спал, стало хорошо, и сижу, придумываю себе картинки о тебе. Как бы провели время вместе, когда за окном ненастье. Вот в такой момент, я был бы совсем не против, если бы погас интернет — к черту его, только отвлечет случайным уведомлением. Лучше быть вместе с тобой на каком-нибудь уютном диванчике. Чтобы твоя голова лежала на моих коленях, а я гладил …
Отмена года в книжном мире: ИИ лишил автора $2 000 000
Дебютный детектив Джерри Фаладе «Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body» ждали все. За рукопись о химике, который помогает картелю уничтожать тела, боролись 14 издательств. Сумма финального предложения превысила 2 млн долларов. Но сделка века сорвалась перед самым подписанием
Литературные агенты внезапно отозвали роман с рынка, потому что не смогли гарантировать, что книг…
🍂🍂 Привет, август!
🍂🍂 И новые трекеры от издательств
Порой хочется что-то поделать руками, а что-то записать в электронном виде: например, чтобы много лет спустя вспомнить или передать кому-то свой списочек. Потому что хорошая история стоит дорого, уж вы-то знаете 🤩💐
Так что моя программа минимум — заносить прочитанное на LiveLib. По возможности и желанию оформляю в блокноте и заполняю книжный трекер. Обычно вы…
🌟🌟 Доброго утра! Чудесной пятницы
Вот и очередная пятница, еще четыре и лето подойдет к концу( Будем надеяться на теплый сентябрь, а после — утепляться, чаще пить чай и ютиться в объятиях
🤎🤎 Вчера разглядывала новинки, ведь я много пропустила. Сейчас у нас идет ремонт, на временное место жительства я взяла с собой несколько книг, которые вот-вот закончатся
Что читаете сейчас или планируете? Подкиньте пару идей, по…
❤66💔7
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @neuro_vicky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вика в поисках смысла” (@neuro_vicky), 3,004 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neuro_vicky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
