Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нейрофикрайтерка

Channel

Нейрофикрайтерка

@neurofikwriterka

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

202subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002445366495
TypeChannel
Username@neurofikwriterka
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/neurofikwriterka

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

199204201.57 August 2026 — 201 subscribers8 August 2026 — 200 subscribers8 August 2026 — 200 subscribers22 August 2026 — 199 subscribers29 August 2026 — 204 subscribers8 September 2026 — 202 subscribers2027 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 198–205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 21:59202-2
29 Aug 2026, 13:47204+5
22 Aug 2026, 21:08199-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:32200no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:10200-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:29201first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

281 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 63275789298171926527526.7%
❤7024.9%
🔥3111.0%
custom 5283187018237484968279.61%
custom 5294240219652963125279.61%
custom 5334869231588619276207.12%
custom 5294277710422486087113.91%
custom 529175904281586451282.85%
custom 529666239652430946982.85%
custom 529434443273943179141.42%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC38 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какая обложка лучше?

  1. 1 - digital art, неоновое освещение57%
  2. 2 - типа как Гойя25%
  3. не знаю18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52831870182374849684

7 Aug 2026, 23:21 UTC38 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нужен совет. На какую обложку вы бы скорее кликнули в промо? Тематика работы: оридж, слэш, средневековое фэнтэзи, планируется макси. Сейчас создам опрос.

custom 52831870182374849687🔥6

28 Jul 2026, 21:40 UTC96 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот моя собственная визуализация Тани. Но это я и нейронка рисовала. А Элллль нарисовала! сама!!!!!! И она по-другому её видит. я просто в восторге диком. По сюжету у героини такая внешность, что она вызывает ассоциации с русалками. И Элллль так точно это передала! А я не смогла так со своей нейронкой. Через полчаса мы уже сидели на моей веранде, пили колу со льдом и ели беларусское печенье. Таня была снова укутана…

🔥10❤6custom 52831870182374849685

28 Jul 2026, 20:49 UTC76 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Добавила в реакции обычный огонь 🔥 и гачи с бутылкой 🍺 А то как-то было мало реакций, символизирующих красоту.

custom 52831870182374849687🔥5❤1

28 Jul 2026, 20:45 UTC79 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

О господи, это невероятно! Прекрасная Элллль нарисовала фан-арт на мою работу «Эквинокс»!!!!! Это Таня, второстепенная оригинальная героиня. Это первый фан-арт в моей жизни на мою работу. На оригинальную героиню, созданную мной 🤩 Просто ВААААААААУ 😍 И она прекрасна! Я восхитилась её бёдрами ещё до того, как поняла, КОГО Элллль рисует. Не поняла сразу потому что, блин, как вообще в такое можно поверить 😱 Очень по…

🔥10❤5custom 52831870182374849684

22 Jul 2026, 05:42 UTC123 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Режиссер «Района №9» и «Элизиума» Нил Бломкамп снял и опубликовал короткометражный фильм Nightborne полностью сделанный при помощи ИИ. Теперь на него нападают в соцсетях и обвиняют в предательстве «настоящего кинематографа». Фильм можно посмотреть на ютубе. Там можно включить русские автосгенерированные субтитры. Я проверила, качество перевода хорошее. Смотрите с осторожностью, сюжет интенсивный и неприятный. Мне оч…

❤8custom 52942402196529631254custom 63275789298171926524

16 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC161 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В последнее время у ИИ-хейтеров появился новый жанр: "я специально написала фанфик с ИИ, чтобы показать, как плохо ИИ пишет фанфики". Чувиха, ты показала только то, что ты не умеешь обращаться с этим современным инструментом. И тебя не устроил собственный результат. А тот факт, что по очень краткому и непродуманному промту нейронка выдала что-то осмысленное и похожее на завершенный фанфик - это следствие того, что…

❤16custom 52917590428158645128custom 52942402196529631255custom 63275789298171926523custom 52942777104224860871custom 52943444327394317911custom 53348692315886192761

5 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC184 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Придумала идею, посмеялась, а потом взяла и написала фанфик. Обложку пока не одобрили (да, она будет именно такая. Именно такой коллаж. Интересно, одобрят ли. Могут придраться к авторским правам на баннер с собственного сайта). Предыдущий пост с канала удалила, ибо там спойлер сюжета. Скачать текст работы можно в комментариях под постом ⬇️⬇️⬇️

custom 52942402196529631259❤7custom 63275789298171926525

4 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC159 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Видели новый конкурс от Фикбука? Ссылка на условия. Если вкратце, то они всего лишь просят написать истории по заданным тропам, похожим на сюжеты "Черного Зеркала". Не удивлюсь, если этот набор тропов был сгенерирован ИИшкой (и не осуждаю). Одним из условий, как и в предыдущих конкурсах фикбука, является запрет на генерацию текста с ИИ. На всякий случай напомню, что ни один детектор не даёт 100% гарантии. Если автор …

❤13custom 52943444327394317913

21 Jun 2026, 13:31 UTC149 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера было Солнцестояние, и в честь этого хочется напомнить о существовании моей работы «Эквинокс». Для этого воспользуюсь бинго-табличкой от сообщества ID0151. Мало кто читал «Эквинокс», а тем временем, это мой единственный завершённый макси, и стекла я там навалила будь здоров, всё по лучшим лекалам. Если что, не злые трагичные злодеи, смерть родителей и амнезия не мои, они из канона, но в фанфике они драматично ра…

custom 632757892981719265210custom 53348692315886192765❤3custom 52942777104224860872

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @neurofikwriterka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

Какая обложка лучше?

  1. 1 - digital art, неоновое освещение57%
  2. 2 - типа как Гойя25%
  3. не знаю18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нейрофикрайтерка” (@neurofikwriterka), 202 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neurofikwriterka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.