Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нью Курск

Channel

Нью Курск

@newkursk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

201subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001166975452
TypeChannel
Username@newkursk
Created5 December 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/newkursk

Growth

200201200.56 August 2026 — 201 subscribers7 August 2026 — 201 subscribers14 August 2026 — 200 subscribers21 August 2026 — 201 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 200–201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 23:57201+1
14 Aug 2026, 13:15200-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:02201no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:22201first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1420.6%
💯1319.1%
custom 54431464265676347121014.7%
🤣913.2%
🤔68.82%
👀45.88%
👏34.41%
🔥22.94%
🤪22.94%
🥱22.94%
🙈11.47%
🤡11.47%
🤯11.47%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Спасибо, так сказать, за деанон. Легче, правда, от этого не стало. Первые 2 в списке - нет вопросов, имеют давнюю публичную активность. Степан Метан имеет в тг аж 122 подписчика, ну ок, на других платформах побольше, но допустим мамкин блогер. Роман Киреев то же имеет блог на 1000 подписчиков, формально - ок. Бобрышев - блогер без блога. Последнее упоминание о нем - мастерские проектов, так себе блог, скажем честн

💯1custom 54431464265676347121

4 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC77 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Можно хотя бы фамилии этих блохеров услышать и чем примечательны? Многие лица не очень известны широкому обывателю. Блогеры, широко известные в узких кругах. https://t.me/masloverkursk/3646

💯5

29 Jul 2026, 19:40 UTC131 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Давно не было новостей что планируем на полугоре, непорядок. https://t.me/KurskAnomalia/29885

💯2

27 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC130 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что ж, стоит отметить - ушла эпоха. Конечно, это не эпоха Машошина, это эпоха Николая Цуканова, первого руководителя МУП Водоканал, замом которого и был Машошин. По крайней мере новый руководитель - действительно новый. Сможет он что-то изменить к лучшему в МУП Водоканал - увидим в ближайшем будущем, проблем там ворох. https://t.me/sekundamedia/37045

👀1

24 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC146 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну теперь похоже все, жаль, что не 4 года назад Но если не все, то мы не виноваты, как в прошлый раз.

👍3🤪2👏1

24 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC118 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О боги! Вокруг Красной площади отели перестали планировать, теперь начали осваивать площадь Перекальского? Да ладно, прошлые отели хотя бы постройте. https://t.me/kurskbomond/74065

custom 54431464265676347122

15 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC132 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А где вариант «стало хуже»? https://vk.ru/poll1021031710_1078816896

🤣4

10 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC188 viewsread 7 August 2026

Кажется, это фиаско https://t.me/KurskAnomalia/29667

10 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC164 viewsread 7 August 2026

Изначально, эти крайне любопытные граждане хотели получить 600+ млн. рублей. https://t.me/sekundamedia/36697

30 Jun 2026, 17:31 UTC172 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вангуем, что после открытия те де общественники будут первыми, кто скажет - а че всего 2 полосы? https://t.me/KurskAnomalia/29530

👍1

25 Jun 2026, 11:33 UTC203 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А это Курск вообще, краеведы? https://t.me/kraypress/8563

👀3custom 54431464265676347121

25 Jun 2026, 05:43 UTC152 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Выходит, управляющим компаниям можно на законных основаниях не косить дворы, пусть зарастают? Ну и штрафы за заросшие дачные участки тоже никто не отменял? https://t.me/sekundamedia/36350

🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @newkursk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нью Курск” (@newkursk), 201 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newkursk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.