Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 3DVision

Channel

3DVision

@news3DVision

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

757subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002294735391
TypeChannel
Username@news3DVision
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/news3DVision

Growth

7457577517 August 2026 — 745 subscribers8 August 2026 — 745 subscribers16 August 2026 — 746 subscribers24 August 2026 — 748 subscribers30 August 2026 — 750 subscribers8 September 2026 — 757 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 743–759 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 19:15757+7
30 Aug 2026, 01:04750+2
24 Aug 2026, 00:18748+2
16 Aug 2026, 06:52746+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:02745no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:31745first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 17s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

212 reactions across 15 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4923.1%
4219.8%
👍3617.0%
2411.3%
😁146.60%
🤣115.19%
🌭83.77%
👏73.30%
🤝52.36%
😍41.89%
🦄41.89%
🤩31.42%
❤‍🔥10.472%
🏆10.472%
💋10.472%
💯10.472%
😘10.472%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC105 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

❣️ Друзья, давно не показывали вам видео нашей внутрянки 💎Здесь Даня размышляет о лете и сканерах ✈️ Забираем регистрацию на форум - тут #КонсорциумАТЛаС #АддитивныеТехнологии

9👍6🔥3😁2🌭1💋1😘1

3 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC231 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔥 Июль оправдывает звание самого жаркого месяца - и мы решили не отставать! Собрали для вас максимум полезного: много металла, масштабных проектов, выставок и детальных обзоров. Приятного чтения! 🔥 📣 Наш дебют на выставке «Металлургия. Литмаш» позволил продемонстрировать возможности аддитивных технологий в литейной сфере во всей красе. Эксперты 3DVision консультировали всех желающих и и показывали, как 3Д печать мен

5🦄4🌭2🤩2🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC303 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

АКЦИЯ: Всё включено для работы 🔘 ⚡️ 3Д-сканеры Shining 3D + специальная цена + подарок С 29 июля по 5 августа мы запускаем специальное предложение на линейку профессионального оборудования Shining 3D. В акции участвуют как базовые, так и флагманские модели, закрывающие задачи разного уровня сложности. 🔘Shining 3D Einstar 🔘Shining 3D Einstar 2 🔘Shining 3D Einstar VEGA 🔘Shining 3D Einstar Rockit 🔘Shining 3D EinScan

👍8

27 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC342 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔺Друзья, недавно у нас состоялась продуктивная встреча с Роки - директором по продажам компании TOP. TOP - это ведущий производитель доп. оборудования для SLM-печати. Если коротко: их решения закрывают весь важный цикл работы с металлическим порошком и делают работу безопасной и эффективной. Без чего невозможна стабильная и качественная печать металлом: 💎системы безопасного забора порошка 💎 установки просеивания дл

9👍6🤝31

16 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC436 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥121

16 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC396 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤍 Деловая программа началась, и первый доклад «Как 3Д-сканирование меняет стоматологию и промышленность» от Михаила Кулика, генерального директора Scanline

👍41❤‍🔥1💯1

16 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC376 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4🔥3👏1

16 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC342 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎤Вступительное слово предоставляется Андрею Ивановичу Рудскому Доктору технических наук, профессору, ректору Санкт-Петербургского политехнического университета Петра Великого (СПБПУ)

👍511👏1

16 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC334 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍631👏1

16 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC315 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚙️ Друзья, доброе утро! «Вектор точности» открыт! Начинаем этот день с розыгрыша фотополимерного принтера Anycubic P1, поздравляем победителя 🙌🏼

👏4🔥2🤝21

15 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC297 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍 Друзья, всех ждем завтра на "Вектор точности" в Политехе! Подробности в закреплённом сообщении. Будет очень интересно!

9😁8😍41👍1🤩1

14 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC321 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какое у вас было самое интересное 3Д-сканирование и почему ❓

  1. 🪨 Камень22%
  2. Стейк 🥩35%
  3. 🍴 Вилки и ложки13%
  4. Олимпийская медаль 🏅17%
  5. 🍪 Печенье17%
  6. Футбольные бутсы ⚽️9%
  7. 🛥 Яхта26%
  8. Стульчак 💦22%

The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🌭2🔥21🏆1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @news3DVision. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Какое у вас было самое интересное 3Д-сканирование и почему ❓

  1. 🪨 Камень22%
  2. Стейк 🥩35%
  3. 🍴 Вилки и ложки13%
  4. Олимпийская медаль 🏅17%
  5. 🍪 Печенье17%
  6. Футбольные бутсы ⚽️9%
  7. 🛥 Яхта26%
  8. Стульчак 💦22%

The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“3DVision” (@news3DVision), 757 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/news3DVision.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.