КАБ Краматорськ-Словʼянськ
🙏18🤬2

Channel
@news6262
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,648subscribers
+537 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001754033639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @news6262 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/news6262 |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 10,648 | -16 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 10,664 | -23 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 10,687 | +15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 10,672 | +23 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 10,649 | +104 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 10,545 | +36 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 10,509 | +11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:29 | 10,498 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 10,516 | +11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 10,505 | +18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 10,487 | +12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 10,475 | +28 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 10,447 | +31 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 10,416 | +17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 10,399 | +14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 10,385 | +11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 10,374 | +69 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 10,305 | +86 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 10,219 | +4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 10,215 | first reading |
244 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 58 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 244 (6 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 85,176 |
| Reactions total | 1,116 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,048 reactions across 235 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,197 | 29.6% | |
| 😢 | 839 | 20.7% | |
| 🤬 | 830 | 20.5% | |
| 🙏 | 724 | 17.9% | |
| 😡 | 127 | 3.14% | |
| 👍 | 95 | 2.35% | |
| 💔 | 93 | 2.30% | |
| 😭 | 43 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 26 | 0.642% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 0.445% | |
| 🤔 | 16 | 0.395% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 0.222% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 0.124% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 0.124% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.099% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.074% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.074% | |
| 😐 | 3 | 0.074% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.049% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 0.049% | |
| 3 further kinds | 4 | 0.099% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 235 of the 244 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,048 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 244 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @news6262. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 244 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
КАБ Краматорськ-Словʼянськ
🙏18🤬2
29 серпня — День пам’яті захисників і захисниць України🕯️ Сьогодні ми вшановуємо захисників і захисниць України, які віддали своє життя за незалежність, суверенітет і територіальну цілісність нашої держави. Для Слов’янська цей день має особливий зміст. Наше місто знає ціну боротьби за Україну. Ми пам’ятаємо тих, хто захищав і продовжує захищати Донеччину, хто став на захист Слов’янська та всієї країни, хто не повер…
🙏25❤12
‼️ Слов’янськ: за добу троє поранених і одна людина загинула За добу, 28 серпня, російські війська обстрілювали Словʼянськ авіабомбами, БПЛА та FPV-дронами, — повідомив Вадим Лях. Пошкоджені багатоповерхівки, приватні будинки, магазини, підприємство та автомобілі. Троє людей отримали поранення. Усім надали необхідну медичну допомогу. 🔺Одна людина загинула. Лікарі до останнього боролися за її життя, але травми вия…
😢23❤1
Гучно
🙏21🤬4
🌿 Якби Донеччина мала свій аромат… Чим би вона пахла? Для когось — степовими травами після дощу та соснами Святогірська. 🌲 Для когось — сіллю й озерами Слов’янська, стиглими соняшниками або абрикосами з бабусиного саду. 🌻 А для когось її запах зовсім не про конкретне місце. Він про мамину випічку, літні вечори, знайому вулицю, дорогу додому і спогади, які завжди залишаються з нами. 💙 Гортайте карусель 👉 Можливо, …
❤32
💔 Ще один шрам на тілі Слов’янська. Зруйнований російським ударом міст. Перекритий рух, обірвані прольоти та пустка там, де раніше вирувало життя. Це не просто понівечений бетон, а ще один розірваний шлях до рідного дому. Реальність міста без прикрас. Надіслати новину📲 Підписатись на 6262💚
😢29🙏3❤1🤬1
🔴 Слов’янськ — територія активних бойових дій: що змінилося за місяць Із 21 серпня Слов’янськ офіційно віднесений до територій активних бойових дій. Раніше місто мало статус території можливих бойових дій. За словами начальника Слов’янської МВА Вадима Ляха, протягом останнього місяця російські обстріли значно почастішали. Водночас зросла кількість загиблих і поранених. Російські війська продовжують бити по житлові…
😢17🙏4❤2
🎙️ Агресія — це завжди про злість? Війна, страх і невизначеність змушують нас жити у постійній напрузі. Іноді гнів стає способом захиститися, але ми можемо несвідомо спрямовувати його на тих, хто поруч. У новому відео «Розмови з сенсом» разом із психологинею Альоною Головіною говоримо про справжні причини агресії та те, як навчитися проживати емоції безпечно. 🎥 Повний випуск «Розмови з сенсом»: https://youtu.be/GR…
❤3
Слов’янськ продовжують залишати жителі: скільки людей ще у громаді👇🏻 ▪️ У Слов’янській громаді зараз залишаються близько 30 тисяч людей, із них приблизно 25 тисяч — безпосередньо у Слов’янську. ▪️ До повномасштабного вторгнення у місті проживали близько 100 тисяч людей. Тобто нині там залишається приблизно чверть довоєнного населення. ▪️ Начальник МВА Вадим Лях зазначає, що люди продовжують виїжджати та вивозити д…
😢15❤3🙏1
🔺Росіяни змінюють підхід до Слов’янська: ISW фіксує нову активність Російські війська посилюють удари по Слов’янську та активізували просування зі сходу й південного сходу. В ISW вважають, що таким чином армія РФ створює умови для майбутніх наземних операцій. Аналітики також повідомили про інфільтрацію російських військових поблизу Рай-Олександрівки. Українські сили завдавали ударів по виявлених позиціях. Для прям…
🙏17🤬7❤4
‼️Одна людина загинула, троє постраждали під вогнем перебували 4 населених пункти Донеччини, — поліція Руйнувань зазнали 12 цивільних об’єктів, з них 5 житлових будинків. ▪️У Малотаранівці росіяни ударом FPV-дрона вбили мирного жителя на велосипеді. ▪️По Краматорську ворог бив переважно FPV-дронами – поранень зазнали троє людей, пошкоджено 2 багатоквартирних будинки й 3 цивільних авто. ▪️У Слов’янську пошкоджено …
😢8❤7🤬4
🏥 Чи треба змінювати сімейного лікаря після евакуації зі Слов’янська? Переїзд до іншого міста не скасовує декларацію із сімейним лікарем у Слов’янську. Якщо ви підтримуєте з ним зв’язок, переукладати декларацію лише через евакуацію не потрібно. Водночас ВПО можуть отримувати первинну медичну допомогу й за новим місцем перебування. А якщо переїхали надовго — можна обрати нового сімейного лікаря та укласти з ним декл…
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 244 posts we hold for @news6262. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@news6262 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🎒 До початку шкільного року залишилося зовсім мало. А Ви вже підготували своїх школярів?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 244 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@news6262 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Славянск ➔ Слов'янськ ➔ 6262” (@news6262), 10,648 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/news6262.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.