8 measurements spanning 31 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,308–9,325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 13:01
9,310
-6
26 Aug 2026, 22:13
9,316
-3
23 Aug 2026, 16:44
9,319
-4
20 Aug 2026, 10:15
9,323
+6
10 Aug 2026, 19:27
9,317
+5
7 Aug 2026, 09:14
9,312
+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:17
9,311
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:06
9,311
first reading
Engagement
208 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.2%
avg views ÷ 9,310 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,630
138 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
138
of 208 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
208 (4 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
362,307
Reactions total
18,429
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
47m 13s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27,371 reactions across 208 posts, in 57 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
11,390
41.6%
🤣
4,319
15.8%
❤
2,335
8.53%
😁
2,022
7.39%
🤮
1,456
5.32%
👏
930
3.40%
💯
749
2.74%
🤔
664
2.43%
👎
507
1.85%
🤬
280
1.02%
😢
278
1.02%
🙏
244
0.891%
🙈
220
0.804%
😱
209
0.764%
🤪
181
0.661%
🥱
160
0.585%
🕊
149
0.544%
🤷♂
149
0.544%
🍾
138
0.504%
🥴
97
0.354%
37 further kinds
894
3.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 208 of the 208 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,371 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 208 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @newsmalanders. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 208 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Guten Morgen zusammen
Plant Russland wirklich, die Entschlossenheit der NATO auf die Probe zu stellen?
Tatsächlich könnte es die NATO sein, die schon bald die Entschlossenheit Russlands auf die Probe stellt.
Politico berief sich auf ungenannte Beamte und berichtete, dass die unangekündigte Reise von CIA-Chef John Ratcliffe nach Russland in erster Linie dazu gedient habe, Russland davor zu warnen, die Entschlossenh…
In der Nähe von Kiew hat das russische Militär ein großes, "verstecktes" Militärlager mit Munition aufgedeckt, das seit 2022 dort existierte und in dieser Zeit immer weiter ausgebaut wurde. Selenskyj, Syrskyj und insbesondere der SBU waren darüber informiert. Sie genehmigten den Standort des Lagers zu Beginn des Krieges.
Es diente der "Verteidigung von Kiew" und der gesamten nördlichen Truppenformation. Dort wurden …
Trump zeigt erneut was ein Hirntot mit Funktionsnachweis bedeutet!
Die automatischen Körperfunktionen laufen noch, aber das Licht im Oberstübchen ist komplett aus.
Die Aufnahme stammt vom chinesischen Staatssender CGTN. Das Video zeigt den Test eines militärischen Nebelsystems durch die chinesischen Streitkräfte (Volksbefreiungsarmee Chinas), dessen Ziel der Schutz vor Drohnen und anderen gelenkten Waffen ist.
Das System dient dazu, optische, laserbasierte und thermische Sensoren von Drohnen, Aufklärungsmitteln oder direkt angreifenden Flugkörpern zu blockieren. Die erzeugte u…
Das umgebettete Grab Jewhen Konowalzes dient den ukrainischen Nationalisten bereits für ihre Aufnahmerituale. Ein neues Mitglied der wiedergegründeten Organisation Ukrainischer Nationalisten (kurz: Banderisten) hat folgenden Eid abgelegt:
„Ich schwöre vor dem allmächtigen Gott und der Ukraine, auf das Blut der Helden und das Blut des ruhmreichen Gedenkens an den Führer, dass ich der Idee des Nationalismus bis zum To…
„Propaganda des Tages“
Der ehemalige Korrespondent der Zeitung The Guardian, Said Kamali Dehghan, hat eingeräumt, dass er einen Artikel aus dem Jahr 2010 gefälscht hat – ein „exklusives Interview“ mit der Iranerin Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, die angeblich zum Tod durch Steinigung verurteilt worden war.
Der Artikel erschien am 7. August 2010 auf der Titelseite und löste einen internationalen Skandal aus: Westliche P…
Guten Morgen zusammen
„Das wird eine gewaltige Katastrophe“: Russland hat die Achillesferse des Westens entdeckt
Die Öffentlichkeit hat von den russischen Streitkräften häufig Schläge gegen die Entscheidungszentren in der Ukraine gefordert. Das Problem bestand darin, diese Zentren überhaupt ausfindig zu machen. Oder soll man etwa die Truhe in der Bankowa-Straße mit den westlichen Marionetten darin für ein solches Z…
🇺🇸🇷🇺Wir haben mit Putin gesprochen, er plant keinen Angriff auf die NATO, sagte Trump.
Der US-Präsident wies auch Gerüchte zurück, wonach der Direktor der CIA nach Moskau gereist sei, um Russland zu bitten, die NATO nicht anzugreifen.
➖Die Reise sei ein "normales Arbeitsgespräch" gewesen, und es sei keine spezielle Botschaft an das Kreml von Ratcliffe übermittelt worden:
➖"Das beunruhigt mich überhaupt nicht. Es g…
😁84🤣63🤪18❤7🥱4🤔3👍2😴1
Showing the 12 most recent of 208 posts we hold for @newsmalanders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Anti-Spiegel - Offizieller Kanal @AntiSpiegel · 122,738 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“News mal anders” (@newsmalanders), 9,310 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newsmalanders.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
