Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 26 days, net -3,537. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92,591–114,879 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 00:20
108,770
+10,141
4 Sept 2026, 23:22
98,629
-1,222
3 Sept 2026, 10:14
99,851
-1,069
2 Sept 2026, 05:43
100,920
-1,070
1 Sept 2026, 02:06
101,990
-961
30 Aug 2026, 22:37
102,951
+7,788
29 Aug 2026, 23:54
95,163
-2,212
29 Aug 2026, 03:17
97,375
-2,972
28 Aug 2026, 01:54
100,347
-3,427
27 Aug 2026, 01:26
103,774
-4,554
26 Aug 2026, 01:53
108,328
-753
25 Aug 2026, 01:15
109,081
-506
23 Aug 2026, 15:38
109,587
-514
22 Aug 2026, 03:27
110,101
-434
20 Aug 2026, 21:02
110,535
-488
19 Aug 2026, 23:33
111,023
-411
18 Aug 2026, 21:02
111,434
+2,600
17 Aug 2026, 19:29
108,834
-1,176
16 Aug 2026, 14:25
110,010
-1,243
14 Aug 2026, 20:17
111,253
first reading
Engagement
131 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.39%
avg views ÷ 108,770 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,780
115 posts measured
Reaction rate
57.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
115
of 131 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 114 of 115 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
131 (7 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
549,550
Reactions total
316,780
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Sept 2026, 07:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,130
Videos
≈1
Links
≈323
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
344,323 reactions across 129 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
55,369
16.1%
🎉
55,354
16.1%
🔥
55,346
16.1%
👍
55,191
16.0%
💯
24,772
7.19%
❤🔥
24,624
7.15%
🥰
24,578
7.14%
😍
24,556
7.13%
🤩
24,532
7.12%
😘
1
0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 129 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 344,323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐎⚡️ Cyber Horse NFT | کالکشن Neuro Nexus
اسب سایبری با قدرت، سرعت و شکوه آینده... یکی از خاصترین NFTهای این کالکشن. ⭐️
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🚀 قیمت شروع فروش: 0.02 ETH
📈 پیشبینی رشد: تا 0.177 ETH
💎 کالکشن: Neuro Nexus
👩🎨 تعداد عرضه: فقط 100 NFT
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
⚡ این مدل جزو NFTهایی است که عرضه محدودی دارد و بعد از تکمیل ظرفیت، امکان خرید با این قیمت وجود ندارد.
🐎 اگر به دنبال یک NFT خاص و آیندهدار هستی، این فرصت…
سلام دوستان عزیزم وقتتون بخیر🌹
✅ امروز ساعت 22:30 سیگنال داریم. آماده باشید.👍
برای خرید حداقل 0.02 (ETH) معادل تومانی ( حدوداً 10 میلیون ) تو کیف پولتون آماده داشته باشید برای ترید 📈
📊ضمنا اگر بخواهید میتونید چند عدد هم بگیرید مثلا اگر 5 عدد بگیرید به 0.1 (ETH) معادل تومانی ( حدوداً 50میلیون ) نیاز دارید و سودتون هم 5 برابر میشه✅
‼️🔹اگر سوالی داشتید میتونید با پشتیبانی ۲۴ ساعته کانال در ارتباط باشید
✉️ آیدی پش…
📣 اگر تازه به جمع ما پیوستید، این پیام رو حتماً تا آخر بخونید. 🌹
اول از همه، به خانواده ما خوش اومدید. ❤️
اگر فکر میکنید چون تجربهای در این بازار ندارید ممکنه نتونید از سیگنالها استفاده کنید، خیالتون راحت باشه؛ لازم نیست از قبل چیزی بلد باشید.
🎓 برای همین یک کانال آموزشی رایگان آماده کردیم که از پایه همه مراحل رو به زبان ساده توضیح میده.
💬 علاوه بر آموزشها، هر جایی که احساس کردید سوالی دارید یا به مشکل خوردی…
🔹 خبر مهم:
سیگنال فروش ، قبل از هر کاری یه نگاهی به بازار بندازید.
💡 احتمالاً وقت فروشه!
❗️❗️❗️توجه داشته باشید Stars رو فعال کنید❗️❗️❗️
✨ نوش جان! رفقا
🦚 🦚 🦚 🦚 🦚 🦚 🦚 🦚 ⭕️
💎 قیمت شروع: 0.02 ETH
📈 پیشبینی قیمت: تا 0.182 ETH
🔥 طاووس نماد شکوه، قدرت و خاص بودنه؛ این NFT هم با طراحی طلایی و جزئیات منحصربهفرد، برای یه ورود قدرتمند آماده شده.
⚡️ قیمت ورود هنوز روی 0.02 ETH قرار داره؛ جایی که فاصله تا تارگت پیشبینیشده خیلی زیاده.
🚀 تارگت نهایی: 0.182 ETH
⏳ فرصتهای خوب معمولاً وقتی همه متوجهشون میشن، دیگه قیمت شروع رو ندارن...
🦚👑 انتخاب با توئه؛ ورود در شروع مسی…
سلام دوستان عزیزم وقتتون بخیر🌹
✅ امروز ساعت 21:00 سیگنال داریم. آماده باشید.👍
برای خرید حداقل 0.02 (ETH) معادل تومانی ( حدوداً ۱۰ میلیون ) تو کیف پولتون آماده داشته باشید برای ترید 📈
📊ضمنا اگر بخواهید میتونید چند عدد هم بگیرید مثلا اگر 5 عدد بگیرید به 0.1 (ETH) معادل تومانی ( حدوداً 50 میلیون ) نیاز دارید و سودتون هم 5 برابر میشه✅
🔥347❤346🥰346❤🔥338😍330🎉327💯324🤩324
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @nftbazan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@nftbazan edited 16 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اد لیست تایم فارم | Add List TimeFarm @Timefarmire · 55,295 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کسب درآمد دلاری / آموزش NFT” (@nftbazan), 108,770 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nftbazan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.