Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 限制团队

Channel

限制团队

@nftjqr

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002329756477
TypeChannel
Usernames@feijipu @nftjqr
Created21 November 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nftjqr

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@nftjqr was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@nbnlb
held 12 August 202612 August 2026

Growth

34,7512,3777 August 2026 — 7 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,751 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,731 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,726 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,712 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,697 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,688 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,677 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 42 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 15:403-4,674
15 Sept 2026, 19:164,677-11
14 Sept 2026, 06:164,688-9
11 Sept 2026, 21:384,697-15
10 Sept 2026, 04:224,712-14
7 Sept 2026, 16:404,726-5
5 Sept 2026, 05:424,731-20
1 Sept 2026, 19:454,751+4,744
12 Aug 2026, 17:337no change
12 Aug 2026, 17:337no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:327first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2024 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC39 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

未上链 便宜出 66u一套 PG上分 @PGshangfen PG下分 @PGxiafen

4 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC35 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

UUUU商 NFT @uuuushang 做U商的老板可以拿下 88u 双位数

4 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC18 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

飞机创始人 NFT 帕维尔·杜洛夫 @paweierduluofu @paveldulovtelegram 成套出 168u

1 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

NFT 博彩 博彩 @b0cai o是0 直接当博彩用 性价比拉满

1

24 Jul 2026, 05:30 UTC83 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

新NFT 喜欢来报价😍 黑灰产🤖 @heihuichanbot

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nftjqr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“限制团队” (@nftjqr), 3 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nftjqr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.