Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nhiều Chuyện Đường Phố

Channel

Nhiều Chuyện Đường Phố

@nhieuchuyenduongpho

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

57,288subscribers

+915 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002768332903
TypeChannel
Username@nhieuchuyenduongpho
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nhieuchuyenduongpho

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

56,37357,39656,884.527 August 2026 — 56,373 subscribers27 August 2026 — 56,825 subscribers28 August 2026 — 57,053 subscribers29 August 2026 — 57,129 subscribers30 August 2026 — 57,183 subscribers31 August 2026 — 57,215 subscribers1 September 2026 — 57,220 subscribers2 September 2026 — 57,203 subscribers4 September 2026 — 57,233 subscribers7 September 2026 — 57,396 subscribers10 September 2026 — 57,386 subscribers12 September 2026 — 57,364 subscribers14 September 2026 — 57,366 subscribers16 September 2026 — 57,342 subscribers18 September 2026 — 57,288 subscribers57,28827 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 22 days, net +915. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,220–57,549 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:4157,288-54
16 Sept 2026, 00:4157,342-24
14 Sept 2026, 06:5857,366+2
12 Sept 2026, 14:3857,364-22
10 Sept 2026, 11:3757,386-10
7 Sept 2026, 07:5957,396+163
4 Sept 2026, 16:1957,233+30
2 Sept 2026, 23:4557,203-17
1 Sept 2026, 21:0657,220+5
31 Aug 2026, 18:5457,215+32
30 Aug 2026, 22:2457,183+54
29 Aug 2026, 23:4757,129+76
28 Aug 2026, 23:2457,053+228
27 Aug 2026, 23:3856,825+452
27 Aug 2026, 11:1556,373first reading

Engagement

171 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 57,288 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,830
150 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.235%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
150
of 171 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 148 of 150 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held171 (26 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total874,750
Reactions total2,032
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 16:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,730
Videos
≈2,220
Links
≈114

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 00m
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 133 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,619 reactions across 169 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤88133.6%
🤣44917.1%
😁35413.5%
🙏34513.2%
😢1294.93%
🤬1204.58%
😡1114.24%
👏501.91%
😭421.60%
🤡271.03%
👍170.649%
👻160.611%
🌚130.496%
💩120.458%
👎100.382%
🔥70.267%
🤔50.191%
🫡50.191%
🥰40.153%
😨30.115%
10 further kinds190.725%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 169 of the 171 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,619 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC≈2,110 views9 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

⚠️ ĐANG NGỒI TRÊN XE MẸ, NAM SINH LỚP 3 BỊ CỔNG CHÀO ĐỔ SẬP ĐÈ TRÚNG ĐỨT LÌA CÁNH TAY PHẢI Chiều 28/9, một xe cẩu va vào cổng chào bê tông ở xã Hương Khê (Hà Tĩnh), khiến công trình đổ xuống đúng lúc hai mẹ con đi xe máy qua. Nam sinh bị đứt lìa cánh tay phải và đã được đưa đến Bệnh viện Đa khoa tỉnh Hà Tĩnh cùng phần tay đứt rời; người mẹ thoát nạn. Theo lãnh đạo xã, xe cẩu không được phép đi qua cổng này. Nguyên…

🙏8❤1

28 Sept 2026, 11:16 UTC≈2,420 views11 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Khởi tố Dũng Trọc Hà Đông (cha nuôi của Khá “Bảnh”) Cục Cảnh sát hình sự, Bộ Công an phối hợp công an các địa phương đã phát hiện, triệt phá nhiều ổ nhóm dàn dựng video có nội dung bạo lực, giang hồ và cờ bạc rồi đăng tải lên mạng xã hội để thu hút người xem, kiếm tiền. Trong số những người bị khởi tố có Nguyễn Văn Dũng, tức “Dũng trọc Hà Đông”. Theo nội dung vụ án, Dũng tham gia đóng các video do Phạm Tiến Mạnh x…

😁7❤4

28 Sept 2026, 02:59 UTC≈3,910 views9 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video

Nam Định - 2 cháu đi mãi không về

😡6❤2🙏1

27 Sept 2026, 15:13 UTC≈4,830 views21 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

❗TNLĐ tại Đồng Nai khiến 1 người không qua khỏi 🙏

😢14🙏4❤2👍1

27 Sept 2026, 11:54 UTC≈5,230 views8 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video

Cập nhật Nguyễn Khuyến - Trần Nhật Duật 😂. Mưa lớn khiến nắp cống thường xuyên lạc trôi, vô cùng nguy hiểm với người đi đường.

❤8

27 Sept 2026, 04:01 UTC≈5,730 views21 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Ra đường gặp mấy thành phần này thì🙏 khổ thân cháu gái

😡14🙏6❤1

27 Sept 2026, 03:21 UTC≈5,580 views5 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video

Đoạn video được cho là từ Sanchore (Jalor).!! Sau khi cán qua, gã lái Scorpio còn chẳng thèm dừng lại Ấy thế mà, hỡi con người tử tế ơi, đáng lẽ phải dừng lại xem xét chứ chứ. 🙄

🙏5

26 Sept 2026, 12:09 UTC≈6,090 views10 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Vụ việc tai nạn giao thông nghiêm trọng xảy ra rạng sáng 26/9 tại KCN An Dương, Hải Phòng khiến 3 thanh tử vong Chi tiết: https://vnexpress.net/dam-vao-oto-dang-do-ba-thanh-nien-tu-vong-5124965.html

🙏6👏2❤1😁1

26 Sept 2026, 11:19 UTC≈5,330 views21 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video

Báo thủ thể hiện gây tainan giao thông 😡 “Các cháu ở nhà ngoan lắm còn ra đường thì: ...”

😁10💩8🙏2👍1

26 Sept 2026, 05:31 UTC≈5,770 views19 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video

Còn mặc áo học sinh mà cỡ này rồi 🙏

🤬14❤3🍌1🙏1

25 Sept 2026, 15:48 UTC≈6,520 views22 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video

‼️Biến căng ở chợ Tân Biên, Đồng Nai 😱

🤬15😁6❤1

25 Sept 2026, 14:31 UTC≈6,530 views12 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

🚨Tối 25/9, Tài xế lái chiếc Mercedes tông vào 6 xe máy, một ô tô đang chạy trên đường Đỗ Mười (phường An Phú Đông, TPHCM) khiến các phương tiện nằm la liệt, một người 💀

❤10🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 171 posts we hold for @nhieuchuyenduongpho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nhiều Chuyện Đường Phố” (@nhieuchuyenduongpho), 57,288 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nhieuchuyenduongpho.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.