Лдь рдй новый рендер вот практикую
❤10💘5❤🔥3custom 52652331658820008893custom 52626766596134835921custom 52628345297263816441

Channel
@nicullr404meh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002820739248 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nicullr404meh |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nicullr404meh |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 160 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 162 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 159 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 158 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 157 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 156 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
506 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 115 | 22.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 98 | 19.4% | |
| 💘 | 92 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5298763185287872355 | 52 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5265233165882000889 | 51 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5266966275380246014 | 35 | 6.92% | |
| 💔 | 32 | 6.32% | |
| custom 5262834529726381644 | 16 | 3.16% | |
| custom 5305652892651263144 | 8 | 1.58% | |
| custom 5262676659613483592 | 7 | 1.38% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 506 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nicullr404meh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Лдь рдй новый рендер вот практикую
❤10💘5❤🔥3custom 52652331658820008893custom 52626766596134835921custom 52628345297263816441
Го общаться
❤4custom 52987631852878723553❤🔥2
Горох 😂 прости😂 не умею рисовать😂 красивых😂 вот скетч 😂
❤20❤🔥7💘5custom 52669662753802460141custom 52987631852878723551
Гифт
❤🔥6❤1custom 52652331658820008891
Мне не понравилось
💔9
Все нинадо
💔13custom 52628345297263816449custom 52987631852878723556
Почему ты булих меня
💘13custom 52652331658820008898custom 52669662753802460145custom 52987631852878723553❤1
Реквест кто не понял это Маэно
❤🔥17❤12custom 529876318528787235510💘2
Я и моя любов всем привет короче у меня не было инета 3 дня Последрийй арт с таким ренжпром наверное
❤🔥18custom 526523316588200088911💘6custom 52628345297263816443custom 52987631852878723553❤2custom 53056528926512631442
Бля подождите я рисую потом уеду поезд нет интернета рисовать будет
❤🔥13💘5custom 52987631852878723554custom 52626766596134835922custom 52669662753802460142❤1custom 52628345297263816441custom 52652331658820008891
Все в пизду с фоном лень было Не судите строго первий арт после арtблока~~
❤🔥11❤6custom 52987631852878723556💘3custom 52669662753802460142
Приветик аот пока только чибики
💘12❤7custom 52669662753802460145custom 52652331658820008892❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nicullr404meh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Niculer404” (@nicullr404meh), 160 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nicullr404meh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.