Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نیگرستان(بهشت‌دخترخانوما)

Channel

نیگرستان(بهشت‌دخترخانوما)

@nigerstan9

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

12,345subscribers

+2,270 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003962594006
TypeChannel
Username@nigerstan9
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 22 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nigerstan9

Growth

10,07512,34511,21024 August 2026 — 10,075 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,214 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,238 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,604 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,312 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,362 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,369 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,343 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,340 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,377 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,219 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,345 subscribers24 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 12 days, net +2,270. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,735–12,686 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 16:3912,345+126
3 Sept 2026, 15:0112,219+842
2 Sept 2026, 06:0311,377+37
1 Sept 2026, 06:3811,340-3
31 Aug 2026, 09:0211,343-26
30 Aug 2026, 06:4611,369+7
29 Aug 2026, 10:0711,362+50
28 Aug 2026, 10:2511,312+708
27 Aug 2026, 07:2710,604+366
26 Aug 2026, 04:2310,238+24
25 Aug 2026, 02:3210,214+139
24 Aug 2026, 04:4510,075first reading

Engagement

267 posts held, back to 22 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 12,345 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
267 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
267
of 267 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 260 of 267 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held267 (22 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total349,779
Reactions total16,074
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49m 40s
Average length
6m 13s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16,074 reactions across 260 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣7,95249.5%
2,97918.5%
👍1,2958.06%
👎1,0066.26%
💋7744.82%
🤓7714.80%
🔥7244.50%
custom 53256505524391926105023.12%
custom 5911424911259210152710.442%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 260 of the 267 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,074 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 267 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 267 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nigerstan9. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 267 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 23:11 UTC471 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026

آقا من تسلیم شب بخیر 🤣🤣🤣🤣

🤣24

Signed -AmiR

2 Sept 2026, 23:11 UTC471 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026

باو کسننت بدت بیاد تو دیگه چه جونوری هستی🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

🤣227

Signed -AmiR

2 Sept 2026, 23:10 UTC471 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026

تازه فهمیدم مادرجنده به من میگه مانی بیپ؟

👍17🤣42

Signed -AmiR

2 Sept 2026, 23:09 UTC504 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026

دیگه بت نمیپردازم پسرم کسننت شد رفت

🔥16🤣3

Signed -AmiR

2 Sept 2026, 23:06 UTC535 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026

از چتای فیکی که ساختی از افشاهای فیکی که زدی اون هویت فیکی که به اسم من زدی همشون کم کم لو نرفت که هیچ الان کل ملت فهمیدن مادرت جندست دیگه بگیر بخواب

👍15🤓32🤣2

Signed -AmiR

2 Sept 2026, 23:03 UTC535 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026

از یه مادرجنده ای خایمال انتظاری بیشتر از این نمیرفت

👍16🤣54

Signed -AmiR

2 Sept 2026, 22:19 UTC873 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026

چت فیک درست میکنی عین آدم درست کن مادرجنده من خواستار ثکثچتم با مهشیدم

🤣238💋8👍7

Signed -AmiR

2 Sept 2026, 22:18 UTC871 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026

بعدشم مادرجنده من کی بغل اسمم پرچم برزیل بوده همیشه انگلیستان بوده کسننه

🤣30👍105

Signed -AmiR

2 Sept 2026, 22:15 UTC927 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026

به این کاظم مادرجنده بگو وقتی بحث ویو باشه که انقدر سین نداری فور میدی پستات رو چنل پرستش اون دوتا ممبرای ریتارد هم که داری با عکس و نود دخترای عادی رفته بالا و یه مشت بی غیرت دنبالش میکنن دیگه به چیت مینازی هرشب میخوای از کیر یکی بری بالا تا شاید ویو بیشتری گرفتی ول کن کیر دیگران شو دیگه همون چنل پرستش پستات فور بزن تا شاید یه چیز گیرت بیاد باور کن بقیه کارو زندگی دارن

👍31🤣95

Signed -AmiR

2 Sept 2026, 22:14 UTC924 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026

برید اون یکی چنل بهش بخندید من که دیگه خسته شدم

14🤓5🤣4

Signed -AmiR

2 Sept 2026, 22:12 UTC920 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026

مانی بیپ اوکی تو بردی بزار بخوابیم مادرجنده چشام پف کرد

👍11🤣63

Signed -AmiR

2 Sept 2026, 22:11 UTC931 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

یارو چت فیک زده از ارشیا بعد به ارشیا میگه ثابت کن اون چته خودت نبودی در همین حد کودکه طرف من با چی این کل کل کنم🤣🤣🤣

🤣124

Signed -AmiR

Showing the 12 most recent of 267 posts we hold for @nigerstan9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@nigerstan9 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نیگرستان(بهشت‌دخترخانوما)” (@nigerstan9), 12,345 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nigerstan9.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.