全款拿下iPhone17
👏19🥰1

Channel
@nijigen_emby
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,919subscribers
-77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001327967885 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nijigen_emby |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nijigen_emby |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 10,919 | +4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 10,915 | +10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 10,905 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 10,910 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 10,912 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:35 | 10,915 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:26 | 10,914 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:25 | 10,920 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 10,921 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 10,922 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 10,928 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 10,929 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 10,935 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 10,941 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 10,942 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 10,953 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 10,955 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 10,956 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 10,966 | -12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 10,978 | first reading |
52 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (25 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 11,828 |
| Reactions total | 73 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
674 reactions across 38 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 187 | 27.7% | |
| 🙏 | 70 | 10.4% | |
| 👍 | 61 | 9.05% | |
| 🤣 | 48 | 7.12% | |
| 😢 | 45 | 6.68% | |
| 🌚 | 33 | 4.90% | |
| 😱 | 32 | 4.75% | |
| 😁 | 30 | 4.45% | |
| 😭 | 27 | 4.01% | |
| ⚡ | 26 | 3.86% | |
| 🥰 | 25 | 3.71% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 3.56% | |
| 🫡 | 18 | 2.67% | |
| 🤯 | 17 | 2.52% | |
| 🤗 | 15 | 2.23% | |
| 💊 | 6 | 0.89% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 0.742% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.297% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.148% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.148% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.148% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 674 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
全款拿下iPhone17
👏19🥰1
Channel name was changed to «二次元emby 开学快乐»
屈原是溺水寒,司马迁是蛋宰派对 穿袜子其实是包脚子 迁怒,其实是挪威 拼豆,其实是陈粒 魔杖,其实是法棍 接吻,其实是顶嘴 怀疑,其实是微信 仓颉,其实是字母 眼镜,其实是士力架 包粽子,其实是纳米 指南针,其实是方向盘 择良辰,其实是比利时 炸蘑菇,其实是高温杀菌 荆轲刺秦,其实是螺旋赶君 众宾欢也,其实是齐齐哈尔 哪吒闹海,其实是来龙去脉 引经据典,其实是依古比古 种族歧视,其实是以色列人 武大郎请客,其实是高朋满座 孟德斯鸠,其实是曹操这个鸟人
🤣8🌚1
真拿你没办法,坐好喽 「烟」和「火」互相碰撞就是能产生假想香烟爆发的「尼古·丁」 但此时空中的「烟」与当时绕场一圈击中房东的那次一样,在点燃之前速度并不算快。药喵只要比「火」先一步接触到「烟」完成适应的它就可以轻松的将这包七星消除,成功阻止「烟」和「火」点燃 此时已经十分接近「烟」的药喵脑海中已经开始浮现「戒烟成功」的想法,没想到尼古喵居然凭借「烟」的引力直接出现在他和「火」之间! 尼古喵甚至都不需要选择二手烟对象,因为药喵对于「烟」的适应让他完全不受尼古丁的影响,这个千年来近乎耐药的能力居然在这个时候成为尼古喵逆转战局的关键! 药喵将大嘛针管横在面前却依然无法阻挡尼古喵充满烟臭的重拳,房东也终于在此时回到公寓并摆出了「半人马」的起式,他想要在他们碰撞之前用手中射出的金子将「烟」提前熄灭 尼古喵瞬间出现在房东面前,但他的拳头却无法阻止已经射出的「金子」! 房东看着即将命中「烟」的水柱不忘嘲讽自己的对手「烟瘾太大」尼古喵却在这个时…
世界那么大,我想去看看 可惜房东不让卖房
❤14
太恐怖了,中元节都过去了还有鬼。我刚刚在路上走着,突然看见一个老爷爷被挂在一栋房子的墙上死死盯着我看,然后我就不受控制地走进了那栋房子。还好里面有一些服装统一疑似道士的人说可以给我驱魔,只要支付50元,让我吃下一些尸体碎块和黑色药水就能好了,有没有人可以帮帮我
❤10👍2
真拿你没办法,那坐好喽 “【九纲】【偏光】【乌与声明】【表里之间】” 此时战场之中再没有任何人可以阻止「苍」与「赫」互相靠近了。 “「虚式·茈」” 充斥天地的紫色光辉仿佛利剑一般刺入所有人的双眼,当其中蕴涵的可怕力量开始喷涌时,这座城市便在假想质量的爆发中渐渐粉碎,曾经代表着浮世繁华的高楼与街区此刻都无法抵挡来自「最强」的无差别攻击,原本能够适应一切的法轮也在紫色光芒的吞噬下彻底化为齑粉。 当一切归于平静,他们所处的街区也成为一片废墟。自烟尘中踉踉跄跄走出的,是已经失去了左手,同时身体各处都破败不堪的宿傩。似乎是来自战场的嘲讽,就连他依靠的半堵围墙也在此时直接倒塌。 而作为他对手的五条悟也开始了颇具嘲讽意味的战斗复盘。 “不指定术式对象,就连我自己也会被卷进去的,无限制的「茈」……但是,受伤的程度却不太一样呢,看来是不是自己的咒力影响很大啊。不过……结果好就行了吧,即兴创作的远距离操作「茈」,好像完成的还不错?这还是我第一次自爆…
中元节大伙多注意,我今天上厕所,在镜子里看到了个穷鬼
😢17
↗↘↗↘ via 匿名
❤1
零债务。 每晚7-8小时睡眠。 低体脂率。 营养完美。 心理健康正常。 零酒精且极度补水。 这是我的巅峰。我当时8岁。
😭27🌚4
不喜歡《無職轉生~到了異世界就拿出真本事~》的朋友們可以看《五指轉生~到了西天前就要拿出真本事~》它在《這本清小說真厲害!》裡面拿到前四名的好成績 順帶一提另外三名是《超超超喜歡你的一百零七個結拜兄弟》、《敗犬女主太多了》跟《三等分的天下》都是家喻戶曉的名作
🥰17😁2❤1🤬1
[#Update] 7月新番基本补齐,剩余的需要时间下载。 服务器的故障依然维护中
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @nijigen_emby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“二次元emby 开学快乐” (@nijigen_emby), 10,919 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nijigen_emby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.