Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ника Зебра | Деньги и известность

Channel

Ника Зебра | Деньги и известность

@nika_zebra

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,517subscribers

-322 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001437609007
TypeChannel
Username@nika_zebra
DescriptionКак стать известным и богатым. Рекламу не даем. Роском: https://clck.ru/3GXJnq
Created3 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nika_zebra

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,51712,83912,6787 August 2026 — 12,839 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,839 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,828 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,826 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,821 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,820 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,818 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,810 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,809 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,801 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,795 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,787 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,788 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,787 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,789 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,783 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,782 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,775 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,769 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,765 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,763 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,758 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,754 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,747 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,737 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,731 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,721 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,706 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,702 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,697 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,694 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,696 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,694 subscribers26 September 2026 — 12,675 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,645 subscribers9 October 2026 — 12,632 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,619 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,601 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,600 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,578 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,572 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,568 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,564 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,565 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,555 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,550 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,549 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,548 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,546 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,542 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,539 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,533 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,531 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,530 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,529 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,527 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,525 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,523 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,517 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net -322. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,469–12,887 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 17:1512,517-6
3 Nov 2026, 15:2812,523-2
2 Nov 2026, 12:2012,525-2
1 Nov 2026, 11:5812,527-2
31 Oct 2026, 13:3912,529-1
30 Oct 2026, 14:3612,530-1
29 Oct 2026, 13:5912,531-2
28 Oct 2026, 14:1012,533-6
27 Oct 2026, 16:4612,539-3
26 Oct 2026, 19:3712,542-4
25 Oct 2026, 20:2012,546-2
24 Oct 2026, 22:2012,548-1
23 Oct 2026, 19:1812,549-1
22 Oct 2026, 21:1712,550-5
21 Oct 2026, 14:5512,555-10
20 Oct 2026, 11:0112,565+1
19 Oct 2026, 13:5012,564-4
18 Oct 2026, 13:0612,568-4
17 Oct 2026, 12:4812,572-6
16 Oct 2026, 14:1612,578first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.46%
avg views ÷ 12,517 subscribers
Avg views / post
934
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held33 (29 May 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total12,137
Reactions total589
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 18:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,010
Videos
≈256
Links
≈546

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,796 reactions across 32 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥84346.9%
❤60633.7%
😁1146.35%
💯814.51%
👏623.45%
😱452.51%
🦄160.891%
🌚150.835%
👾80.445%
🤩60.334%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,796 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 33 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nika_zebra. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 May 2026 to 27 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (53.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

27 Oct 2026, 11:39 UTC649 views29 reactionsread 4 November 2026

К чему я. Когда даешь личный контент, а не личный дневник - это снимает драму с «аааа, это же про меня». Нет. Это ЧЕРЕЗ тебя. В разных темах: хобби, здоровье, деньги, отношения, инсайты. Вот об этом снимайте ❤️

❤22🔥7

27 Oct 2026, 11:37 UTC650 views32 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥21❤7😁4

20 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,170 views54 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

⭕️⭕️ Вот Карта иммунитета к изменениям Работает и для простых случаев ("не могу начать нормально вести Тг"), и для сложных ("хочу денег, но делаю кажется что-то не так"). Как пользоваться: выше аудио ~15 мин. Сама книжка в комментах.

❤36🔥15👏3

20 Oct 2026, 13:27 UTC996 views84 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Voice message

🎤ПОДКАСТ КАРТА ИММУНИТЕТА К ИЗМЕНЕНИЯМ 🎤 Что делать, если вы застряли и никак не можете решиться. Карту часто даю клиентам, когда работаем с темой денег, роста и "всё знаю, но не делаю". Сейчас саму карту нарисую Будет 50 🔥, дам технику против откладывания

🔥72❤8👏4

19 Oct 2026, 09:17 UTC≈1,020 views42 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Ожидание удобного времени - н@ркотик бедных. Фразу приписывают Рокфеллеру, но подтверждений не нашла.

🔥30❤11👾1

16 Oct 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,150 views25 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Клиентский отзыв. Прекрасно для пятницы, я считаю ✅ Всё, до встречи завтра на эфире тут.

🔥19🤩4💯2

16 Oct 2026, 13:17 UTC≈1,090 views41 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

😱БЕСИТ НАЧИНАТЬ СНАЧАЛА. В 2022-2023 меня сильно вынесло из-за эмиграции, блокировки Инсты и развода. В голове было "я же все делала правильно, почему ТАК?". Потом весной 26 повторилось ) ЭТО МЫСЛЬ О НЕСПРАВЕДЛИВОСТИ. ТАК ВОТ. ОНА НЕПРОДУКТИВНА. Стоит на идее, что за все воздастся по трудам. Вообще не факт. Можно быть очень старательным, при этом несчастным и бедным как церковная мышь. Мир несправедлив. Мысли о "а …

❤30🔥11

16 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC814 views34 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Я: придумываю сезонные продукты Вы: ... может🍷? Я: 🗿🗿🗿 Несколько лет назад я такое продавала: страт. сессии, 2 часа, 150-300 тыс руб. Собирали с клиентами стратегии роста, где деньги и что менять. Если добавить бутылку красного, неплохой сезонный продукт😁 Кстати. Про сезонные продукты завтра буду для психологов говорить. 17 октября 12:00 мск "Что продавать психологу и коучу осенью '26, чтобы удвоиться". Разберем …

🔥22😁12

15 Oct 2026, 17:23 UTC894 views16 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Poll

🧂 Как вам этот новый формат?

  1. 🤩Мне нравится, продолжай86%
  2. 😕Ну чёт не знаю7%
  3. 🔈 Больше люблю аудио и кружочки14%
  4. 😭 Тг не грузится, всё плохо1%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥9❤5👏2

15 Oct 2026, 16:47 UTC818 views60 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Куда идти, если вокруг случился ПЗДЦ. Целая пачка таких вопросов. Вот еще: "💬 Хорошо рисовать точку б, если ты понимаешь что там. А если в 40 ты вдруг неожиданно обнулился и понимаешь, что сейчас ты не знаешь кто ты и куда ты хочешь дойти" БУДЕТ НЕПРИЯТНОЕ. За последние 5 лет многие из нас думают, что обнулились. А некоторым еще предстоит - сыпятся рынки, доходы, инфляция, ИИ вытесняет ряд профессии (Я ПОМНЮ ПРО И…

❤43🔥16👏1

14 Oct 2026, 13:40 UTC907 views67 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

👆Въебывать. Это лучшее время, чтобы въебывать, тестировать, набирать разный опыт, тестировать себя, интересы, учиться всему сразу. Моей дочери почти 11. Ей я сказала бы то же самое. Просто пораньше, а не в 20. Мир изменился. После 25 - начинаются семья, дети, сон, хвост отваливается, когнитивка тоже не такая бодрая и после веселой тусы до утра с подружками в 30+ ты уже не можешь в 8 идти на работу. ❗❗Я ВАМ ЧУТЬ ПО…

🔥42❤21😁4

14 Oct 2026, 13:20 UTC839 views48 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Разбираю анонимные вопросы. Сначала не могла понять, что за вопросы про Вконтакте. А потом как поняла... В посте выше написано: "Я бы начала с контакта. Будем ощупывать себя и реальность". С КОНТАКТА 😂😂 С аудиторией. Вконтакте, Макс, телега, инста... это вторично. Контакт - это искренний интерес к тому, что там тебя читает с экрана (да, вот ты, например). Я в интернетах с 2008, в 2009 входила в "Золотую сотню авт…

❤33🔥15

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @nika_zebra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Oct 2026, 17:23 UTCAnonymous Poll155 voters

🧂 Как вам этот новый формат?

  1. 🤩Мне нравится, продолжай86%
  2. 😕Ну чёт не знаю7%
  3. 🔈 Больше люблю аудио и кружочки14%
  4. 😭 Тг не грузится, всё плохо1%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ника Зебра | Деньги и известность” (@nika_zebra), 12,517 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nika_zebra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.