Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for kolyapryazhentsev

Channel

kolyapryazhentsev

@nikolaprazhe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

221subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001623972652
TypeChannel
Username@nikolaprazhe
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nikolaprazhe

Growth

2172212198 August 2026 — 218 subscribers8 August 2026 — 218 subscribers15 August 2026 — 219 subscribers23 August 2026 — 217 subscribers31 August 2026 — 221 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 216–222 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 05:13221+4
23 Aug 2026, 08:46217-2
15 Aug 2026, 02:08219+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:35218no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:36218first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 22s
Average length
4m 41s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2074.1%
🕊725.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC30 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @musicalnykrayoriginal

Posted without readable text

3

7 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC33 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @musicalnykrayoriginalPhoto

В этом году исполнилось 20 лет альбому «Valve ice» группы Virgo Intacta. Альбом переиздан в 2026 на виртуальном лейбле Izhitsa. Слушать на Bandcamp, Spotify, Apple Music, Яндекс Музыке и ВК Стоит заметить, что ранее этот альбом уже издавался во время очередной инкарнации лейбла «Ижица». В сети всё ещё доступна другая его расширенная версия из двух частей с альтернативными обложками и трек-листами. Любителям поискат

1

7 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @musicalnykrayoriginal

Клип проекта Soda на трек «Мне очень жалко» с альбома «Deshevle!». Компакт-диск с альбомом всё ещё можно купить в интернет-магазине. #underwaterizhevsk #musicland #arheologya #video

1

30 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/PbPNfUrnelw?si=WTdCV5g0blu6ePaG

1

23 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC115 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @musicalnykrayoriginal

В июне 2016 участник группы «Вторая Африканская Охота» Влад Цветков пришел на питерское радио «Фонтанка» и наговорил там всякого. Цитируем сайт радиостанции. Почему рейверы 90-х стали «офисным планктоном» В 90-е годы с подачи модных музыкальных журналов появилось понятие «ижевская электроника». Именно тогда Ижевск стали называть «столицей русской электронной музыки». Почему так произошло и как сейчас обстоят дела в

1🕊1

23 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @musicalnykrayoriginalVideo

При всей любви ижевского искушённого слушателя к IDM на концерт метров жанра из Петербурга почти никто из тусовки форума EED не пришел. Живой сет «Ёлочных Игрушек» в ноябре 2007 года прошел в на треть заполненом клубе. Возможно аудиторию распугал необычный вокалист из группировки «Ленинград» в малиновом пиджаке. Барецкий всё же тема на любителя. Нашелся интересный телесюжет с интервью и концертными съемками группы.

🕊1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @nikolaprazhe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kolyapryazhentsev” (@nikolaprazhe), 221 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikolaprazhe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.