Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NI.IVINA

Channel

NI.IVINA

@ninixys

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

153subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002930133047
TypeChannel
Username@ninixys
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ninixys

Growth

153166159.524 August 2026 — 153 subscribers25 August 2026 — 166 subscribers1 September 2026 — 153 subscribers24 August 20261 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151–168 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 10:17153-13
25 Aug 2026, 05:29166+13
24 Aug 2026, 20:30153first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
103.9%
avg views ÷ 153 subscribers
Avg views / post
159
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
43.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held7 (4 August 202624 August 2026)
Views total477
Reactions total207
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

465 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥11524.7%
custom 54517448050653514889019.4%
custom 54337857472094749016814.6%
custom 52086133593431432286012.9%
custom 54451280944132597045912.7%
367.74%
custom 5445339020257169585306.45%
custom 525572357141771947971.51%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 465 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC50 views41 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Дорогие!! Пока я решила взять перерыв в модельной деятельности, всё же расскажу о том что задумала) Самое животворящее это то что меня внезапно осенило и я решила что хочу отучиться на стилиста🤭 Пока я ещё в разработке этой задумки!! Но это не будет моей помехой в том что бы пересилить себя и начать снимать влоги, и перестать откладывать то чего я давно хотела из-за всяких мелочей по типу «не красивая картинка» «не у

custom 545174480506535148815custom 520861335934314322812custom 544512809441325970411custom 52557235714177194792custom 54453390202571695851

15 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC196 views84 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Моё желание стать лучшей версией себя делает меня беднее.🤩 А всё началось с простого разбора гардероба в поисках своего стиля и продолжилось тем что я обновляю свой уход в погоне за идеальной кожей…

custom 544533902025716958529❤‍🔥27custom 545174480506535148819custom 52557235714177194794custom 544512809441325970432

12 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC231 views82 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Стоит больше внимания уделять деталям.🤩📃🧴 Уютный вечер With my D.🪬🤎

❤‍🔥31custom 543378574720947490124custom 520861335934314322820custom 545174480506535148852

7 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC225 views79 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

Тренды проходят, но мы не смогли пройти мимо них.✉️🌼

custom 544512809441325970427custom 545174480506535148820custom 5208613359343143228196❤‍🔥6custom 54337857472094749011

6 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC181 views67 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Me in my muse era. В этом мире и так много сложностей ,поэтому я пожалуй продолжу любить,вдохновлять и удивлять.

custom 543378574720947490119custom 54451280944132597041816❤‍🔥7custom 52086133593431432284custom 54517448050653514882custom 52557235714177194791

5 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC142 views58 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

☀️🤩🏺

❤‍🔥26custom 54517448050653514881710custom 54337857472094749013custom 52086133593431432282

4 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC173 views54 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Without filters 🐟 Just rest, the remnants of summer аnd beautiful views.🪭🫥🌟

custom 543378574720947490121❤‍🔥18custom 545174480506535148812custom 52086133593431432283

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @ninixys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NI.IVINA” (@ninixys), 153 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ninixys.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.