Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for no luck, just effort 🏠

Channel

no luck, just effort 🏠

@nljeko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

236subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002422817332
TypeChannel
Username@nljeko
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nljeko

Growth

2142362258 August 2026 — 214 subscribers8 August 2026 — 214 subscribers16 August 2026 — 216 subscribers24 August 2026 — 217 subscribers1 September 2026 — 227 subscribers11 September 2026 — 232 subscribers18 September 2026 — 236 subscribers8 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 211–239 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:18236+4
11 Sept 2026, 01:00232+5
1 Sept 2026, 05:23227+10
24 Aug 2026, 07:48217+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:05216+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:49214no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:30214first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5291.2%
😢35.26%
👍11.75%
😱11.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC61 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gpmls

The MOST ANNOYING comment on Singaporean social media: “65% of y'all voted for this.” Cost of living too high? 65% of y'all voted for this. Singapore getting too crowded? 65% of y'all voted for this. Government cutting down forests for BTO? 65% of y'all voted for this. WHATEVER issues arise with Singaporean politics, some people are so quick to jump on their moral high ground and mock the majority for “reaping wha

5

5 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC82 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @carbonated_carabao

can even potentially mention in AQ since SG has Changi

5 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC80 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @carbonated_carabao

can't look at contrails the same anyways, here's a climate change mitigation strategy example for the aviation industry that you can yap about in #gp

1 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC117 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Talking about heritage and preservation of history, the government just fully acquired the former home of late PM Lee Kuan Yew at 38 Oxley Road https://cna.asia/4biNKoT Do what you will with this information 😮

😢3

31 Jul 2026, 23:52 UTC116 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Let's modify the original question to: Why does it feel wrong when someone, whose ancestors attempted to erase our identity, tries to explain to us what our identity is or should be? Historical oppression has led to the loss of significant heritage, much of which we will never get back. It rarely feels nice when someone tries to tell us who we are when they have not lived our experiences, and it feels even worse whe

5

31 Jul 2026, 23:51 UTC95 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Back to the original question 😮 Historically, White colonisers have attempted to oppress and erase Asian history, identity, and existence. (Sadly, it is not just Asians who have suffered at the hands of the White colonisers.) Many of these colonisers have yet to provide sufficient proper acknowledgement that they did so, let alone provide repatriations. There's also the big issue of the historical, culturally-signifi

2

31 Jul 2026, 23:51 UTC92 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Why does it feel wrong when White people try to explain Asian history to us? 🥲 Stripping away the ethnic umbrella terms ("White" and "Asian" btw) in the original question, the question becomes why it feels wrong when someone who does not belong to a culture, attempts to explain the culture to someone who has lived within the culture. One could posit that it arises from an instinct to protect our heritage and ancest

5

31 Jul 2026, 04:36 UTC89 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @carbonated_carabao

Global minimum corporate tax rate | Wikipedia could use this for any points or qns related to globalisation, taxes, wealthy vs poorer nations, and multi-national businesses #gp

2

30 Jul 2026, 05:09 UTC254 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The modern consumer: some readings for you today! The danger of being in the middle: https://open.substack.com/pub/eugenehealey/p/the-death-of-the-middle?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1vk3ff China's brand politics: https://cna.asia/4h21vfq [My own post here!: https://t.me/nljeko/488] Our addiction to consumerism: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/nov/28/too-much-stuff-can-we-solve-our-addiction-

3

29 Jul 2026, 07:45 UTC116 viewsread 8 August 2026

Bahrain Grand Prix but it's in Malaysia 😮 apt time to consider why the name of the Grand Prix is not Malaysia/Sepang Grand Prix https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/malaysia-f1-race-tickets-sepang-formula-one-6285036 Also good to consider how hosting international sporting events provides a service to the country in increasing foreign investments and tourism, but a disservice to the local communities who experience

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nljeko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“no luck, just effort 🏠” (@nljeko), 236 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nljeko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.