Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ``nnevblep

Channel

``nnevblep

@nnevb1ep

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

455subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002485473365
TypeChannel
Username@nnevb1ep
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nnevb1ep

Growth

45446245810 August 2026 — 462 subscribers10 August 2026 — 462 subscribers18 August 2026 — 457 subscribers26 August 2026 — 454 subscribers2 September 2026 — 455 subscribers45510 August 20262 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 453–463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 00:05455+1
26 Aug 2026, 06:56454-3
18 Aug 2026, 23:17457-5
10 Aug 2026, 14:15462no change
10 Aug 2026, 14:02462first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

211 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓5626.5%
5124.2%
❤‍🔥3315.6%
custom 5292212359434111638209.48%
💘136.16%
custom 5264721394758877544125.69%
custom 5265125319253197909125.69%
💋115.21%
custom 528988565109581609131.42%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC137 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @gggezzzzz999Photo

Marina & The Diamonds – Teen Idle 👾 👾The wasted years The wasted youth The pretty lies The ugly truth And the day has come where I have died Only to find, I've come alive👾

8❤‍🔥5🍓4

31 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC174 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026

эрен йегер и сплит языка🤔😏

💘13💋8custom 52647213947588775446🍓2

30 Jul 2026, 03:01 UTC182 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @polenodadaPhoto

по-моему времени уже 12 ночи, а значит, наступил мой день рождения!! сегодня мне исполняется целых…. 🐈🐈 лет вау теперь по меркам гравити фолз я подросток я не умею красиво говорить, но просто хочу выразить вам всем огромную, сердечную благодарность за то, что вы, во-первых, со мной остаетесь, а во-вторых, что прям перед днем рождения вы подарили мне очень красивое число папищеков! огромное всем спасибо за приятные

custom 526512531925319790910🍓53❤‍🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC238 views38 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟 я наконец-то могу поделиться с вами своей работой на самый масштабный ивент, в котором я участвовала. вот такая тёмная феечка вышла. невероятно горжусь данной работой. получила огромное удовольствие от процесса создания этой красотули. было весело и интересно наблюдать за чужими работами. очень рада, что мои подружки тоже поучаствовали в ивенте. #nnevblep_da

17❤‍🔥9🍓9💋2custom 52651253192531979091

27 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC175 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @palm06_artPhoto

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Первая подборка феечек🤩 🤩Я не продаю персонажей, права на них полностью во владении самих авторов! 🦋А в т о р ы🦋 🤩1) @ZANZARAAAA; https://t.me/hudowniki ➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩2) https://t.me/polenodada; @POLKAPOLENOO ➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩3) @m1dzukaa; @m1zuklmn ➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩4) @LOL_if_lyt; https://t.me/hahasiki ➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩5) @nnevblep; https://t.me/nnevb1ep ➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩6) @smuusq; https://t.me/nelegalka666 ➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩7) @Hiktkkk; https://t.me/Etr

5❤‍🔥3🍓3

25 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC257 views62 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

бога нет дома #nnevblep_wip

🍓32❤‍🔥1511💋1custom 52651253192531979091custom 52898856510958160911custom 52922123594341116381

21 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC369 views35 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @foxandcherryPhoto

у меня сегодня день рождения. хочу сказать вам большое спасибо, что смотрите, наблюдаете и следите за моим творчеством. спасибо, что вы есть. искренне рада каждому человечку здесь. если бы не ваша поддержка - не знаю, где бы я была сейчас. обняла, подняла каждого 🤍

custom 5292212359434111638197custom 52647213947588775446custom 52898856510958160912🍓1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nnevb1ep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“``nnevblep” (@nnevb1ep), 455 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nnevb1ep.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.