Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 91 days, net +4,288. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,246–13,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 07:10
7,992
-2
1 Nov 2026, 22:08
7,994
-33
30 Oct 2026, 01:21
8,027
-49
26 Oct 2026, 15:06
8,076
-66
23 Oct 2026, 16:55
8,142
-123
20 Oct 2026, 23:17
8,265
-127
17 Oct 2026, 15:30
8,392
-80
14 Oct 2026, 08:59
8,472
-231
11 Oct 2026, 00:17
8,703
-190
4 Oct 2026, 21:16
8,893
-864
25 Sept 2026, 00:37
9,757
-581
18 Sept 2026, 19:02
10,338
-282
16 Sept 2026, 13:18
10,620
-258
14 Sept 2026, 19:15
10,878
-204
13 Sept 2026, 03:00
11,082
-1,108
11 Sept 2026, 01:56
12,190
+8,647
6 Sept 2026, 08:18
3,543
-1,169
1 Sept 2026, 21:55
4,712
-159
30 Aug 2026, 08:13
4,871
-71
27 Aug 2026, 15:53
4,942
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 7,992 subscribers
Avg views / post
842
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
31 (17 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
11,793
Reactions total
817
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 11:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,030
Videos
≈57
Links
≈69
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
36s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,823 reactions across 31 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
811
44.5%
🔥
480
26.3%
💘
298
16.3%
😍
68
3.73%
🍓
63
3.46%
😁
40
2.19%
custom 5400200571833556442
18
0.987%
💅
15
0.823%
🍾
14
0.768%
custom 5328234117001675010
9
0.494%
🤯
7
0.384%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,823 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 31 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nobeautes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Кремы для рук на зиму
🤩 без отдушек
В этом сегменте в фаворитах у меня Липобейз, у него несколько вариаций (все хорошие), обзоры есть на канале. По цене, правда, мудрят в разных точках.
На что важно обратить внимание при выборе:
• мочевина, глицерин и пантенол в составе для хорошего увлажнения
• можно масла для дополнительного питания, особенно если трескается кожа. Но учтите, что будет сильно жирнее и тяжелее (ж…
РОЗЫГРЫШ СЕРТИФИКАТА ЗЯ 🤎
Пришла пора поднять вам настроение!
🎁 Сертификат на 2.000 рублей в Золотое Яблоко получит одна из вас уже через девять дней!
Условия:
✔️ подписка на мой канал
✔️ реакция на этот и последние 5 постов
✔️ нажать на кнопку в боте внизу поста
Результаты будут подведены автоматически, 13 ноября в 20:00.
*автор канала оставляет за собой право переизбрать победителя вручную, если выигравший ак…
Одной горошины этого крема хватит, чтобы пожарить стопку блинов 🤩
Купила его для интенсивного напитывания кожи в засушливые периоды. Благо на него была хорошая скидка и подарок, ибо я жутко разочарована в нем.
Состав супер бедный, по стандартной стоимости в ~1500₽ это грабеж на ровном месте.
Что этот крем по факту из себя представляет?
• отдушка перебивает даже мой La Sultan de Saba! Будто кто-то ограбил нескольк…
Существует ли универсальная идеальная заколка для волос?
увы, универсальной нет, но вы можете для себя определить тот самый эталон, проанализировав волосы и рутину
Если вы заботитесь о волосах, критически важно обратить внимание не только на материал аксессуаров, но и на эти вещи:
• масса ваших волос. На редких и тонких волосах массивный крабик будет сильно тянуть волосы.
• частота смены причесок. Наверняка слыша…
прервалась на обед и снова за дело
Кто узнал персонажа, тот большой молодец! Мне всегда было страшно увидеть себя со светлыми бровями, благодаря консилеру теперь вижу, что очень даже неплохо выглядит. Елену Гилберт или Кэтрин Пирс было бы повторять слишком легко, но как-нибудь обязательно сделаем.
С Хэллоуином 🎃
Приспичило сегодня сообразить что-то к утреннему кофе 🤩
Получилось прикольно, вот только я совсем забыла добавить сахар в тесто
(и шоколад ситуацию не спас).
Зато кофейный ритуал не был сорван, и я осталась сыта на весь день. Решительно настроена на следующую попытку уже без забытого сахара)))
Ловите рецепт!
#готовим
Случалось ли у вашей кожи раздвоение личности?
у меня сухая кожа, я уже привыкла к тому, что она сама себя вообще не обслуживает в плане себума, но недавно несколько дней подряд я замечала жирность в области носа. Для меня это буквально нонсенс: мой нос годами не проявлял подобной инициативы, а тут решил, что пора.
Тип кожи - не гарантия, что она будет вести себя одинаково при любых обстоятельствах, потому что на с…
Со скепсисом отношусь к бьюти-линейкам от брендов одежды, и вот попробовала Love Republic 🤩
Парфюмированный лосьон-суфле для тела, стандартная стоимость - 1990₽
Меня очень порадовала текстура, это реально суфле, очень воздушно и нежно ощущается на коже, тут не обманули.
Про этот продукт важно понимать, что это не прям уход ради ухода, скорее аромат + комфорт. Несмотря на неплохой состав, основная фишка - отдушки. …
Я впервые заказала косметику в Рив Гоше вместо ЗЯ и этим случайно подписалась на бьюти-бокс с сюрпризами
там другой интерфейс, другой ассортимент, привычных продуктов почти нет, огромное поле для экспериментов
Первое разочарование уже настигло, и я сама в нем виновата!
Открыла посылку, смотрю на неё и думаю: мицеллярная вода для хомячков 😢
Она, конечно, очень миленькая, компактная, наверное, у неё даже есть мечта о…
Попробовала новую маску от Tashe, и она мне понравилась больше, чем их прошлая маска-филлер 🤩
А всё почему? Потому что мои тонкие волосы после неё не стали тяжелыми, нет ощущения, что помыла голову, но будто уже пора опять.
Волосы сохранили свою воздушность, стали заметно мягче. И немаловажно - поддаются укладке (прошлая маска такого мне не смогла позволить). Отдушка тоже лучше, прям наслаждаюсь теми часами, в кото…
Меня свалила болезнь на несколько дней, потихоньку возвращаюсь к вам 🤩
Вы замечали, как на вашу кожу влияют вирусы?
Мне в этот раз прям досталось, барьер кожи на лице заметно сдал позиции, краснею так, будто к доске вызвали. Плюс обострение экземы на руках, редкое, но очень неприятное событие.
• классика жанра - потеря влаги кожей, если у вас температура. Знаю, что в такие моменты не до ухода, но полезно рядышком …
Масла для волос: улыбаемся и мажем
сделала подборку не по принципу «на этикетке авокадо - значит надо», реально отобрала лучшие
Сегодня в подборку включены категории масел для защиты, снижения воздействия внешних факторов и уменьшения ломкости. К таким прежде всего относятся:
🤩 кокосовое, аргановое, жожоба, подсолнечное, авокадо и минеральное масла
*масла могут закрывать сразу несколько функций
Важный момент:
до…
❤17🔥15💅3💘3
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @nobeautes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@nobeautes edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
5 November 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бьюти и не очень” (@nobeautes), 7,992 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nobeautes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.