Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Noel le Pen

Channel

Noel le Pen

@noellepen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,831subscribers

+70 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001340797293
TypeChannel
Username@noellepen
Created2 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/noellepen

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,7484,8314,789.56 August 2026 — 4,761 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,761 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,759 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,755 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,749 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,748 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,760 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,770 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,780 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,775 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,782 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4,791 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,798 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,806 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,831 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,736–4,843 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:214,831+25
13 Sept 2026, 07:174,806+8
9 Sept 2026, 04:374,798+7
4 Sept 2026, 01:594,791+9
31 Aug 2026, 19:484,782+7
28 Aug 2026, 22:434,775-5
25 Aug 2026, 18:094,780+10
23 Aug 2026, 03:534,770+10
20 Aug 2026, 02:264,760+12
16 Aug 2026, 21:054,748-1
13 Aug 2026, 05:184,749-6
10 Aug 2026, 15:074,755-4
7 Aug 2026, 09:434,759-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:344,761no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:594,761first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3,461 reactions across 18 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
59417.2%
😁54015.6%
🥰47913.8%
🤣3299.51%
💯3139.04%
😭2707.80%
👍1634.71%
😍1394.02%
🔥1353.90%
🫡1203.47%
🤮591.70%
🍌561.62%
😎491.42%
👀361.04%
🌭240.693%
🤝220.636%
👏140.405%
😇130.376%
😢110.318%
🤔90.26%
20 further kinds862.48%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,461 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,100 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥50🥰26👀13🤮8😁6🌭5😍5🍌4

2 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC≈2,670 views224 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Every tourist in France 2026

💯138😭57😁21👍61🍌1

28 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC≈3,310 views190 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Don't worry, friends. I am not near the giant forest fires currently ravaging France. I hope the stupid people who make fires in wooded areas during the drough are caught in the fires. Pray for people in danger and the French firefighters, friends.

144🔥16🤝14🤪9😁2🍌1👎1🤮1

26 Jul 2026, 08:22 UTC≈3,490 views234 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Mister zippertits at the beach

🤣161🤮24😭18🌭16🥰4😁3😘3🗿2

24 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC≈3,480 views210 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Twitter Noël is now protected by the patriot Sleepy who will post my drawings there. I'll stay here myself in Telegram unless Durov sells me to the french oligarchy. You'll still find my blue and pink hair incredible opinions here

118🫡55👍15😍10🌭3🔥2🤣2😭2

21 Jul 2026, 21:22 UTC≈3,230 views197 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Little update from vacation Noël. The french jews oligarchy just decided that i'll have to provide my identity to twitter. Fuck this. So, either i find a way to vpn , or this account will vanish ( or maybe telegram will resist). Don't worry, i'll still find ways to make my shitty memes being shared 🥰

97😭61🫡18🥰11😢6🍌1🏆1👏1

20 Jul 2026, 15:39 UTC≈3,020 views133 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Fan art by old dead tom. His twitter : https://x.com/oldedeadtom/status/2079224171024785856?s=20

😁100🥰1610🤡3🤯3🍌1

16 Jul 2026, 05:36 UTC≈3,610 views159 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

I'm going on vacations for a little more than a month 🌊⛱️👒. Have a nice white suppremacy summer , guys. Normally, i won't draw during that time ( but every year , i always find a moment to , so, who knows ). I'll repost some old drawings sometimes. Love you, XOXO 🥰

🥰95🫡33😁144🤣4🤝3💋2😘2

13 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈5,150 views208 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰134🔥19🫡14💯10🤣9👍6😁6💘5

10 Jul 2026, 06:18 UTC≈5,340 views207 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

You Can explain a lot of behaviours by simply thinking "jealousy"

💯121😭46😁14👀85🍌4👏2🤣2

7 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC≈5,970 views194 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Cuckstar

😁110🤣56🍌9🤮6🤓3🤔32🗿2

6 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC≈4,430 views241 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The female artist

😍12436😁35👀15🥰9🍓5🦄5🤮4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @noellepen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

/g/'s Tech Memes
@gentoomemes · 28,148
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Noel le Pen” (@noellepen), 4,831 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noellepen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.