Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for no nuance october

Channel

no nuance october

@nonuanceautumn

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,001subscribers

+438 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003876125820
TypeChannel
Usernames@nonuanceautumn @nonuancesummer
Descriptionнеанонка @neanon228bot анонка @anonkann228bot для мемасов и общения с админами @anoncoo228bot
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held10
On Telegramt.me/nonuanceautumn

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,0011,0019 August 2026 — 1,563 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,569 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,581 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,707 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,741 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2 subscribers3 October 2026 — 3 subscribers6 October 2026 — 2,001 subscribers6 October 2026 — 2,001 subscribers9 August 20266 October 2026
10 measurements spanning 58 days, net +438. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 15:222,001no change
6 Oct 2026, 14:472,001+1,998
3 Oct 2026, 21:373+1
31 Aug 2026, 00:352+1
24 Aug 2026, 07:151-1,740
20 Aug 2026, 13:221,741+34
17 Aug 2026, 11:451,707+126
13 Aug 2026, 15:471,581+12
10 Aug 2026, 09:331,569+6
9 Aug 2026, 13:321,563first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 2,001 subscribers
Avg views / post
336
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held37 (9 August 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total5,710
Reactions total410
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,380
Videos
≈147
Links
≈475

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,163 reactions across 37 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 519511498580139894957949.8%
custom 531682437746604392213511.6%
custom 521551343046258133312510.7%
❤968.25%
🔥413.53%
👻342.92%
🍓242.06%
😭242.06%
😱201.72%
custom 5451769303558807523181.55%
🍌110.946%
🤣110.946%
🥰110.946%
🦄80.688%
💘60.516%
👍50.43%
🤡40.344%
🤔30.258%
💔20.172%
💩20.172%
4 further kinds40.344%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Oct 2026, 14:39 UTC133 views27 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

это вообще блять не смешно, пиздец, с таким чехлом в люди нельзя появляться, это позорно

custom 519511498580139894922custom 53168243774660439224❤1

Signed лизя невротик и невпопик🇨🇾

6 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC55 views16 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

🤩Добро пожаловать в дискорд сервер ннкф🤩 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 Дискорд сервер ннкф это место где вы можете поговорить с ннкфщикам по душам, это место где вы можете услышать звонкие голоса и умилительный смех ннкфят по звонку, вы можете даже открыть ветку для обсуждения в разделе "тейки" если обычного ннкф вам не хватило 🌟🌟🌟😳☺️💖💖💖 Ссылка на сервер:https://discord.gg/M7CNGWe8u 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 Если ссылка не работает то писать @BanderaReje

❤11custom 53168243774660439224custom 54517693035588075231

Signed РЕЙЧЯН

6 Oct 2026, 12:50 UTC223 views10 reactionsread 6 October 2026

Первое поколение покемонов слишком сильно переоценено Да, это классика, с этого поколения началась франшиза, но давайте признаем что оно довольно скучное с точки зрения сюжетки и самих покекемонов

❤6custom 51951149858013989494

Signed шизанутая плесеньლ(= з = )ლ ~

6 Oct 2026, 12:48 UTC229 views10 reactionsread 6 October 2026

Люди, которые придают слишком большое значение фандомам и фандомному дискурсу, одни из самых неприятных людей для общения

custom 51951149858013989496🔥3custom 52155134304625813331

Signed лизя невротик и невпопик🇨🇾

6 Oct 2026, 12:41 UTC248 views10 reactionsread 6 October 2026

две тёщи.пипищиков.ура

🥰8💘1🔥1

Signed шизанутая плесеньლ(= з = )ლ ~

6 Oct 2026, 11:46 UTC287 views9 reactionsread 6 October 2026

Naughty kitties самая лучшая старая игра которая могла быть в чьём то детстве. Незаслуженно забытая

🔥7🍌2

Signed лизя невротик и невпопик🇨🇾

6 Oct 2026, 11:23 UTC313 views32 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

говна там не оказалось

😭24🔥3🍓2💔2❤1

Signed ♯ྀི ⋮ ʝ𝚊𝚗𝚚ɱ𝚘𝚝𝚑 ꒱. ݁𖦹

6 Oct 2026, 10:36 UTC338 views15 reactionsread 6 October 2026

Меня бесит, что в хелп кф ( @helpadapterhelp ) добавили ии бота в комменты. Наверное, если бы люди хотели обратиться к ии, они бы пошли к ии, а не в кф к людям????

❤12🔥2💘1

Signed лизя невротик и невпопик🇨🇾

6 Oct 2026, 09:52 UTC374 views18 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 545176930355880752311🍓4❤1🔥1🦄1

Signed РЕЙЧЯН

6 Oct 2026, 09:07 UTC390 views37 reactionsread 6 October 2026

люди которые пишут под липсинки с «ви фел ин лав ин октобер» хуйню по типу «наша влвшка» долбоебы ебанные

custom 519511498580139894923🔥9custom 53168243774660439225

Signed РЕЙЧЯН

6 Oct 2026, 08:01 UTC433 views14 reactionsread 6 October 2026

в комьюнити персоны 5 роял дохуища ларпов , я сомневаюсь что большая часть хотябы прикасалась к игре, большинство либо смотрело анимешку либо ваще ниче не делали

custom 519511498580139894914

Signed РЕЙЧЯН

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @nonuanceautumn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“no nuance october” (@nonuanceautumn), 2,001 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nonuanceautumn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.