Posted without readable text

Channel
Nordwhale Capital
@nordwhale
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,092subscribers
-74 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002134112509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nordwhale |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nordwhale |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 2,092 | -9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 2,101 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 2,105 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 2,114 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 2,123 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 2,128 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 2,126 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 2,132 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 2,141 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 2,147 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 2,153 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 2,158 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 2,165 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 2,166 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 90.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Here is the formula for calculating it simply by yourself. @Nordwhale
BTC–Gold Correlation Update Our latest analysis shows that the short-term correlation between Bitcoin and Gold has strengthened over the past week. Current 60m correlation during 1 week: +64 If you have higher conviction on one market, you can use that view to cross-check potential setups on the other. It shouldn’t replace your analysis—but it can add an extra layer of confirmation while this relationship remains…
Our trading department @Skatfx is doing pretty well with interday & day tradings ⚡️
Skatfx trading performance in June 2026. Monthly net profit: +4% Skatfx Club
❤1🔥1
Before every major geopolitical event, there is a moment when the market starts whispering. Not screaming. Whispering. Oil climbs. The dollar strengthens. Volatility quietly returns. Capital begins looking for shelter. To most people, these are just charts. To those who pay attention… they’re conversations. Meanwhile, political rhetoric is becoming more aggressive. Military movements are becoming more freque…
What's happening between US100 & Gold? It seems like gold is acting less like a safe haven and more like a risk asset. The 30-day correlation between XAUUSD and US100 has climbed to +0.73, suggesting both markets are currently trading on the same macro narrative. That’s not a coincidence. When liquidity and rate expectations dominate, traditional relationships begin to blur. Keep an eye on this correlation. Whe…
The Opportunity No One’s Actually Talking About. We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again: If you’re an investor, don’t overlook gold at these levels. While much of the market’s attention is focused on equities, the AI hype, and the headlines of the day, gold has been quietly creating one of the most attractive long-term opportunities in the market. It may not be making new highs every week like the S&P 500 o…
❤4
Don’t take these reports as just another market post :)) These are the same analysis we use before putting our own capital at risk. We spend days researching macro trends, positioning, and market drivers and we share it with you for free. And by the way, we are not selling you anything. Unless we receive DM requests for it.
⚡️Oil analysis update We mentioned three scenarios in our Q4 2026 oil outlook which was based on fundamentals, with one serving as our base case. So far, price action has been tracking that base case closely. For now, nothing has changed in our view. We still expect oil to trade within the $75–$95 range until we see a meaningful shift in the underlying fundamentals. @Nordwhale x @Skatfx
❤2
China may be buying much more gold than official data suggests. The People’s Bank of China officially added 15 tonnes of gold in June, its largest monthly purchase in over two years and its 20th straight month of increasing reserves. But here’s the interesting part: Goldman Sachs estimates China also bought large amounts of gold through London’s OTC market, purchases that may not immediately appear in official res…
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nordwhale. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@therealjeafx · 28,678
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
@shaakunitrap · 69,365
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
@icttraininginstitute_1 · 22,148
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
@photontrading · 33,569
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
@smctreadresdtsgtgtrg · 26,381
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
@planfomo · 24,610
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
@Liquidity_Trading · 48,517
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nordwhale Capital” (@nordwhale), 2,092 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nordwhale.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.