Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +657. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,924–11,875 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:19
11,765
+79
15 Sept 2026, 16:59
11,686
+162
14 Sept 2026, 02:22
11,524
-9
12 Sept 2026, 06:16
11,533
-27
10 Sept 2026, 01:58
11,560
-17
6 Sept 2026, 22:16
11,577
-22
4 Sept 2026, 11:02
11,599
-3
3 Sept 2026, 01:36
11,602
-5
1 Sept 2026, 21:27
11,607
-9
31 Aug 2026, 20:24
11,616
-8
30 Aug 2026, 16:48
11,624
-7
29 Aug 2026, 17:14
11,631
+1
28 Aug 2026, 19:02
11,630
-5
27 Aug 2026, 22:25
11,635
-3
26 Aug 2026, 21:55
11,638
-3
25 Aug 2026, 19:24
11,641
-3
24 Aug 2026, 19:36
11,644
+47
23 Aug 2026, 07:46
11,597
+563
21 Aug 2026, 16:12
11,034
-1
20 Aug 2026, 16:36
11,035
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.14%
avg views ÷ 11,765 subscribers
Avg views / post
605
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
44 (3 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
7,254
Reactions total
178
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 30s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,007 reactions across 42 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
407
40.4%
❤
284
28.2%
😁
92
9.14%
🔥
65
6.45%
🥰
63
6.26%
🤣
26
2.58%
💯
21
2.09%
👌
18
1.79%
❤🔥
16
1.59%
👏
9
0.894%
👀
6
0.596%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,007 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Помните, когда только начинался процесс масштабной цифровизации гражданского оборота, много говорили о «псевдозащищённой цифровой среде»?
Мол, граждане верят всему, что видят в цифровом формате, потому что это технологично и современно. Конечно, у такого положения были свои следствия.
Нотариальные документы в электронном виде стали получать новые степени защиты, создавались специальные каналы связи и базы данных, а…
Мои давние читатели наверняка обратили внимание, что в записках у меня есть, так сказать, сквозные темы.
И вот, кажется, появилась ещё одна – заключение сделок с гражданами, признанными банкротами. А вернее – незаключение таких сделок.
Ведь добросовестный покупатель может легко попасть в ловушку чужого банкротства, остаться и без денег, и без покупки, если отнесётся к проверке своего контрагента слишком беспечно.
…
Я вот часто пишу тут о гарантиях, которые даёт нотариальная форма совершения сделок.
Однако речь идёт не только о чисто правовой гарантии, обеспеченной профессиональными навыками нотариуса и высоким уровнем квалификации, но и о материальной гарантии.
Увы, нотариус, как и всякий человек, может ошибиться. И даже может стать жертвой мошеннической схемы.
Что ни говори, а ловкачи, способные обвести вокруг пальца опытно…
Нотариус мой участвовал в семинаре, посвящённом оценке психического состояния людей, совершающих сделки под влиянием телефонных аферистов.
А главным докладчиком выступила руководитель отдела судебно-психиатрической экспертизы Национального медицинского исследовательского центра психиатрии имени Сербского, т. е. человек, который знает о человеческой психике достаточно много.
Так вот, если вы думали, что типичная жер…
Сегодня к нотариусу моему коллега в гости приезжал. Поделился историей.
К нему обратился гражданин в такой ситуации: у него доля в доме 8/9, у второго собственника — 1/9, но этот второй собственник умер больше 15 лет назад, наследники не объявились, контакты потеряны, а по выписке из ЕГРН доля всё ещё зарегистрирована на покойного.
И как-то ведь надо эту ситуацию разрешить, чтобы эта 1/9 не висела мёртвым грузом, ф…
Посетитель наш сосредоточенно генерировал какие-то картинки в нейросети. Потом выяснилось, что он дизайнер.
Работа у него такая — создавать визуальный контент. И пришёл он к нам в контору как раз по вопросу защиты прав интеллектуальной собственности.
Вопрос, должен сказать, отнюдь не тривиальный. Особенно когда речь заходит об использовании ИИ.
В российском законодательстве постепенно складывается особое отношение…
Сегодня к нам заходили граждане, открывали наследственное дело.
Завещания покойный не оставил, так что нотариус мой объяснял посетителям, как распределяются доли. И в какой-то момент этого разъяснения одна из наследниц воскликнула:
— А Тобик?!
— Не понял вас, уважаемая, — нотариус мой к ней обратился.
— Тобик — собачка, корги. С ним что будет?
И вот действительно, дорогие мои, тема передачи домашних животных по на…
Сегодня пришёл гражданин и говорит:
— Мне нужно доверенность оформить.
— Какую именно, уважаемый? — нотариус мой уточняет.
— А вот, у меня с собой...
И достаёт из сумки берестяной свиток!
Протягивает нотариусу:
— Прошу поставить печать и подпись, словом, удостоверить.
Нотариус мой даже немного растерялся. Ведь действительно не поймёшь, всерьёз человек говорит или шутит. А может, это от коллег такая пасхалочка?
Но…
🐾 Коты знают: лето создано для того, чтобы им наслаждаться☀️
Греться на солнышке, валяться на траве, смотреть на мир и никуда не спешить… А между тем до осени осталась всего неделя! 😿
❤🔥16😁9❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @notar_kot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дневник кота нотариуса” (@notar_kot), 11,765 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notar_kot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.