Channel
@notcunt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,283subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002177764149 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @notcunt |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notcunt |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 1,283 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 1,291 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 1,292 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 1,295 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 1,302 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 1,305 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 1,308 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 1,309 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 1,307 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 1,308 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 1,307 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 1,303 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 1,302 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 1,302 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
В комьюнити Вайкоффа как-то давно придумали Тайп3 формацию, чего официально нигде небыло, формируется он после остановки цены одним свингом, и билдинг ликвы внутри не перебивая свинг остановки. (у тайп2, 2 остановки перед аккумом/дистром). По евро формация в хорошем месте для общего контекста, под лоями годового боковика, не ожидал такого мува сильного пиздец палка.
Последний день.
Третий набор в этом году. Сохранили доступную цену. Вы получаете: - Готовую систему. - Лайв бектесты системы на истории. - Работа с чартом в реальном времени. - Три рабочих стрима в неделю. - Домашнее задание — индивидуально. - Комьюнити опытных трейдеров. - 95% вероятность того, что это станет вашей последней остановкой. Легче и понятнее вы вряд ли встречали материал. Пишите @notstaff666, пару дней на подумать …
Суть трейдинга - исполнение закономерностей. A. Понимание базовой механики достаточно для построения сетапа. (Реакция цены на уровни проторговки или снятие ликвидности - одни из бесспорных фундаментальных паттернов на рынке.) B. Определение двух ключевых точек вашего паттерна: a. Зона high-probability: участок графика с максимальной вероятностью отработки идеи. b. Зона low-probability: участок с наименьшим потенциа…
https://ru.tradingview.com/script/4ZJLFVjr-%D0%9D%D0%B8%D1%85%D1%83%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B5-%D0%A3%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B8/ Кто торгует на более интрадей таймфреймах, аишка намутила реально годный ADR индюк. Период выбирайте под себя сами.
6 поз за месяц из которых 3 бу.
Чарт такой себе, лучшие сетапы те - что видно сразу без напряга, минимум стресса и полный комфорт, как говорится if you have to force it, its probably shit.
full GM
Франк пощекотал пяточку.
Мало поз, тихо но уверенно.
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @notcunt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“not a cunt” (@notcunt), 1,283 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notcunt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.