гф применила насилие при выборе лучка, поэтому на концерт местных говнарят иду вот так (я НЕ ЗНАЮ, можно ли в таком виде выходить на улицу :с )
💅7❤1

Channel
@nothoughtsonlypossums
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
81subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001643923918 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nothoughtsonlypossums |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nothoughtsonlypossums |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 81 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 82 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 81 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 81 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
230 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 101 | 43.9% | |
| 💅 | 59 | 25.7% | |
| 😍 | 52 | 22.6% | |
| 🦄 | 12 | 5.22% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 1.74% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
гф применила насилие при выборе лучка, поэтому на концерт местных говнарят иду вот так (я НЕ ЗНАЮ, можно ли в таком виде выходить на улицу :с )
💅7❤1
абьюзить будут моё золотце, потому что чьи-то тёмные (фьють-ха!) тайны начали вылезать наружу, прямо в лицо нашему Вентру, и он оказался не рад! пошли в кирху вдвоём, кстати (потому что Ласомброчка ОЧЕНЬ убедительно сказал «не волнуйся», а сияющее Ярило решило, что для того, чтобы не волноваться, надо пойти вместе на рандеву ☺️👹) … ну и, кажется, главным культистом злодеем интриганом окажется самый милый поэт Петербу…
💅3❤2🌚2
Котерия восстанавливает пункт арбуза! Во всех смыслах, потому что Ярик надел свитшот стоун айленд и запланировал абьюз сокотерийца на следующую сессию😄 #водимся #вампидоры
❤5
уже который раз ходим с гф на винные дегустации в абсолютно нефотогеничное место (у меня после этих вечеров НОЛЬ фото), но какие же кайфули, когда вечер проводит толковая барышня-сомелье, а публика подбирается любящая вино, но без бесящего снобизма (этим бесили тусовки в местном винном баре, куда ты приходишь с ощущением, что выглядишь недостаточно дорого и фэнси) сегодня пробовали французскую Луару, нанюхалась скотн…
❤9💅5😍5
Силы Намари нужны не только, чтобы таскать сундуки с золотом (не мимиков!), но и своего собутыльника (почему-то недовольного) 🍻❤️ Чилчак🍺 Намари 🪓 Фотограф 📸 Ретушь 💅 Парики 💇♀️ Костюм Чилчака 🧵/ шарфик Чилчака 🧶 / костюм Намари 🪡 / пояс Намари 🪄
❤14💅10😍8
гф напечатала мне коврик со своим артом с Жонглёром, теперь могу возить розовой мышью по злой бруджиной пасти! 👹❤️❤️
😍12❤5🦄3
наконец-таки могу приложить протухший твиттер-мем "хватит исследовать" к своему фэндому!
💅3🌚2🤣2
✨ Будьте довольны в этот день как Коко (а как кисточник - не будьте 👹) ✨ Ph: Nikonovich
❤16💅9🦄9😍3
говнарёнок выпустил клип на эту песню и так как вот в чём-чём, а в видеографии он ШАРИТ, клип просто жесть как хорош (лайкните пожалусто 😭) https://youtu.be/0JPxb0adrCA?si=pihqaiX9PhOXslED
❤3💅2😍2
гф сделала лучший подарок в понедельник утром 😭❤️❤️❤️😭
❤12
мёртвое дерево, мёртвая цикада и красивые колючки! (хорошо попикничили с шабашем и не только!)
❤12
а ещё у меня будет каноничный ласомбра момент: ПОЙДУ В КИРХУ 💅 (туда позвал импозантный Гангрел в пальто)
💅6❤5😍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @nothoughtsonlypossums. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nothoughtsonlypossums named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“no thoughts head empty” (@nothoughtsonlypossums), 81 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nothoughtsonlypossums.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.