Channel
@novaselectfree
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,356subscribers
-146 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001921023814 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @novaselectfree |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/novaselectfree |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 3,356 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 3,366 | -18 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 3,384 | -19 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 3,403 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:53 | 3,415 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 3,421 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 3,430 | -12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 3,442 | -13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 3,455 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 3,465 | -15 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 3,480 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 3,493 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 3,501 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 3,502 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
17 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 82.4% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 17.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Nova Select Analytics Daily Newsletter - August 7, 2026 ⸻ Nova Select Analytics Free AI Model Leans • Reds/Nationals Over 9 • Athletics/Red Sox Under 8.5 • White Sox +126 (vs. Guardians) • Padres -123 (vs. Astros) • Diamondbacks +1.5 (vs. Dodgers) These are free plays from our AI model which hit at a 55% rate. For all VIP plays from our top experts join here: https://ift.tt/T8dvE0z ⸻ Free Player Prop Leans with …
❤1
Happy Friday! Huge weekend ahead team and we are up early beating line movement for the weekend! Huge week so far and we are looking to continue to push forward thid weekend! Get our 3-Day Weekend Package for only $19.99 which includes all 5 Unit VIP and 10+ Unit EXCLUSIVE plays: https://ift.tt/aE0AMxQ Guaranteed Profit or 1-Week Free ✅
**Nova Select Analytics Daily Newsletter - August 6, 2026** ⸻ **Nova Select Analytics Free AI Model Leans** - Pirates/Brewers Over 7.5 - Blue Jays/Cubs Over 7.5 - Tigers +113 (at Mariners) - Royals -121 (vs. Twins) - Padres -107 (at Diamondbacks) These are free plays from our AI model which hit at a 55% rate. For all VIP plays from our top experts join here: https://ift.tt/T8dvE0z ⸻ **Free Player Prop Leans with…
🔥1
Another massive week for the $1K to $100K Challenge! We’ve got a stacked slate lined up for tonight and plays are dropping soon. Lock in early. Get access to today’s picks here for only $29.99 for all daily VIP plays: https://ift.tt/hMr7YPL
Nova Select Analytics Daily Newsletter - August 5, 2026 ⸻ Nova Select Analytics Free AI Model Leans • Giants +1.5 (at Rangers) • Rays/Rockies Under 11.5 • Nationals +153 (at Phillies) • Pirates/Brewers Over 7 • Padres/Diamondbacks Under 9 These are free plays from our AI model which hit at a 55% rate. For all VIP plays from our top experts join here: https://ift.tt/dG8ijRb ⸻ Free Player Prop Leans with Analysis …
Huge start to the week and we continue to push forward for the $100,000 challenge 🔥 Find all updates on our website which includes our FREE VIP Play Tracker which records all plays updated daily: View it here: https://ift.tt/cDdnm43
Nova Select Analytics Daily Newsletter - August 4, 2026 ⸻ Nova Select Analytics Free AI Model Leans - Pirates/Brewers Over 7.5 - Cubs +174 (vs. Dodgers) - Astros -130 (vs. Blue Jays) - Tigers +121 (at Mariners) - Rays -140 (at Rockies) These are free plays from our AI model which hit at a 55% rate. For all VIP plays from our top experts join here: https://ift.tt/W2FN6P0 ⸻ Free Player Prop Leans with Analysis - …
❤2
THE $1,000 TO $100,000 CHALLENGE IS ROLLING AFTER ANOTHER HUGE WEEK 🔥 👍 JOIN THE 100K CHALLENGE HERE FOR 50% OFF TODAY: https://ift.tt/Qrt4JaV
Nova Select Analytics Daily Newsletter - August 3, 2026 ⸻ Nova Select Analytics Free AI Model Leans - Cubs +1.5 (vs. Dodgers) - Rangers +1.5 (vs. Giants) - Astros -131 (vs. Blue Jays) - Rays/Rockies Under 11.5 These are free plays from our AI model which hit at a 55% rate. For all VIP plays from our top experts join here: https://ift.tt/Nho6XKR ⸻ Free Player Prop Leans with Analysis - Yordan Alvarez Over 1.5 to…
❤1
Huge week ahead after another massive weekend ✅ We are up early already analyzing lines for the week and getting a jump on the top VIP plays today 🔥 Do not miss out on another slate today for only $29.99 join here for VIP access to all 5 unit plays: https://ift.tt/zja6hGT
IT’S GIVEAWAY SUNDAY TEAM! Send in your best bet slips and winning tickets from this week to enter! The winner will be announced later tonight. Don’t forget that our next $1,000 to $100,000 challenge begins soon! We have been dominating this challenge and if you want in make sure to join the waitlist now for FREE: https://ift.tt/SLJb7TK
Nova Select Analytics Daily Newsletter - August 2, 2026 ⸻ Nova Select Analytics Free AI Model Leans - Dodgers ML -165 (vs. Red Sox) - Blue Jays +1.5 (at Cardinals) - Pirates ML +131 (vs. Reds) - Cubs ML +109 (vs. Yankees) These are free plays from our AI model which hit at a 55% rate. For all VIP plays from our top experts join here: https://ift.tt/QS9eN7r ⸻ Free Player Prop Leans with Analysis - Alex Ovechkin …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @novaselectfree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NOVA SELECT FREE PLAYS” (@novaselectfree), 3,356 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/novaselectfree.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.