Channel
@novitoll_ch
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,071subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001307598810 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @novitoll_ch |
| Created | 29 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/novitoll_ch |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 1,071 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 1,069 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 1,070 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 1,069 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 1,068 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 1,069 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 1,070 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 1,072 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 1,071 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 1,068 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 1,068 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
124 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 76 | 61.3% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 20.2% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 14.5% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 2.42% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.806% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.806% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
IBM has recently acquired HRL labs who have made the progress with the silicon qubit based QPU, which requires much less resources to scale. IBM's main qubit implementation is based on the superconducting qubits and HRL's based on quantum dots via silicon qubits. A digitally controlled silicon quantum processing unit https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.16216
❤2
Imagine you're studying quantum information and learning about no-cloning theorem for qubits, and then one day morning, Sabine Hossenfelder posts a video where it's stated that no-cloning theorem needs a refinement 😁 Experimental demonstration that qubits can be cloned at will, if encrypted with a single-use decryption key. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.10695
❤3
Physics160, Lecture notes. Professor: Mikhail Lukin Walkthrough of Quantum Information
❤1
Thanks, everyone! Looking forward for Part 3
🔥6
File, posted without a caption
👍3
🔈 2600 уже в эту пятницу! Готовимся к встрече хакеров и энтузиастов ИБ! (и не только) 🤝 Дата: 5-го июня в Астане (пятница), завтра. Сбор в 18:30. Доклады с 19:00 до 22:00. Локация: Chili Grill. https://2gis.kz/astana/geo/70000001023400274 Дальное помещение внутри, где проектор, что было в прошлый раз. Заходите внутрь с парадного входа, прямо и направо. Справа от барной стойки дальше в проход прямо и увидите помещен…
🔥2
Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.29137
❤3
My presentation's agenda: - First principles. Quantum information vs Classical Shannon's - Landauer's principle - NAND gates for CPUs - Reversible gates - P, NP(C) problems - CHSH game
🔥8🤔1
😵 Объявляем доклады на 2600 в Астане. 5-го июня (пятница) - "Методы обфускации трафика" @merura - "Квантовая информация. Часть 2" @novitoll - "Обработка сигналов и maldev" @abuyerzh Ближе к дате сообщим время и локацию
🔥6❤1
Received books for the Quantum computing self-education. Though the quantum sensing is already ready for the production. UK rail network has been recently improved with the Quantum navigation that does not need any GPS. See the post
🔥9
Going to present about the quantum circuits at the local Astana 2600 meetup.
🤟 Объявляем CFP для следующего 2600 в Астане, 1-го мая. Есть уже два доклада: - Связанный с ИИ 🧠 - Связанный с квантовыми схемами 🔗 Обращаться в ЛС @novitoll
🔥7👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @novitoll_ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“novitoll_ch” (@novitoll_ch), 1,071 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/novitoll_ch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.