Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NRVS

Channel

NRVS

@nrvs777

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

820subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001630592853
TypeChannel
Username@nrvs777
Created23 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nrvs777

Growth

800821810.56 August 2026 — 800 subscribers6 August 2026 — 800 subscribers14 August 2026 — 804 subscribers22 August 2026 — 814 subscribers30 August 2026 — 821 subscribers8 September 2026 — 820 subscribers8206 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 797–824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 02:20820-1
30 Aug 2026, 02:12821+7
22 Aug 2026, 11:27814+10
14 Aug 2026, 18:27804+4
6 Aug 2026, 15:31800no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:06800first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

792 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33141.8%
custom 539791796851444252214718.6%
custom 539790866561527245512916.3%
custom 529863293610964669210813.6%
💯759.47%
👀20.253%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 792 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nrvs777. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 01:07 UTC142 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @by_kirieVideo

🪷🪷🪷Non omnes matres amantes sunt — Не все матери любящие🪷🪷🪷

custom 539790866561527245520custom 539791796851444252211custom 529863293610964669242

31 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC312 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

какая сторона вам больше нравится?

custom 53979179685144425223515custom 53979086656152724552

31 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC311 views71 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

2/3 #мерч

45custom 539791796851444252214custom 529863293610964669211custom 53979086656152724551

31 Jul 2026, 03:23 UTC268 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @pratttrat_art

Posted without readable text

23custom 53979179685144425227custom 53979086656152724555

30 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC253 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ranunculmPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

19custom 539790866561527245514custom 53979179685144425229💯1

28 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC332 views88 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 539790866561527245544💯21custom 529863293610964669212custom 539791796851444252264👀1

27 Jul 2026, 07:07 UTC366 views74 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Спасибо за 800 подписчиков на этом порнопаблике >///<

custom 52986329361096466924213custom 539791796851444252212custom 53979086656152724556👀1

Signed 𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐜𝐡𝐞

25 Jul 2026, 01:58 UTC421 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @antres0liPhoto

#PortfolioDay впервые участвую в чем-то таком, не уверена что результат будет, но попробовать стоит

💯2914custom 539790866561527245511

23 Jul 2026, 17:18 UTC497 views99 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

обратка

60custom 539791796851444252220custom 539790866561527245515custom 52986329361096466924

22 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC557 views96 reactions6 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

1/3 🌟🌟🌟 качество специально такое #мерч

56💯22custom 529863293610964669211custom 53979086656152724555custom 53979179685144425222

21 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTC469 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 5397917968514442522135

21 Jul 2026, 12:25 UTC429 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @dottoscarazinePhoto

🕷️ Шестой вернулся с экспедиции ранним утром. Дотторе, как и всегда, хлопотал в лаборатории, сидя за большим письменным столом. Скарамучча вошёл к нему без стука, как делал это всегда. В его руках был лист бумаги, который Предвестник швырнула Доктору на стол. Пришло время огласить список новобранцев в рядах Второго и Шестого Предвестников 🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Прошедшие художники иллюстраций 🕷️ Росс Кеса Dein Zyanid

4custom 53979179685144425222

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @nrvs777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NRVS” (@nrvs777), 820 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nrvs777.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.