Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 全球热搜大事件🅥

Channel

全球热搜大事件🅥

@nrxxe

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,565subscribers

-1,140 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001787595854
TypeChannel
Username@nrxxe
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nrxxe

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@dashijian19/460657 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC@nrxxe/20358 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC1.00under a minute
@dashijian19/460737 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC@nrxxe/20366 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@dashijian19/460757 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC@nrxxe/20368 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC1.00under a minute
@dashijian19/461097 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC@nrxxe/20402 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@dashijian19/461137 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC@nrxxe/20406 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC1.00under a minute
@nrxxe/20409 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC@dashijian19/461167 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@dashijian1913 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (130)
@chiguayp13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@chiguayp (130)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 13 of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @dashijian19. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

15,56516,70516,1357 August 2026 — 16,705 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,690 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,608 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,544 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,509 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,469 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,440 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,372 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,347 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,256 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,202 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,153 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,128 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,117 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,062 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,002 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,979 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,968 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,960 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,936 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,885 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,859 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,819 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,759 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,726 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,703 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,657 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,565 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 34 days, net -1,140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,394–16,876 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 03:4115,565-92
6 Sept 2026, 19:2215,657-46
4 Sept 2026, 10:3815,703-23
2 Sept 2026, 21:2515,726-33
1 Sept 2026, 22:1815,759-60
1 Sept 2026, 00:5615,819-40
30 Aug 2026, 23:3815,859-26
29 Aug 2026, 22:0915,885-51
28 Aug 2026, 20:4315,936-24
27 Aug 2026, 19:1415,960-8
26 Aug 2026, 16:1715,968-11
25 Aug 2026, 13:5215,979-23
24 Aug 2026, 13:3616,002-60
22 Aug 2026, 18:5716,062-55
21 Aug 2026, 10:3616,117-11
20 Aug 2026, 11:5416,128-25
19 Aug 2026, 09:2516,153-49
18 Aug 2026, 11:0316,202-54
17 Aug 2026, 10:3616,256-91
15 Aug 2026, 20:3716,347first reading

Engagement

540 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.027%
avg views ÷ 15,565 subscribers
Avg views / post
4.2
396 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
414
of 540 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held540 (7 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total1,667
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 47m
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 155 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:52 UTC2 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇻🇳 越南特大跨国贩毒案宣判:11人死刑,20人无期! 据路透社及越南官媒报道,胡志明市人民法院今天对一起特大跨国毒品案宣判,11名被告被判处死刑,至少20人被判无期徒刑。该案共涉及227名被告。 此案源于2023年3月,4名越南航空空姐从巴黎飞抵胡志明市时,被查出随身携带的157管牙膏中藏有超10公斤毒品。调查证实空姐系在不知情下被利用,警方顺藤摸瓜破获了该从法国向越南走私毒品的犯罪网络。 当前: 关注新闻大事件👉 @Tx939 投稿👉 @yoozb

3 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC4 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:今年从柬埔寨来越南,谈了个越南女朋友,长得挺漂亮得,最近感觉她突然变了,因为她没有上班,都是我养着 从上个月开始,就开始去健身,穿一些比较开放的衣服,她以前不是这样的,比较宅,也很少出门 最近经常出门,晚上也经常喝酒,我骑车去接她,看到她和越南男的喝酒,感觉不太正常,但是她说是她同学,都说女人有第六感,我好像也有这种感觉,我是不是快被绿了? PS:要想生活过的去,头上必须带点💚🤣 当前: 关注新闻大事件👉 @Tx939 投稿👉 @yoozb

3 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC6 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨资讯:全域打击网诈成果:冻结逾3亿美元、控制86个园区,近3万嫌疑人落网 在2025年7月至2026年8月31日期间开展的全省/全国性打击行动中,柬埔寨当局冻结了与网络诈骗犯罪挂钩的3亿多美元银行账户资金,并将涉及29个国家和地区、共3927名被告的446起案件移交法院审理。 据打击网络诈骗委员会(CCOS)秘书处透露,当局排查了832处涉嫌地点,突袭了663个窝点,并控制了86个大型诈骗园区,目前正在按法律程序进行没收。 当局表示,目前柬埔寨境内已无大规模运营的诈骗园区,但部分作案活动已转移至更小、更隐蔽的场所,包括出租房、客栈、公寓、民宅、车辆以及咖啡馆等。 此次全国性打击行动还逮捕了来自39个国家和地区的近3万名犯罪嫌疑人;同时,来自38个国家和地区的2.2万多名外籍人员获救并接受遣返程序。 此外,当局还对27家涉嫌网络诈骗的赌场采取了法律行动,吊销了其中18家赌场的执照,并暂停了另外9家的营业资格。

3 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC6 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#最新消息:老挝特内的桐秦水岸D栋目前已经带走一车人了,目测大概有7/8个,在里面的治安局和便衣还没出来,应该还有下一波 当前: 关注新闻大事件👉 @Tx939 投稿👉 @yoozb

3 Sept 2026, 09:07 UTC5 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#群友反馈:今天下午七星海也开始大检查啊 当前: 关注新闻大事件👉 @Tx939 投稿👉 @yoozb

3 Sept 2026, 08:52 UTC6 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:老挝金三角特内桐琴和万国公寓都有警察,据说是来检查办公的, 没有查护照 现在桐琴已经进入D栋检查,治安局和中国成龙一起的,物业老板都过来了,万国公寓已经上楼检查,楼下电梯口还有几个治安局在守着 当前: 关注新闻大事件👉 @Tx939 投稿👉 @yoozb

3 Sept 2026, 08:52 UTC6 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#群友反馈:蓝湾现在进入了很多宪兵队开始检查了 当前: 关注新闻大事件👉 @Tx939 投稿👉 @yoozb

3 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC8 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#群友爆料:我被柬埔寨无良律师坑了2.8万$ 差点命丧监狱 此人是个柬埔寨无良律师,坑蒙拐骗,丧尽天良。律师事务所在海豚警察局附近。 2023年12月底,经本地房东介绍接了我的案子,以帮我保释为名骗取我2.8W美金。我本身只是吸D,因为其拿钱不办事。害我错过黄金时间,最后多花了几倍的代价才得以出来,差点命丧监狱。 本人今年初出狱后联系房东、律师全都置之不理。此人常以警局、监狱、移民局捞人为名,行诈骗之实。本人对被骗之钱已不抱希望,曝光只为揭发其丑恶嘴脸并提醒广大同胞切勿踩雷。 图1:律师,本地房东 当前: 关注新闻大事件👉 @Tx939 投稿👉 @yoozb

3 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC7 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#纯干货海外华人必看被盗U风险规避 你的USDT为什么会被盗?以下这些情况都可能导致资产损失: 🔑 助记词 / 私钥泄露 🎣 钓鱼网站 / 假钱包 📝 恶意授权 / Approve ✍️ 恶意签名 / Permit 🦠 木马 / 病毒 / 剪贴板劫持 📱 手机 / 电脑被控 📲 交易所账号被盗 📞 SIM卡 / 短信劫持 📋 地址投毒 / 地址替换 💻 假交易 / 假TXID 🏦 假投资 / 假平台诈骗 🌉 跨链桥 / DeFi漏洞 🧩 恶意DApp / 假空投 ☁️ 云端备份 / 助记词截图泄露 总结: ⚠️ 安全提醒: ❌ 不泄露助记词 ❌ 不随便授权 ❌ 不点陌生链接 ❌ 不相信所谓“客服” ✅ 转账前仔细核对地址 ✅ 大额资金做好分散与安全备份 🔐 保护好私钥,才是真正的资产安全 当前: 关注新闻大事件👉 @

2 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC6 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🏆 赚赚娱乐 & 金宝娱乐 🍄🍄‍🟫🐚🪸🪨 ✨ 顶级线上娱乐平台联合呈现 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😆🥹😅😂🤣🥲☺️😊 🎮 海量热门游戏 一站畅玩 ⚽ 全球体育赛事 实时开赛 🎰 PG|PP|CQ9|JDB 等热门电子 🎥 真人视讯|🃏棋牌|🎣捕鱼|🎱彩票 💰 高赔率 · 高爆率 ⚡ 极速存提 · 稳定流畅 🔐 安全稳定 · 官方直连 📲 官方机器人 🔶 赚赚娱乐:✈️ @ZZYL 🔷 金宝娱乐:✈️ @JBAO 🎁 新人福利不断 💎 每日频道不定时红包雨 🚀 百万美金秒提款,玩得放心 🔥 两大品牌,一次满足! 💰 玩游戏,就选赚赚娱乐 & 金宝娱乐!

2 Sept 2026, 14:52 UTC2 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:我来说明一下吧。宝威跟天行,高层想要收割,代理已经跑路很多人了。 将心比心,如果公司很好的话,有人会走吗?给公司创造利益,你代理会员输线钱多了,公司就回收。已经不只是第一次这样了,已经是属于忍无可忍。我只是个底层,想跟公司同进退,没想到是这样的鸟公司。入职千万不要去天行跟宝威,兄弟们,不要到时候收割到自己身上。 也跟还在天行跟宝威的兄弟警告一下:今天的我们,就是明天的你们。我本人就是做宝威代理线,被公司收回去的,提成一分钱没看见。今天又看见,离职的兄弟 E 换被冻结了。早就听闻公司的 E 换号,高层可以看见你转账了多少钱出去。 看来公司出的这个易换,也是能操控的。天行跟宝威是活不起了吗?就这样的公司,集团不管管吗?麻烦有在频道的警察,测查一下凯旋 2 楼,直接给这群 B 养的给扫了。草你妈的。 天行的公关也没必要出来解释。你们宝威跟天行做的那些 B 事,哪个体育平台不知道?试问,你部门 1000 万负盈利,公

Showing the 12 most recent of 540 posts we hold for @nrxxe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“全球热搜大事件🅥” (@nrxxe), 15,565 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nrxxe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.