Channel
@nrygrph
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
134subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002592152945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nrygrph |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nrygrph |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 134 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 136 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 134 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 134 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
101 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 39 | 38.6% | |
| ⚡ | 22 | 21.8% | |
| 😍 | 16 | 15.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 13.9% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.94% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 2.97% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.99% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nrygrph. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Короче суть всего выше: страх того, что мои работы не шьются - думаю закрыт. Но, учтите, что лучше работать с фабрикой при моем наличии, а то будет как-то не так и деньги потеряете 🙌🏼 А так работа вышла хорошей, как минимум футболка выглядела лучше тех, которые присутствовали на лане, а это уже какой никакой результат!
👾3
Еще немного общих фото раздобыл 🫂
🔥5
фото кстати тоже раздобыл как смог, поэтому как есть
То самое джерси, которое недавно выходило уже успели пошить, конечно не так как положено, но все таки оно есть. Не учли белый ворот, что конечно всю композу руинит, но в целом главное есть, сроки и так поджимали. p.s. печать шла без моего участия, поэтому как есть + в копилку 🎗️
🔥4😍3
Хочется обсудить тему ИИ-джерси в коммьюнити киберспорта 🤡 С недавних пор активно прет ИИ, используют ее зачастую дизайнеры для улучшения работ, облегчения и так тяжелой рутины, которая лежит на их плечах порой. Ну и естественно, клиенты, дабы сэкономить, либо реально, не понимая того, как действительно шьется джерси, начинают делать не только дизайн в ИИ, но и до футболок добираются. Всем прекрасно видно, что у И…
🔥7⚡5❤🔥3😍1
Brand CHIMERA Esports Совсем недавно мне написали ребята из команды CHIMERA Esports с просьбой сделать им мерч, но впоследствии это переросло в нечто большее, не просто разовый заказ... Если без воды, то Владелец команды - один из тех клиентов, которые встречается очень редко. А всё идёт с истока, какой создатель такая и команда, тут именно так. Мне дали полную волю к данной работе, что я люблю, результат не заста…
⚡8😍4👏1
Channel photo updated
Put a contract out Повседневная тишка для моих ребят из «CHIMERA Esports». Ключевой моделью вышел изумрудный цвет в комбинации с антиквами. В этот раз решил не заморачиваться с технологией пошива, фасон и качество хлопка дадут о себе знать 🎗️ #GOGOCHIMERA
🔥9😍6👏5
Это какая крайность у людей внутри, что они не могут даже просто сесть и найти себе клиента более адекватным образом, чем обсирать того дизайнера, а потом этого же клиента еще и обманывать. Если вы действительно хотите заработать в сфере дизайна, то только лишь упорно наработав репутацию. Обман и ложь два самых подлых удела человека, которые портят его абсолютно во всем, оно и в жизни так потом. Работайте с умом, …
⚡4❤🔥1
«Подпишусь на него, украду у него клиентов с постов и еще обосру в лс с его же клиентом, мне же ничего за это не будет». Пошла тенденция у молодых «дизайнеров» последнее время такая - чутка уверенная, а может и не чутка. Вот сидит эта 🐒 у меня в паблике, в комментариях ничего не пишет, просто молча наблюдает, а оказывается не просто и не молча, и не наблюдает, а крадет каждого второго клиента с поста. Мало того, л…
⚡4😱1
⛳️
🔥10❤🔥2⚡1
Вот такой логотип разработал для команды Xetonage, смотри ниже, там аватарка 🚀
❤🔥8🔥4😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nrygrph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nry” (@nrygrph), 134 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nrygrph.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.