Channel
@nstavv_math
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
648subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002167191898 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nstavv_math |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nstavv_math |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:37 | 648 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:18 | 652 | +6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:08 | 646 | -2 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 648 | +6 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 642 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 647 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 650 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:47 | 650 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
106 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 48.1% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 11.3% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 11.3% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5260571601652428566 | 5 | 4.72% | |
| custom 5323276878633519609 | 5 | 4.72% | |
| custom 5370959021438146805 | 5 | 4.72% | |
| custom 5325705923157582015 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.943% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❇️здесь есть отзывы о занятиях со мной https://t.me/review_nstavv 🎇в видео 🌠в голосовых 🎇текстом, кружками, и всеми возможными способами, которыми вы благодарите меня за работу Спасибо вам, будем продолжать идти к успехам в новом учебном году 🤍
❤5🔥3🥰2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Подробно описала изменения в этих постах еще 2 недели назад, сразу же как они были анонсированы 🌟часть 1 🌟часть 2 🌟часть 3 но сейчас дополню в кружках некоторые детали
❤3⚡2custom 52605716016524285662
Весь этот проект изменений профиля назвали "усиление практической направленности экзамена" заскринила вам описание новых заданий, вот какими навыками должен обладать выпускник начиная с этого года 👆 упор на математическое моделирование, вероятность и статистику, экзамен становится более практичным и более интересным, и да, для тех кто привык мыслить алгоритмами - более сложным ждем, какие прототипы добавят в банк …
❤4custom 53232768786335196092custom 53709590214381468052
️Вышла демоверсия ЕГЭ 2027 все изменения, которые были опубликованы ранее, вошли в нее 🥲
❤3custom 53709590214381468053custom 53257059231575820152
Материалы в деле Запись на пробное занятие @nstavv 👀🤍✉️
👍4❤2🔥2
В июле делилась с вами алгоритмом для решения уравнений на самом деле много материалов обновила за лето знаю, что еще бОльшую боль вызывают уравнения объединённые в системы потому что здесь важно уловить смысл происходящего: подстановка или сложение не решают систему, эти преобразования просто помогают создать уравнение с одной переменной(буквой), чтобы его можно было дорешать а вторая переменная легко находится…
👍5⚡3🔥2
Хочется и отдохнуть и выспаться и гулять с друзьями целыми днями но я уверена, ты скажешь себе спасибо, если найдешь хотя бы 10-15 минут на повторение математики на этой неделе 🌟если ты идешь в 7 класс - повтори решение уравнений, и раскрытие скобок 🌟если ты идешь в 8 класс - повтори признаки равенства треугольников и свойства степеней 🌟если ты идешь в 9 класс, значит через год ОГЭ - повтори свойства различных тр…
❤4⚡3🔥2
Что изменили в ОГЭ? наконец-то дождались демку, объявляю сезон подготовки к ОГЭ 2027 открытым! и новости хорошие - пока все без изменений! 👋 но важно отметить, что в прошлом и в этом году в ОГЭ добавили много новых заданий и именно их мы и видим в демоверсии 🌟особенно хочу обратить ваше внимание что в задании 20 неравенство 🌟после последнего дропа задачек в банк, прототипы с неравенствами у многих вызвали трудн…
❤4⚡3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nstavv_math. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Математика с Натальей | ОГЭ ЕГЭ профиль / база” (@nstavv_math), 648 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nstavv_math.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.