Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Научно-техническая стратегия государства

Channel

Научно-техническая стратегия государства

@ntstg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,098subscribers

+134 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001837183939
TypeChannel
Username@ntstg
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ntstg

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,9644,0984,0316 August 2026 — 3,964 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,964 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,966 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,968 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,974 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,986 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,055 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,062 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,080 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,082 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,085 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,098 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net +134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,944–4,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 08:164,098+13
3 Sept 2026, 16:364,085+3
31 Aug 2026, 04:334,082+2
28 Aug 2026, 08:434,080+18
25 Aug 2026, 03:244,062+7
21 Aug 2026, 20:174,055+69
18 Aug 2026, 06:223,986+12
15 Aug 2026, 03:173,974+6
12 Aug 2026, 02:473,968+2
9 Aug 2026, 06:113,966+2
6 Aug 2026, 13:013,964no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:373,964first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

366 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13236.1%
💯6116.7%
4913.4%
🔥277.38%
❤‍🔥205.46%
🤔195.19%
🤪154.10%
🙏92.46%
🥴71.91%
😁61.64%
🫡51.37%
👀30.82%
🤝30.82%
👻20.546%
🤯20.546%
🌚10.273%
🎉10.273%
👏10.273%
😡10.273%
🤨10.273%
1 further kind10.273%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 366 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ntstg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC583 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

“Всё под присмотром машин любящей благодати” В 1967 году Ричард Бротиган написал стихотворение All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace. Перевод: Мне нравится думать (и чем скорее, тем лучше!) о кибернетическом лугу, где млекопитающие и компьютеры живут вместе в гармонии, программируя друг друга, как чистая вода, касающаяся ясного неба. Мне нравится думать (прямо сейчас, пожалуйста!) о кибернетическом лесу, п

4🥴2🤯1

5 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC592 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Промышленность без тыла (окончание) начало https://t.me/ntstg/1969 Подробный обзор «Создание и развитие военной промышленности антияпонских опорных районов» есть на сайте Национального управления КНР по философским и общественным наукам (материал на китайском языке, автоматически переводится браузером). Там описана вся производственная система: • сеть из десяти специализированных предприятий в районе Тайханя;

👍6🔥2🫡1🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC540 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Промышленность без тыла (продолжение) Начало https://t.me/ntstg/1969 Японское командование понимало значение Хуанъядуна. В ноябре 1941 года для уничтожения арсенала была предпринята крупная операция с участием нескольких тысяч военнослужащих. Бои продолжались восемь суток. Защитники использовали труднодоступный рельеф и заранее подготовленные позиции, не позволив быстро прорваться к промышленной площадке и уничтожи

3🫡1

5 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC568 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Промышленность без тыла (продолжение) Начало: https://t.me/ntstg/1969 Централизованными оставались управление, техническая документация и распределение специалистов. Само производство можно было разделять и переносить. В результате промышленность не имела единственной точки, уничтожение которой остановило бы всю систему. Недостаток сырья компенсировали системной переработкой. Собирали стреляные гильзы, сортировали

🫡1

5 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈15,500 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Промышленность без тыла (начало) В 1939 году в горах Тайханшань, глубоко за линией японского фронта, начала работать оружейная фабрика 8-й маршрутной армии Китая. У неё не было тыла. Города, железные дороги и заводы находились под контролем противника. Поставки оружия и оборудования были недостаточны и ненадёжны. Любая обнаруженная производственная площадка могла стать целью авиаудара или наземной карательной опера

4🫡1

16 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC≈21,200 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Оправдались ли ваши ожидания от работы инженером?

  1. Да, всё отлично: есть карьерный рост, ЗП выше рынка, работаю без переработок11%
  2. Нет, я «пожарный» на окладе: ЗП меньше, чем у рабочих, работаю за троих, карьерного роста нет.20%
  3. У меня не зарплатная мотивация (предприн-во, волонтерство, творчество...) так что трудно, но не ною.7%
  4. Я не инженер, мне посмотреть результаты62%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6🌚1😡1🙏1

13 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC≈21,200 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Алексей, можно подумать, что туземцы, колонизированные европейцами в прошлом, недостаточно яростно сражались. Или, может быть, медведь в берлоге проигрывает потому, что недостаточно зол на охотников? Если нет технологического превосходства, можно строить из себя хоть берсерка, хоть кота Леопольда, да хоть кого угодно: это не поможет. А выбор в пользу отставания сделали все вместе, вот и результат. Ну конечно, про

👍12💯9🤔21👀1🤯1

12 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC≈1,870 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Робототехника на стыке IT, безопасности, кооперации и менеджмента - доклад Игоря Брылева (@robossembler_ru) на конференции CoopDays.

👍12🤔1

5 Jul 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,490 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему важен open source hardware подход в сфере научного оборудования Аргументы от Джошуа Пирса: 1. Патенты на ранней стадии области особенно вредны. Если в зрелой отрасли патент закрывает отдельную техническую ветку, то в новой области он закрывает саму траекторию развития. 2. Патенты на “строительные блоки” блокируют не продукт, а целое дерево будущих решений. Патентование базовых технологий мешает последующим

👍10😁2💯1🔥1🤔1

5 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC≈1,800 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Джошуа Пирс и open-source фабрика Известный канадский ученый Джошуа Пирс работает на пересечении open-source hardware, автономного производства, энергетики и выживания без инфраструктуры. Его группа FAST занимается open source appropriate technology - технологиями, которые можно локально воспроизводить, ремонтировать и адаптировать под инфраструктурно слабые сообщества. Они развивают солнечные самовоспроизводящиеся

👍14🔥92🤔2😁1

30 Jun 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,490 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DIESCHWALBE1917Photo

👥 Друзья, напоминаем! 5 июля в Москве пройдёт семинар «Антропология неоиндустриализации» Приглашаем всех, кто хочет понять, как меняется сам человек внутри современной техносферы. В павильоне №44 на проспекте Мира, 119, с 11:00 до 17:00 соберутся инженеры, философы, специалисты по ИИ, медики и все, кому важно увидеть промышленность будущего без слепых пятен. Возможно очное и онлайн‑участие (ссылки пришлём заранее).

👍11❤‍🔥3🤝2😁2🫡1🙏1

30 Jun 2026, 09:01 UTC≈3,410 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Народная экономика - это не доверие к кормушке, а выход из зависимости от неё Алексей Живов верно ставит вопрос: стране нужны внутренние ресурсы, длинные деньги, малые инженерные команды и новая инвестиционная среда. Но народную экономику нельзя строить на доверии к системе, которая десятилетиями это доверие разрушала. В российской истории административное изъятие повторялось постоянно. Сегодня собственность закон

❤‍🔥17🤪9👍86🙏2🤝1🤨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ntstg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTCAnonymous Poll2,580 voters approx.

Оправдались ли ваши ожидания от работы инженером?

  1. Да, всё отлично: есть карьерный рост, ЗП выше рынка, работаю без переработок11%
  2. Нет, я «пожарный» на окладе: ЗП меньше, чем у рабочих, работаю за троих, карьерного роста нет.20%
  3. У меня не зарплатная мотивация (предприн-во, волонтерство, творчество...) так что трудно, но не ною.7%
  4. Я не инженер, мне посмотреть результаты62%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Научно-техническая стратегия государства” (@ntstg), 4,098 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ntstg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.