Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NURSEX ALPHA

Channel

NURSEX ALPHA

@nursexalpha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,231subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002098287102
TypeChannel
Username@nursexalpha
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nursexalpha

Growth

4,2314,2524,241.511 September 2026 — 4,252 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,245 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,231 subscribers11 September 202616 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 5 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,228–4,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 12:574,231-14
12 Sept 2026, 18:394,245-7
11 Sept 2026, 03:224,252first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.84%
avg views ÷ 4,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
162
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held19 (23 March 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total1,137
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 03:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 22:42 UTC81 viewsread 11 September 2026

solana bondalana mfers bond everything that they see fock it, full port in RH and couple of strong projects on SOL

8 Sept 2026, 23:37 UTC160 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

My next take is $STRATTON, has fallen ~61% from its ATH ($9.5M → $3.7M) Marked thoughts on the support/selling pressure zones: Support (green) S1 — $3.4–3.8M (being tested now) First real demand after the dump. Same area as the mid-range grind before the Sep 8 spike. Hold here = dip buyers still in. Lose it on a 15m close and it flips to supply. S2 — $2.5–3.0M (hard support) Sep 5–7 base before the vertical. This…

8 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC123 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

It was obviously dip and we made some money here Congratulations to everyone who profited here too

7 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC171 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Find out that $SHROOM has fallen by -60% from its ATH Marked my thoughts about support/selling pressure zones on the chart: Support (green) S1 — $20–22M (being tested now) First real demand after the dump. Same area as the Sep 5 first impulse pause. Hold here = dip buyers still in. Lose it on a 15m close and it flips to supply. S2 — $12–15M (hard support) Sep 4 highs before the vertical. This is the first level I…

7 Sept 2026, 15:45 UTC177 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

You need to lose a lot of money to become profitable in memecoins I lost fifty grand in a year and now just hit $100k profit in a single month We are so fucking back

6 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

How to use Stoikov's market microstructure on Polymarket (beginner guide) Every price you see is set by someone managing risk, and automated traders make money off people who trade on emotion. Your only job is to not be the easy money. > A price is a probability. 40 cents = crowd thinks ~40% likely. Is the real chance higher or lower? > You have an edge only when your estimate differs for a real reason, not a feeli…

12 Jul 2026, 16:39 UTC≈1,680 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

I just found out Polymarket is up to 3x cheaper than Hyperliquid Imagine you're trading around $100M per 30 days and lets calculate it: Taker Fees: - Polymarket perps: 0.027% - Hyperliquid: 0.035% Maker Fees: - Polymarket perps: 0.002% - Hyperliquid: 0.008% - Taker fees on Polymarket cheaper than Hyperliquid by 30% - Maker fees on Polymarket cheaper than Hyperliquid by 300% Hyperliquid's short 14-day period arti…

7 Jul 2026, 00:36 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

It need to be resolved YES or at least 50-50 https://x.com/nursexxl/status/2074290108216582321

30 Jun 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 11 September 2026

While everyone calling him an "insider" This trader just converting his shares when the outcome is already known Today "BreakTheBank" converted bets three times throughout the match https://x.com/nursexxl/status/2071975909759095152

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nursexalpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Airdrops Gem | Crypto Airdrops
@airdropx · 27,047
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NURSEX ALPHA” (@nursexalpha), 4,231 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nursexalpha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.