@flutter

Channel
آموزش و ارتقاء مهارت های بالینی
@nursing_refrences
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,977subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001093181154 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nursing_refrences |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nursing_refrences |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 2,977 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 2,979 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 2,981 | +4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 2,977 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 2,983 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 2,986 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 2,987 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 2,983 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 2,992 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 2,994 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 2,991 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 2,996 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 2,997 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 2,997 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 29 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 44s
- Average length
- 2m 44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 93.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
کانال آموزشی گام آخر پرستاری 👩🏻⚕🫀 مرور مطالب پرستاری با رویکردی متفاوت؛ آموزش بیسیک نوار قلب و اریتمی ها، شرح کامل پروسیجرهای پزشکی و پرستاری ، مطالب رمز گذاری شده رفرنس ارشد و بسیاری مطالب دیگر .. @nursechannel
❤3
AHA 2025 only Algorithms
❤1
جدیدترین گایدلاین احیا 2025 انتشار همین امروز
بسیار بسیار مهم Key Updates from BLS 2020 to 2025 1. Compression-to-Ventilation Ratios • 2020 Guidelines: For adults, the ratio was 30 compressions to 2 breaths for both single and two-rescuer scenarios. For infants and children, the ratio was 30:2 for a single rescuer and 15:2 for two rescuers. 2025 Updates: The ratio remains the same for adults. However, for infants and children, the emphasis has shifted towards…
آموزش و ارتقاء مهارت های بالینی pinned «جناب آقای محمدرضا ظفرقندی وزیر محترم بهداشت، درمان و آموزش پزشکی با سلام و احترام ما جمعی از داوطلبان آزمون استخدامی وزارت بهداشت ۱۴۰۴، نسبت به نحوه امتیازدهی نمره کرونا در کارنامههای صادر شده اعتراض داریم. در این آزمون، امتیاز مربوط به کرونا بر اساس خوداظهاری…»
جناب آقای محمدرضا ظفرقندی وزیر محترم بهداشت، درمان و آموزش پزشکی با سلام و احترام ما جمعی از داوطلبان آزمون استخدامی وزارت بهداشت ۱۴۰۴، نسبت به نحوه امتیازدهی نمره کرونا در کارنامههای صادر شده اعتراض داریم. در این آزمون، امتیاز مربوط به کرونا بر اساس خوداظهاری اولیه درج شده است، در حالی که در این خوداظهاری، بازهای مشخص برای کسب این امتیاز تعریف نشده بود و بسیاری بهصورت نامحدود این امتیاز را وارد کردند. بنابراین، ک…
❤1
آموزش و ارتقاء مهارت های بالینی pinned Deleted message
در این ویدیو تفاوت همدلی و همدردی را یاد میگیریم. #روانپرستاری #اخلاق_حرفهای @nursechannel
نحوه آماده سازی داروهای مهم بخش های ویژه
طبق جدیدترین آمار، درصد خطای پزشکی، پرستاراندر بخش های ویژه ایران برابر ۶۴٪ بوده ! ۱۸ درصد تزریق دارو با سرعت نادرست، ۱۵ درصد دوز نادرست، ۱۲ درصد در زمان نادرست، ۹ درصد داروی نادرست. منابع کمکی در تزریقات دارویی برای پزشکان و پرستاران: http://www.gicu.sgul.ac.uk https://globalrph.com این سایت برای محاسبه دوزاژ داروها و سرعت infusion ها خیلی مناسبه، منابع دیگه مثل آپتودیت و MDCalc هم هستن ولی این کاملتره میتونید…
جزوه EKG دستنویس نیست در جهان😏 پاتوفیزیولوژی تغییرات نوار رو هم نوشتم اگه وقت کافی داشتین همشو بخونین اگه وقتتون محدودتر بود فقط هایلایتها رو بخونین
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nursing_refrences. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Whats your diagnosis?
- CHB45%
- FAVB16%
- Mobitz— (II 2:1)39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2025 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@medicalservic · 28,930
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش و ارتقاء مهارت های بالینی” (@nursing_refrences), 2,977 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nursing_refrences.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.