Channel
@nutri_mind_1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
548subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001914913243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nutri_mind_1 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nutri_mind_1 |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 548 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 549 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 552 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 554 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 554 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
82 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 30 | 36.6% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 30.5% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 11.0% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 8.54% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 7.32% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 2.44% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вечерний контент - для любителей жирного ужина и набитого желудка) Это не про силу воли, это про гормон окситоцин (наш главный гормон безопасности и спокойствия), и это доказано научными исследованиями Когда нам тревожно или одиноко, мозг ищет самый быстрый способ его получить. Жирная еда и сильно растянутый желудок механически давят на блуждающий нерв, давая ту самую долгожданную дозу успокоения. Но цена этого ком…
👍2
Выше слишком длинный текст, ну нафиг так 🔥 Да, хотим кратко ❤️ Пойдет 👍 Лучше подкасты, если много рассказывать Голосуем реакциями
❤2👍1🔥1
Сколько раз в неделю вы переедаете? Этот вопрос из скринингового опросника на расстройства пищевого поведения (РПП) заставил меня серьезно задуматься. А что мы вообще считаем перееданием? Где проходит эта граница? В классическом понимании и в диагностике РПП основной маркер переедания (бинджа) — это потеря контроля над объемом пищи. Например: вы съедаете целую пиццу, запиваете колой и заедаете мороженым за один при…
❤3
Voice message, posted without a caption
🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩 Про самый популярный овощ лета, который раньше украшал сады Европы как декоративный цветок, а сегодня любимчик нутрициолога😎
🔥3
Ждите подкаст про самый популярный овощ лета)
😁5
С началом новой недели, дорогие! Факт дня: самое тяжёлое - это чувство вины после "запрещенки". Стресс от самобичевания повышает наш кортизол, который ведёт к накоплению веса сильнее, чем лишний бургер или пирожное. Мой триггер - чипсы А что вам сложнее всего простить себе в еде?
🥰1
На самом деле - периодически использовать психологические функции еды, а не только есть чтобы жить и получать нутриенты - абсолютно нормально. Сложности начинаются там, где мысли о еде, весе, образе тела - становится основным смыслом жизни и без контроля над ними не будет ничего - счастья, любви, внимания, хорошей работы... (Список можно продолжать) Сейчас много говорят про РПП, есть для этого и опросники - однако …
❤1
Что для вас еда?
The shares total 266%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Почему ваш ИМТ не имеет значения? (Или имеет, но не так, как вы думаете) Мы привыкли смотреть на ИМТ (индекс массы тела) и считать его превышение (более 30 - ожирение) , однако в мировой доказательной медицине есть Эдмондская система стадирования ожирения (EOSS) - и именно она определяет влияние избыточного веса на здоровье Стадия 0 - есть лишний вес, но нет никаких ухудшений качества жизни и повышения давления, гл…
✍1👍1
В последнее время много думаю что я делаю и зачем, в каком направлении идти дальше. Еда без драмы - новый вектор, и это не про бодипозитив и жрать все что не приколочено без разбора и забивать на здоровье. Нет. Абсолютно нет. Я нутрициолог с учётом психологии, на данный момент работаю с доказательной научной базой. И я знаю факты: 📌 Ожирение - это системное многофакторное хроническое рецидивирующее заболевание 📌 …
🙏6❤2
Спасибо всем, кто был вчера на эфире ❤️ Было очень ценно провести это время вместе! Кто не успел — обязательно посмотрите запись 📹 О чем говорили на эфире: ✅ Глютен: действительно ли он вреден и кому важно его исключать ✅ Молочные продукты: зло или нормальная часть рациона ✅ «Суперфуды»: реальная польза или маркетинг ✅ Почему в нутрициологии так много противоречий ✅ Как отличать науку от мифов и не теряться в пото…
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nutri_mind_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что для вас еда?
The shares total 266%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Еда без драмы” (@nutri_mind_1), 548 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nutri_mind_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.