Channel
@nuya_maria
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
90subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001932594315 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nuya_maria |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nuya_maria |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 90 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 89 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 86 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 85 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 85 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
363 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 134 | 36.9% | |
| 👍 | 104 | 28.7% | |
| 🔥 | 94 | 25.9% | |
| custom 5204085583344835593 | 10 | 2.75% | |
| custom 5422703636369130033 | 8 | 2.20% | |
| custom 5458724869950677062 | 7 | 1.93% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.38% | |
| custom 5244827458431107252 | 1 | 0.275% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я взяла себя в руки и засела делать план небольшого подкаста по книге «пятьдесят восемь лет в Третьяковской галерее» Николая Мудрогеля Обсудим: — как 15-летний мальчик стал хранителем главной сокровищницы России; — каким был Третьяков в жизни (спойлер: скромный, строгий, но трогательный); — почему эта книга — уникальный документ эпохи. Уже читали? Или впервые слышите? 👇
👍10🔥9❤7custom 52040855833448355932
И во гневе за меч ухватился Поток: «Что за хан на Руси своеволит?» Но вдруг слышит слова: «То земной едет бог, То отец наш казнить нас изволит!» И на улице, сколько там было толпы, Воеводы, бояре, монахи, попы, Мужики, старики и старухи — Все пред ним повалились на брюхи. *** И подумал Поток: «Уж, Господь борони, Не проснулся ли слишком я рано? Ведь вчера еще, лежа на брюхе, они Обожали московского хана, А сегодня …
👍7❤5🔥4
Ну и как вам???
❤15custom 52040855833448355938👍6👏2
И сейчас я думаю: а было ли это ошибкой вовсе? Может, мой мозг просто построил идеальный мост между «серебряным» веком и «красным» — через одного вымышленного Толстого, который вобрал в себя и былинную тоску по чести, и гротеск XX века. Я до сих пор считаю, что «Князь Серебряный» и «Похождения Невзорова» — идеальная пара для понимания того, как русская литература переломилась пополам. Так что теперь, если меня спрос…
🔥6❤4👍4
Но где тут возникает вопросы — Алексеев Толстых двое Чем они отличаются: ну во1) отчеством, во2) жили в разное время, в 3) писали, конечно, на разные темы Я должна кое в чём признаться. Мой роман с Алексеем Константиновичем Толстым начался с «Князя Серебряного». Иван Грозный, опричнина, кромешная тьма и один серебряный луч в лице князя Никиты Романовича — я ушла в этот текст с головой, как в гиперфикс. Это был осо…
❤5👍4🔥4custom 52448274584311072521
Если я со школы ненавижу обращения по фамилии и стараюсь так называть только отбросов (ну типа людей хуже гитлера (а вот не зря его только по фамилии называют)), поэтому Льва Толстого никогда не было в путанице Толстых, несмотря на то, что этот клан (литературный спрут) захватил русскую культуру на несколько веков. И если даже Льва и Алексеев мало, я напомню, что Сергей Львович занимался литературой, Илья Львович, Ал…
❤5👍4custom 54587248699506770623
С утра начнем разбираться в Толстых Если с Львом Николаевичем вопросов не возникает, то Алексеев мы разберем подробнее
❤16👍15🔥12
Кстати, в главной книжке для нашей страны сейчас, «Незнайке на Луне», упомянута соль. Пока по этой причине её не запретили, рекомендую перечитать. https://t.me/banki_oil/51470
❤10🔥9👍8
Video message, posted without a caption
❤9👍5🔥5
Video message, posted without a caption
👍6❤4👏3custom 54587248699506770622
Video message, posted without a caption
❤8👍5🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7🔥5👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nuya_maria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мария Нуйа | Амбассадор романа «Бесы»” (@nuya_maria), 90 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nuya_maria.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.