Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NOVA CUP

Channel

NOVA CUP

@nvcup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

354subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002288899486
TypeChannel
Username@nvcup
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nvcup

Growth

354357355.58 August 2026 — 357 subscribers9 August 2026 — 356 subscribers29 August 2026 — 354 subscribers8 August 202629 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 20 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 354–357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 00:17354-2
9 Aug 2026, 09:53356-1
8 Aug 2026, 13:00357first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

464 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥10723.1%
custom 53350763306166893848217.7%
🔥7415.9%
custom 53552489931420799095311.4%
custom 5224510377630405418469.91%
🤯439.27%
custom 5427082523031153726143.02%
🏆102.16%
custom 542715447661825461491.94%
custom 533461259440780258171.51%
custom 536166748675849883461.29%
😍61.29%
custom 542924519797846823530.647%
custom 536188371688701709020.431%
custom 542698130353688215710.216%
💯10.216%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 464 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC196 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❄️ Зима на «Лиговском» — время большого футбола! 🏆 NOVA CUP WINTER SERIES Возвращается — и это будет совсем другой турнир. 🔥 ЧТО НОВОГО? Мы полностью обновили формат: ⚽️ ФОРМАТ ▫️ 2 дивизиона по 7 команд ▫️ Игровой день — каждое воскресенье 📍 ЛОКАЦИЯ Футбольный Комплекс Лиговский 📲 ЗАЯВКИ По всем вопросам: TG — @khaaruss VK — @orgnvcupmp ⚡️ Успей занять место в новом сезоне!

❤‍🔥19custom 53552489931420799097🔥5💯1😍1

1 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC402 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Забег на новый сезон начинается... прямо сейчас В этом видео столкнулись наши чемпионы @DeMun172, @Fara_05_10 а в руках у них — конверты. Где, когда, как? 🤫 Пока только эти кадры и координаты внутри. Включайте уведомления, чтобы не проспать большой анонс!

🔥14custom 535524899314207990911❤‍🔥7

25 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC448 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Мы готовим не просто турнир. Мы готовим событие 😈 Ждите большой пост 🔥

🔥23custom 535524899314207990917🤯11🏆4

1 May 2026, 11:10 UTC921 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡️ ТРОЙКА ФИНАЛИСТОВ. ЗОЛОТОЙ МЯЧ NOVA CUP 2026 Они прошли всю дистанцию. Оставили за спиной сильнейших. И теперь стоят на самой вершине. Наши финалисты: 🔥 Ковалевский Андрей (Демьяна United) 🔥 Горецкий Виталий (Дворовые) 🔥 Суменков Никита (Демьяна United) Три имени. Один трофей. Двое уйдут без главного приза. 📅 17 мая — на главном награждении года мы вскроем конверт и узнаем имя обладателя Золотого мяча. А уже

🤯11🔥8🏆5

1 May 2026, 11:10 UTC490 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

4 место Коробейников Александр (Вавилон) 88 баллов

❤‍🔥9custom 52245103776304054187🤯2

1 May 2026, 11:04 UTC461 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Осталось четыре кандидата 🤯 А места всего три… Ковалевский Коробейников Горецкий Суменков

😍5🤯2custom 53616674867584988341

1 May 2026, 11:02 UTC414 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

5 место Драчиловский Константин (Вавилон) 87 баллов

custom 522451037763040541818🔥3

1 May 2026, 10:57 UTC405 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

6 место Хачатрян Айк (Физкультурник) 82 балла

custom 54271544766182546149custom 53350763306166893846❤‍🔥5🔥4

1 May 2026, 10:54 UTC393 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как видите результаты максимально близкие 😱 Продолжаем?❤️‍🔥

❤‍🔥9🔥5custom 53552489931420799095

1 May 2026, 10:52 UTC379 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

7 место Булах Геннадий (Экстра) 76 баллов

custom 542708252303115372613❤‍🔥8custom 53350763306166893848

1 May 2026, 10:47 UTC376 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

8 место Гречищев Алексей (Вавилон) 75 баллов

🤯10custom 53350763306166893848❤‍🔥7custom 52245103776304054186

1 May 2026, 10:41 UTC355 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

9 место Котов Ян (041) 74 балла

❤‍🔥10custom 53350763306166893846custom 53616674867584988345

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nvcup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NOVA CUP” (@nvcup), 354 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nvcup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.