Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for novenine πŸ”ž

Channel

novenine πŸ”ž

@nxvenine

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

2,761subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002190254673
TypeChannel
Username@nxvenine
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nxvenine

Topic

Other / unclassifiable β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,6772,7612,71910 August 2026 β€” 2,680 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 2,680 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 2,677 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 2,694 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 2,690 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 2,693 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 2,690 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 2,689 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 2,693 subscribers9 September 2026 β€” 2,755 subscribers12 September 2026 β€” 2,754 subscribers17 September 2026 β€” 2,761 subscribers10 August 202617 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 38 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,664–2,774 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 04:402,761+7
12 Sept 2026, 19:412,754-1
9 Sept 2026, 01:412,755+62
3 Sept 2026, 21:372,693+4
31 Aug 2026, 20:142,689-1
26 Aug 2026, 11:442,690-3
23 Aug 2026, 21:062,693+3
20 Aug 2026, 06:062,690-4
17 Aug 2026, 12:132,694+17
14 Aug 2026, 07:152,677-3
10 Aug 2026, 17:242,680no change
10 Aug 2026, 02:022,680first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5,319 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀2,89154.4%
πŸ”₯89816.9%
❀‍πŸ”₯54910.3%
πŸ’˜2214.15%
πŸ‘»1502.82%
πŸ₯°1172.20%
🌭901.69%
😭751.41%
πŸ’‹731.37%
πŸ“601.13%
🍌520.978%
😍470.884%
🍾430.808%
😁140.263%
πŸ‘130.244%
🀯70.132%
πŸŽƒ60.113%
πŸ‘€50.094%
πŸ—Ώ30.056%
πŸ’…20.038%
2 further kinds30.056%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 5,319 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
80
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for Β· 11%
Most on one post
78
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @nxvenine. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTCβ‰ˆ1,110 views220 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Π–ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΠΉ Π³ΠΈΡ„Ρ‚ ΠΎΡ‚ ATER πŸ₯Ή

❀‍πŸ”₯152πŸ”₯32❀29πŸŽƒ6🍾1

1 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTCβ‰ˆ2,330 views265 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΠΈΠ· Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… ΡŽΡ‡Π΅ΠΉ

πŸ‘»150❀72πŸ”₯24❀‍πŸ”₯8🌭3πŸ“3🍾2πŸ’‹2

28 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTCβ‰ˆ2,570 views286 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Π²ΠΎΡ‚ Π΅Ρ‰Π΅ Π²ΠΈΠΏΠΊΠ°

❀225πŸ₯°33🍾16❀‍πŸ”₯8πŸ”₯3😍1

28 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTCβ‰ˆ2,290 views230 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Π’Π²ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ Π³ΠΈΡ„Ρ‚ ΠΎΡ‚ MaKin

❀186πŸ₯°25πŸ”₯13❀‍πŸ”₯4πŸ“2

24 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTCβ‰ˆ2,360 views212 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @uglysayaPhoto

ляшки Π²ΠΊΡƒΡΠ½ΡΡˆΠΊΠΈ

❀179πŸ’‹18πŸ”₯8😍3πŸ’˜2❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ“1

12 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTCβ‰ˆ3,160 views117 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❀95😁14πŸ“6❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ—Ώ1

12 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTCβ‰ˆ2,770 views294 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

πŸ‘πŸ‘

❀228πŸ”₯35🍌19❀‍πŸ”₯8πŸ“2🌭1🍾1

8 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTCβ‰ˆ3,570 views308 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ΡƒΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡ„Π΅

πŸ’˜219❀56🍌14❀‍πŸ”₯9πŸ”₯5πŸ“2πŸ₯°2🍾1

5 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTCβ‰ˆ2,770 views189 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @djcomps_artPhoto

MURRICA HELL YEAH! УспСл ΠΊ Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Π½Π΄Ρƒ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΎΠΆΠΊΡƒ ГВА Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ ΠΊ 4 июля

πŸ”₯125❀44😍12❀‍πŸ”₯4πŸ“3πŸ’‹1

25 Jun 2026, 15:31 UTCβ‰ˆ3,590 views347 reactions78 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ρ‡Π΅Ρ‚Π° Π»Π΅Ρ‚Π½Π΅Π΅ ΠΆΠΎΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠ΅

πŸ”₯266🌭35🍾20❀16❀‍πŸ”₯4🍌2πŸ“2πŸ₯°2

23 Jun 2026, 13:26 UTCβ‰ˆ3,930 views386 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌴

❀287πŸ”₯54❀‍πŸ”₯22πŸ‘12πŸ‘€5πŸ“2😍2🌭1

20 Jun 2026, 10:46 UTCβ‰ˆ3,360 views312 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

πŸ’…

❀220πŸ”₯44πŸ₯°24❀‍πŸ”₯11πŸ“6🌭5πŸ’…2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nxvenine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions β€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œnovenine πŸ”žβ€ (@nxvenine), 2,761 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nxvenine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.