Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Offer | Все о Криптовалютах: Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT, Биткоин, BTC

Channel

Crypto Offer | Все о Криптовалютах: Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT, Биткоин, BTC

@nzt_ic

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

27,471subscribers

+10,393 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001208365823
TypeChannel
Username@nzt_ic
Description◾️Все о рынке криптовалют: - актуальные новости - статистика и аналитика - прогнозы и рекомендации ▪️Администратор: @cryptooffer_admin
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nzt_ic

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@acryptoru/318274 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC@nzt_ic/3567 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC1.00under a minute
@acryptoru/318285 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC@nzt_ic/3568 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC1.00under a minute
@acryptoru/318325 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC@nzt_ic/3569 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC1.00under a minute
@acryptoru/318355 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC@nzt_ic/3570 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@nzt_ic/3571 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC@acryptoru/318396 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@acryptoru/318436 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC@nzt_ic/3572 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@acryptoru9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@acryptoru (9–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 9 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 22 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @acryptoru. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

17,07529,13723,1067 August 2026 — 17,078 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,075 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,942 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,835 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,488 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,461 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,395 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,357 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,332 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,283 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,247 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,221 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,209 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,175 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,155 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,142 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,080 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,050 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,035 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,008 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,346 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,039 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,886 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,621 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,300 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,013 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,978 subscribers5 September 2026 — 26,160 subscribers8 September 2026 — 28,294 subscribers11 September 2026 — 28,052 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,105 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,124 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,037 subscribers18 September 2026 — 28,598 subscribers25 September 2026 — 29,057 subscribers4 October 2026 — 28,913 subscribers12 October 2026 — 29,137 subscribers14 October 2026 — 29,089 subscribers15 October 2026 — 29,041 subscribers16 October 2026 — 29,003 subscribers17 October 2026 — 28,951 subscribers18 October 2026 — 28,926 subscribers19 October 2026 — 28,840 subscribers20 October 2026 — 28,764 subscribers21 October 2026 — 28,676 subscribers22 October 2026 — 28,552 subscribers23 October 2026 — 28,484 subscribers24 October 2026 — 28,403 subscribers25 October 2026 — 28,335 subscribers26 October 2026 — 28,243 subscribers27 October 2026 — 28,145 subscribers28 October 2026 — 28,040 subscribers29 October 2026 — 27,950 subscribers30 October 2026 — 27,625 subscribers31 October 2026 — 27,542 subscribers1 November 2026 — 27,388 subscribers2 November 2026 — 27,469 subscribers3 November 2026 — 27,340 subscribers4 November 2026 — 27,357 subscribers5 November 2026 — 27,471 subscribers27,4717 August 20265 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 90 days, net +10,393. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,266–30,946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 17:2427,471+114
4 Nov 2026, 15:3027,357+17
3 Nov 2026, 14:2627,340-129
2 Nov 2026, 13:1027,469+81
1 Nov 2026, 12:1727,388-154
31 Oct 2026, 11:1627,542-83
30 Oct 2026, 14:2827,625-325
29 Oct 2026, 17:4927,950-90
28 Oct 2026, 20:5128,040-105
27 Oct 2026, 19:3028,145-98
26 Oct 2026, 19:4628,243-92
25 Oct 2026, 18:2528,335-68
24 Oct 2026, 19:0928,403-81
23 Oct 2026, 20:4528,484-68
22 Oct 2026, 22:5728,552-124
21 Oct 2026, 21:3028,676-88
20 Oct 2026, 13:1928,764-76
19 Oct 2026, 09:5628,840-86
18 Oct 2026, 08:2828,926-25
17 Oct 2026, 07:5428,951first reading

Engagement

160 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 144 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.7%
avg views ÷ 27,471 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,710
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 160 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held160 (29 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total496,540
Reactions total7,559
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 02:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,840
Videos
≈1
Links
≈476

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

16,307 reactions across 156 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3,78823.2%
❤3,75523.0%
👍3,71222.8%
😱8915.46%
👎8765.37%
😢8665.31%
🤔6093.73%
🆒4933.02%
👀4592.81%
✍4512.77%
🫡3992.45%
👏80.049%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 156 of the 160 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 57 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 13:10 UTC≈4,970 views130 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

👨🏼‍💻Аналитики маркетмейкера Wintermute выражают сомнения в устойчивом восстановлении биткоина после ликвидации позиций трейдеров на 1,5 млрд долларов. По их оценке, текущий рост котировок не подкреплён достаточным уровнем спроса на спотовом рынке - это ставит под вопрос устойчивость наблюдаемой динамики и может указывать на преобладание спекулятивных факторов в текущей ценовой динамике.

❤31🔥27🆒27👍25😢9👎4🤔4😱3

4 Nov 2026, 16:04 UTC≈6,820 views141 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

📶CryptoQuant: Количество активных адресов в сети XRP Ledger (XRPL) за последний месяц, с 3 октября по 3 ноября, выросло на 132%, с 15678 до 36342. Это говорит об активности пользователей в сети, несмотря на падение курса криптовалюты XRP.

✍33🔥31❤28👍20😱10🤔8😢7👎4

4 Nov 2026, 11:50 UTC≈7,940 views137 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#BCHUSD: (d1) После появления бычьего вымпела, фигура была пробита вниз, что говорит об исчерпании сил у быков. Далее курс просел к 256$, что довольно близко к 23.6% Фибо. Затем началась консолидация, а сейчас появился молот, что с учетом сигнала от aroon, может толкнуть цену выше, примерно к 320$. Состоялся запуск фьючерсов на BCH на CME Group. На фоне переносов выплат кредиторам обанкротившейся биржи (а там в общей…

👍33❤26👀26🔥24🤔9😱9👎6😢4

4 Nov 2026, 09:33 UTC≈7,030 views126 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🏛Уточнение от Центробанка: криптообменники могут хранить активы на кошельках - так называемых «адресах‑идентификаторах», не привязанных к цифровым депозитариям, сообщили в Банке России в разъяснениях к последним изменениям законодательства. ♻️Кроме того, госрегулируемые криптообменники вправе проводить сделки с цифровыми валютами через DeFi‑протоколы - в том числе через децентрализованные биржи вроде Uniswap. По нор…

🔥30👍27🆒25❤23😢9🤔6👎5😱1

3 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC≈8,380 views135 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#ETHUSD: (h2) Несмотря на пробой треугольника вверх и подъем к 2392$, позже курс опустился к 2176$, причиной стал всеобщий спад. Быки понемногу отыгрываются, вернулись к 2318$, но пробиться выше 23.6% Фибо пока не получается. Хакер, взломавший Mercado Bitcoin на $46 млн, перевел Эфиры стоимостью $8 млн на несколько новых криптоадресов. Продолжился рост использования решений второго уровня (Layer 2, например, Arbitrum…

🆒32❤29👍27🔥24🤔8👎7😢4😱4

3 Nov 2026, 12:17 UTC≈9,850 views131 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

✅Компания Strategy после десятинедельного перерыва вновь купила Биткоины. Она приобрела 4603 BTC по средней цене 80318 долларов - теперь её общие резервы составляют 845050 BTC. Покупка профинансирована за счёт выручки от размещения акций: на закупку направили около 369.7 миллиона долларов из 602.8 миллиона привлечённых средств. Глава Strategy Майкл Сэйлор прокомментировал возобновление закупок фразой «We’re Back». В …

👍34❤28✍26🔥23👎7😱5🤔4😢4

3 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC≈9,620 views133 reactionsread 6 November 2026

⚠️Неизвестные взломали крупнейшую бразильскую криптобиржу Mercado Bitcoin и вывели активы на сумму, по предварительной оценке $40 млн. Площадка подтвердила факт атаки и остановила операции по вводу и выводу средств. 👨🏻‍💻Кроме того, блокчейн-аналитик ZachXBT заявил, что у неназванной им европейской компании кто-то украл более $106 млн в стейблкоинах. Злоумышленники вывели USDC и USDT со счетов этой компании на нескол…

🔥31👍28👀26❤25😢8😱7👎5🤔3

2 Nov 2026, 16:30 UTC≈10,900 views117 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#BTCUSD: (h2) После ложного пробоя вниз, цена все же вышла из фигуры вверх и поползла выше, надо отметить с трудом. Удалось добраться к 78762$, теперь курс откатывается и по всей видимости продолжит падать к 76700$, далее ожидается флэт. 31 октября криптосообщество неофициально отметило "день белой книги" Биткоина. Ровно 18 лет назад, в 2008 году, Сатоши Накамото опубликовал в рассылке криптографов текст «Bitcoin: A …

✍30❤26🔥19👍15🤔10😢6😱6👎5

2 Nov 2026, 11:50 UTC≈10,600 views129 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

⚠️BTCPay Server сообщил о краже криптовалюты из горячих кошельков - атака затронула установки на старых версиях ПО. Уязвимость актуальна для версий 2.4.1 и старше (выпуск - 23 июля 2026 года), тогда как в актуальной версии 2.4.7 инцидентов не зафиксировано. Злоумышленник получал права администратора; точный вектор атаки команда ещё выясняет. Разработчики настоятельно рекомендуют обновиться и напоминают: в горячих кош…

❤29🔥25👍23✍14🫡14🤔10😢8😱6

2 Nov 2026, 08:38 UTC≈10,200 views135 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Доброе утро! 💰Капитализация криптоэкономики: $2.61 трлн. 💵Объем торгов: 44.74B 💥Доля биткоина: 59.97% ТОП-10 — 2 ноября 2026 года Изменения курса за последние 24 часа: Bitcoin (BTC)$78083 +0.1% Ethereum (ETH)$2291 +0.91% Binance Coin(BNB)$709 +0.25% Ripple (XRP)$1.25 -0.18% Solana (SOL)$94.37 -1.24% Tron (TRX) $0.3152 +1.74% Hypeliquid (HYPE)$86.51 -1.24% Zcash (ZEC) $1257 +0.61% Dogecoin(DOGE)$0.07524 -0.71% Moner…

👍31❤28🫡28🔥22🤔8😱8👎5😢5

1 Nov 2026, 17:35 UTC≈11,100 views107 reactionsread 6 November 2026

⚠️Ущерб от взлома Binance в $6,36 млрд разошелся по девяти блокчейнам, больше половины пришлось на Ethereum. 50 заранее подписанных разрешений в Ethereum указывают на то, что атаку планировали заблаговременно.

👍27👀25❤23🔥15🤔5😱5👎4😢3

30 Oct 2026, 19:35 UTC≈10,700 views143 reactionsread 6 November 2026

👨🏽‍🦲Чанпэн Чжао резко отреагировал на эмодзи от Илона Маска, назвав момент неподходящим для иронии - на фоне взлома Binance это выглядело как троллинг. Он напомнил, что акции SpaceX, полученные Binance за инвестиции в покупку Twitter, сейчас стоят более $1 млрд, и в шутливо‑угрожающем тоне допустил их продажу "в отместку". При этом он не заявлял о намерении реально их продавать - скорее просил проявить поддержку в тя…

🔥35✍30❤30👍18😱10😢9🤔7👎4

Showing the 12 most recent of 160 posts we hold for @nzt_ic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Offer | Все о Криптовалютах: Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT, Биткоин, BTC” (@nzt_ic), 27,471 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nzt_ic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.